Advanced Search

Syntax: "", OR, AND, EXACT(), /p, /s, /n
(YYYY or YYYY-MM or YYYY-MM-DD)
Sort by: Relevance Date

2,511 result(s)

  • 2,401.

    Williams v. Leonard & Sons - (1896) 26 SCR 406 - 1896-06-06

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Priorities and hypothecs

    In the case of Leask v. Scott[17], it was held that the endorsee of a bill of lading who took the same in satisfaction of a prior debt was a bonâ fide transferee for value.

  • 2,402.

    Dinner v. Humberstone - (1896) 26 SCR 252 - 1896-05-18

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Constitutional law

    I cannot add to what Mr. Justice Scott has said upon this point. As that learned judge says, if the appellants' contention is correct, they might have effected the same thing equally by making the payment of a single fare and admission to membership continuing only during the transit.

  • 2,403.

    The Northern Pacific Express Company v. Martin - (1896) 26 SCR 135 - 1896-03-24

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Commercial law

    Scott v. Avery ([17]); Dawson v. Fitzgerald ([18]); Central Vermont v. Soper ([19]).

  • 2,404.

    SCR | RCS (1895) vol 24 - 1895-06-26

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    ' Exton v. Scott . Fairbanks v. The Queen • Farnell v. Bowman . • Feather v. The Queen . .   [...]  702 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. [VOL. XXIV. 1894 BRITISH COLUMBIA MILLS CO. y. SCOTT. *Oct. 16.   [...]  The trial judge held that Scott voluntarily incurred the risk and dismissed the action.

  • 2,405.

    Clinch v. Pernette - (1895) 24 SCR 385 - 1895-05-06

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Lease

    Exton v. Scott 6 Sim. 31. Fletcher v. Fletcher 4 Hare 67. [8] 1 Ridgway, P. C. 187.

  • 2,406.

    King v. Evans - (1895) 24 SCR 356 - 1895-05-06

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Estates

    [19] 6 Scott N.R. 670. [20] 1 Beav. 100. [21] 3 ed. p. 618. [22] 5 Eng. ed. p. 1265.

  • 2,407.

    Town of St. Stephen v. The County of Charlotte - (1895) 24 SCR 329 - 1895-05-06

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Municipal law

    sum has also been paid out for the purposes of and connected with its enforcement; all sums collected under the said Act within the town have been put into the town treasury to the credit of a special fund called the Scott Act Fund, and there now remains a balance of such fund unexpended in the treasury of the said town.   [...]  The question to be determined by the court is whether under the above statement of facts the town of Saint Stephen is liable to pay over to the municipality of the county of Charlotte the said balance of Scott Act funds, and if it shall be of opinion that the town is so liable then judgment is to be rendered for   [...]  In the treasury of the town of St. Stephen there is a sum of money collected within the town as and for fines inflicted upon persons prosecuted within the town for breach of the Canada Temperance Act which sums have been paid into the said treasury to the credit of a special fund called the Scott Act fund; it is admitted

  • 2,408.

    British Columbia Mills Co. v. Scott - (1895) 24 SCR 702 - 1895-03-11

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Torts

    British Columbia Mills Co. v. Scott, (1895) 24 SCR 702 Supreme Court of Canada   [...]  British Columbia Mills Co. v. Scott, (1895) 24 S.C.R. 702 Date: 1895-03-11   [...]  British Columbia Mills Co. v. Scott 1894: October 16; 1895: March 11.

  • 2,409.

    In re Prohibitory Liquor Laws - (1895) 24 SCR 170 - 1895-01-15

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Constitutional law

    Then, if the provinces claim also a field of legislation as to that, we say it has already been taken up with the Scott Act.   [...]  Except for the decision of the Judicial Committee in Russell v. The Queen[77] (the Scott Act case), much might be said to favour the view that the right of the   [...]  It has passed the Scott Act. It has prescribed the method by which in Canada prohibition may be secured and is not any local enactment purporting to change that method or otherwise secure the desired end, for the time being inoperative, overridden by the expression of the controlling legislative will.

  • 2,410.

    SCR | RCS (1895) vol 23 - 1895-01-01

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    See also Scott v. Brown (6). Aylesworth Q. C. and McKillop for the respondent.   [...]  In Scott v. Brown (1) Lord Justice Lindley says : Ex turpi causd non oritur'actio.   [...]  Solicitors for respondents : Scott, Lees gr Hobson. (1) [1893] A. C. 602.

  • 2,411.

    Henderson v. The Bank of Hamilton - (1894) 23 SCR 716 - 1894-10-09

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Courts

    Solicitors for respondents: Scott, Lees & Hobson. [1] 20 Ont. App. R. 646.

  • 2,412.

    Trent Valley Woollen Manufacturing Co. v. Oelrichs & Co. - (1894) 23 SCR 682 - 1894-10-09

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Sale

    The additional authorities referred to by the respondents, Bartlett v. Pentland[10]; Pearson v. Scott[11]; Bayliffe v. Butterworth[12]; Pollock v. Stables[13]; Greaves v. Legg[14]; Addison on Contracts[15]; are all to the same effect.

  • 2,413.

    Walsh v. Trebilcock - (1894) 23 SCR 695 - 1894-10-09

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Criminal law

    See also Scott v. Brown[7]. Aylesworth Q.C. and McKillop for the respondent.   [...]  In Scott v. Brown[28] Lord Justice Lindley says: Ex turpi causâ non oritur actio.   [...]  I pass by numerous cases since; Pearce v. Brooks[43]; Rex v. Dr. Berenger[44]; Reg. v. Aspinall[45]; and refer particularly to Scott v. Brown[46] decided by the court of Appeal in August last, where the court refused to enforce a contract held to be an illegal transaction and subjecting the parties to indictment for

  • 2,414.

