Advanced Search
- All Databases (1,254)
- Decisions (530)
- Resources (724)
1,254 result(s)
-
951.
SCR | RCS [1950] - 1950-10-03
Canada Supreme Court ReportsA TABLE OF THE NAMES OF THE CASES CITED IN THIS VOLUME NAME OF CASE Acme Products Ltd Accomac, The Adderley v. Dixon Agar-E 11 ~ 's , in re A l derslade v. Hendon Laundry All en, re Allen v. Allen, People ex. rel Allen v. Flood Alliance Invest. [...] [1947] S.C.R. 268 433 5 O.W.R. 542 592 11 A.C. 607 551 [1893] 2 Ch. 514 409 [1862] 4 Allen (Mass.) 321 727 [1868] 6 Eg. 410 409 445 [...] Allen v. Allen (2), the wife commenced an action for divorce in the Supreme Court of Illinois in which the husband appeared.
-
952.
McKee v. McKee - [1950] SCR 700 - 1950-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsFamily law
Allen v. Allen[10], the wife commenced an action for divorce in the Supreme Court of Illinois in which the husband appeared. [...] In any event, it was pointed out by Rose J., as he then was, in Re Allen[32], after the statute had taken its present form, that the amendments of 1923 left untouched the provisions of section 3, namely, [...] [30] (1862) 4 Allen (Mass.) 321. [31] (1915) 8 O.W.N. 567. [32] (1928) 35 O.W.N. 101
-
953.
Newell v. Barker - [1950] SCR 385 - 1950-02-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
In the analysis made by Viscount Simon, in particular, of such and similar purposes as they have been exemplified in the leading cases from Mogul S.S. Company v. McGregor, Gow & Co.[11], Allen v. Flood[12], and Quinn v. Leatham[13], to Sorrell v. Smith[14], the purpose of malice, as meaning either malevolence or a
-
954.
SCR | RCS [1948] - 1948-10-27
Canada Supreme Court ReportsI have not overlooked the decision in Allen v. The King (3), but each case must depend on its own facts. [...] Solicitor for the appellant: T. K. Allen. Solicitor for the respondents Brethour and Meyer: Duncan A. Mcllraith. [...] The parties did not intend to have their rights determined outside of the ordinary jurisdiction of the court; Pickard v. Allen and Dewar (6).
-
955.
The King v. Schmidt - [1948] SCR 333 - 1948-06-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
H.W. Allen for the respondent. The judgment of the Chief Justice and of Kerwin J. was delivered by
-
956.
Meyer v. Capital Trust Corp. Ltd. - [1948] SCR 329 - 1948-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
W.J. Green K.C. and T.K. Allen for the widow appellant. W.E. Haughton K.C. and Charles F. Scott for different groups of beneficiaries, respondents. [...] Solicitor for the appellant: T.K. Allen. Solicitor for the respondents Brethour and Meyer: Duncan A. McIlraith.
-
957.
Shook v. Munro et al. - [1948] SCR 539 - 1948-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
The parties did not intend to have their rights determined outside of the ordinary jurisdiction of the court; Pickard v. Allen and Dewar[10].
-
958.
Northey v. The King - [1948] SCR 135 - 1948-03-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
I have not overlooked the decision in Allen v. The King[7] , but each case must depend on its own facts. [...] In Allen v. Rex[10] , Chief Justice Sir Charles Fitzpatrick said at page 336:— [...] In this Court, after commenting upon Allen v. The King[27] , my lord The Chief Justice (then Rinfret, J.) in writing the judgment of the Court stated at p. 544:
-
959.
Central Jewish Institute v. City of Toronto - [1948] SCR 101 - 1948-02-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
J.R. Cartwright K.C. and S. Allen for the appellant. F.A.A. Campbell K.C. and J.N. Herapath for the respondent.
-
960.
SCR | RCS [1947] - 1947-10-07
Canada Supreme Court ReportsThere was also some evidence that from time to time the appellant placed a car on the siding for the convenience of a man by the name of Allen.
-
961.
Dominion Atlantic Ry. Co. v. Halifax and South Western Ry. Co. - [1947] SCR 107 - 1946-12-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
There was also some evidence that from time to time the appellant placed a car on the siding for the convenience of a man by the name of Allen.
-
962.
SCR | RCS [1946] - 1946-10-01
Canada Supreme Court ReportsR. H. Allen, for the respondent at the hearing of the appeal. A. B. Gilbert K.C. for the respondent at the re-hearing ordered by the Court. [...] Solicitors for the respondent: Allen & Allen. (1) [1946] S.C.R. 1, at 18.
-
963.
Attorney-General for Canada v. Jackson - [1946] SCR 489 - 1946-03-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsState
R. H. Allen, for the respondent at the hearing of the appeal. A. B. Gilbert K.C. for the respondent at the re-hearing ordered by the Court. [...] Solicitors for the respondent: Allen & Allen. [1] (1945) 18 M.P.R. 138; [1945] 2 D.L.R. 438.
-
964.
SCR | RCS [1945] - 1945-11-09
Canada Supreme Court ReportsIt appears that by lease dated the 8th of June, 1918, the deceased granted this property to Allen Brothers for a term of thirty-five years from the 2nd day of November, 1. 918, the principal material terms of the lease being:— (1) [1944] S.C.R. 243. [...] The first dealing of which we are informed is a lease made by Mr. Withycombe to Allen Brothers, Theatre Proprietors, in 1918. [...] By an agreement in writing dated June 8th, 1918, the late Mr. A. G. Withycombe as owner leased this property to Allen Brothers for a period of thirty-five years from the 2nd day of November, 1918.
-
965.
In re Withycombe Estate / Attorney-General of Alberta v. Royal Trust Co. - [1945] SCR 267 - 1945-02-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
It appears that by lease dated the 8th of June, 1918, the deceased granted this property to Allen Brothers for a term of thirty-five years from the 2nd day of November, 1918, the principal material terms of the lease being:— [...] The first dealing of which we are informed is a lease made by Mr. Withycombe to Allen Brothers, Theatre Proprietors, in 1918. [...] By an agreement in writing dated June 8th, 1918, the late Mr. A. G. Withycombe as owner leased this property to Allen Brothers for a period of thirty-five years from the 2nd day of November, 1918.
-
966.
SCR | RCS [1944] - 1944-11-23
Canada Supreme Court ReportsA TABLE OF THE NAMES OF THE CASES CITED IN THIS VOLUME ,A NAME OF- CASE WHERE REPORTED PAGE Adoption Act, etc., Reference re [1938] S.C.R. 398 359 Allen v. Hay 64 Can. S.C.R. 76 323 Aluminum Company of Canada Ltd. v City of Toronto [1944] O.R. 66; [1944] 1 D.L.R. 435; [1944] C.T.C. 1 268 Archibald v. Delisle 25 Can. S.C.R. [...] As it has been said by Sir Lyman Duff, in Allen v. Hay (1), 64 S.C.R. at page 81: These experts may, however, refer to codes and precedents in support of their evidence and the passages and references cited by them will be (1) (1922) 64 S.C.R. 76, at 81. 14998--3i [...] This was expressly stated in the case of Allen v. Hay (1) . For the present law, he largely relied upon a decision of the Supreme Court of that State reported as Feneff v. New. York Central & Hudson River Railroad Co. (2), which was decided in 1909.
-
967.
Lister v. McAnulty - [1944] SCR 317 - 1944-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsInternational law
As it has been said by Sir Lyman Duff, in Allen v. Hay[3], 64 S.C.R. at page 81: [...] This was expressly stated in the case of Allen v. Hay[8]. For the present law, he largely relied upon a decision of the Supreme Court of that State reported as Feneff v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Co.[9], which was decided in 1909.