    SCR | RCS (1894) vol 22 - 1894-03-13

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    Scarf v. Jardine. . . 7 App. Scott v. Shepherd . . 1 Sm. L. C. 9 ed. 480..   [...]  Black and Scott for Ottawa, in view of opening negotiations on the subjects of their mission with the Government at Ottawa.   [...]  Ritchot, Black and Scott, received on the 25th (1) 19 Can. S.C.R. 374.

  • 2,415.

    The Queen v. Cimon - (1894) 23 SCR 62 - 1894-03-13

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    Oakes v. The City of Hakifax ([22]); Russell v. Lefrancois ([23]) and cases there cited Lash v. Meriden Britannia Co. ([24]); The Tasmania ([25]); Bank of Bengal v. Macleod ([26]); Scott v. The Phoenix Assurance Co. ([27]); Redfield v. Wickham ([28]); Cooper v. Cooper ([29]); Luke v. Magistrates of Edinburgh ([30]);

  • 2,416.

    In Re Statutes of Manitoba relating to Education - (1894) 22 SCR 577 - 1894-02-20

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Statutes

    Black and Scott as joint delegates to confer with the Government of Ottawa, and negotiate the terms and conditions upon which the inhabitants of Assiniboia would consent to enter confederation with the Provinces of Canada.   [...]  Black and Scott for Ottawa, in view of opening negotiations on the subjects of their mission with the Government at Ottawa.   [...]  Ritchot, Black and Scott, received on the 25th [Page 668] April, 1870, from the Hon. Mr. Howe, the then Secretary of State for the Dominion of Canada, a letter informing them that the Hon. Sir John A. Macdonald and Sir George Cartier had been authorized by the Government of Canada to confer with them on the subject of their

  • 2,417.

    The City of Vancouver v. The Canadian Pacific Railway Co. - (1894) 23 SCR 1 - 1894-02-20

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Statutes

    See Hardcastle on Statutes[9]; The Queen v. Scott[10]; The Queen v. Morris[11]; Galloway v. Mayor of London[12].

  • 2,418.

    J.O. Wisner Son & Co. v. Coulthard, Scott & Co. - (1893) 22 SCR 178 - 1893-06-24

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Intellectual property

    J.O. Wisner Son & Co. v. Coulthard, Scott & Co., (1893) 22 SCR 178 Supreme Court of Canada   [...]  J.O. Wisner Son & Co. v. Coulthard, Scott & Co., (1893) 22 S.C.R. 178   [...]  Coulthard, Scott & Company and Others (Defendants) Respondents. 1893: March 17, 18; 1893: June 24.

  • 2,419.

    Prescott (Town) v. Connell - (1893) 22 SCR 147 - 1893-06-24

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Torts

    In the leading case of Scott v. Shepherd[32]—the Squib case—the ground of the decision was that the act of the intermediate persons who threw the squib was involuntary, unpremeditated and without distinct and independent volition, and therefore, as the act was instinctive, the actual proximate agent of the injury was not

  • 2,420.

    Scott v. The Bank of New Brunswick - (1893) 23 SCR 277 - 1893-02-20

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Agency

    Scott v. The Bank of New Brunswick, (1893) 23 SCR 277 Supreme Court of Canada   [...]  The Scott v. The Bank of New Brunswick (1894) 23 SCR 277 Date: 1894-05-31   [...]  Robert Scott (Plaintiff) Appellant And The Bank of New Brunswick (Defendant)

  • 2,421.

    SCR | RCS (1893) vol 21 - 1893-02-20

    Canada Supreme Court Reports

    xvi TABLE OF CASES CITED. [S. C. R. Vol. XXI. NAME OP CABE. Hodgson v. Bibby • 32 Beay. 221 Hoggart v. Scott . 1 Russ.   [...]  Code for respondent. 1892 SCOTT v. THE BANK OF NEW BRUNSWICK. *May 16.   [...]  Scott v. The Bank of New Brunswick (4). STRONG, FOURNIER and TASCHEREAU JJ. concurred in the judgment of Mr. Justice Patterson.

  • 2,422.

    The Manitoba Free Press Company v. Martin. - (1892) 21 SCR 518 - 1892-12-13

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Torts

    Scott v. The Bank of New Brunswick (4). STRONG, FOURNIER and TASCHEREAU JJ. concurred in the judgment of Mr. Justice Patterson.

  • 2,423.

    Couture v. Bouchard - (1892) 21 SCR 281 - 1892-11-03

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Appeal

    [9] 4.Scott 486. [10] 9 Q. B. 47. [11] 54 & 55 Vic. ch. 25 sec. 3.

  • 2,424.

    Harris v. Robinson - (1892) 21 SCR 390 - 1892-10-10

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Contract

    As to waiver see Salisbury v. Hatcher[5] and Hoggart v. Scott[6]. Plaintiff was entitled to reasonable notice of rescission.

  • 2,425.

    Williams v. Raleigh (Township) - (1892) 21 SCR 103 - 1892-06-28

    Supreme Court Judgments
    Municipal law

    Scott v. Corporation of Peterboro’[12]. As to necessity of notice see Chrysler v. Township of Sarnia[13]; Luney v. Essery[14].