-
968.
SCR | RCS [1943] - 1943-10-18
Canada Supreme Court ReportsSolicitor for the respondent: John Allen. (1) (1905) 20 Cox's Criminal (2) (1913) 24 Cox's Criminal Cases 711, at 713. [...] Hudson J. Solicitor for the respondent, Canadian National Railway Company: T. J. Allen.
-
969.
F.W. Pirie Company Ltd. v. Canadian National Ry. Co. and Simmons - [1943] SCR 275 - 1943-04-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Solicitor for the respondent, Canadian National Railway Company: T. J. Allen.
-
970.
Gach v. The King - [1943] SCR 250 - 1943-04-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Solicitor for the respondent: John Allen. [1] [1914] A. C. 599, at 609.
-
971.
SCR | RCS [1942] - 1942-11-12
Canada Supreme Court ReportsCommissioner of Income Tax (Provincial) Fisheries, Provincial, In re Jurisdiction over Forbes v. Coca-Cola Company of Canada, Ltd. and Guiteau [1941] 3 W.W.R. 909; [1942] 1 D.L.R. Fortier v. Longchamp [1941] S.C.R. 193 Fortier v. Longchamp Fraser v. Beyers-Allen Lumber Co. Fullarton's Trustees v. James .... ...... 23 Sess. [...] not; and it was the evident intention of the legislature of Quebec, as expressed in that article, to grant to the Quebec courts jurisdiction over aliens or parties outside the province, if the whole cause of action arose therein (Fraser v. Beyers-Allen Lumber Company (1) ; Gosset v. Robin (2) ; Archambault v. Bolduc (3).)
-
972.
Canadian National Ry. Co. v. Canadian Industries Ltd. - [1941] SCR 591 - 1941-10-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
same as Allen v. Canadian Pacific Ry. Co.[4], which was binding on him, and that under the circumstances here the defendants were not entitled to rely upon the terms of a standard bill of lading.
-
973.
SCR | RCS [1941] - 1941-10-20
Canada Supreme Court Reports[1939] O.R. 36 Newsholme v. Road Transport & General Insurance Co. [1929] 2 KB.D. 356 New York Life Ins. Co. v. Fletcher.... 117 U.S. Rep. 519 Nippon Yusen Kaisha v. The China Navi- gation Co. O O'Brien v. Allen O'Carroll v. Hastings [1905] 2 Ir. Rep. 590 Oceanic, The Ontario & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. Canadian [...] S.C.R.] SUPREME COURT OF CANADA 415 The right of building highways and of operating them 1941 within a province, whether under direct authority of the PRONP I AL Government, or by means of independent companies or SECRETARY OF municipalities, is wholly within the purview of the prov-PRINCE ince (O'Brien v. Allen (1) ), and [...] S.C.R.] SUPREME COURT OF CANADA 597 same as Allen v. Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. (1), which was 1941 binding on him, and that under the circumstances here CANADIAN the defendants were not entitled to rely upon the terms NATIONAL Rr. Co. of a standard bill of lading.
-
974.
Provincial Secretary of Prince Edward Island v. Egan - [1941] SCR 396 - 1941-04-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsMotor vehicles
The right of building highways and of operating them within a province, whether under direct authority of the Government, or by means of independent companies or municipalities, is wholly within the purview of the province (O'Brien v. Allen ([15])), and so is the right to provide for the safety of circulation and traffic on
-
975.
Ripstein v. Trower & Sons. Ltd. - [1942] SCR 107 - 1941-02-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
or not; and it was the evident intention of the legislature of Quebec, as expressed in that article, to grant to the Quebec courts jurisdiction over aliens or parties outside the province, if the whole cause of action arose therein (Fraser v. Beyers-Allen Lumber Company[3]; Gosset v. Robin[4]; Árchambault v. Bolduc[5].)