Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
2,369 result(s)
-
2,051.
City of Vancouver v. Bailey - (1895) 25 SCR 62 - 1895-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
William Bailey Respondent 1895: May 13; 1895: December 9. Present: Sir Henry Strong C.J., and Taschereau, Gwynne, Sedgewick and King JJ.
-
2,052.
Dominion Grange Mutual Fire Insurance Association v. Bradt - (1895) 25 SCR 154 - 1895-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
Application of B. Barnes of the Township of West Williams to the Dominion Grange, Mutual Fire Insurance Association, for insurance against loss or damage by fire or lightning to the amount of $1,500 for four years from the 13th January, 1891, on the following property:
-
2,053.
Kerr v. The Atlantic & North West Railway Co. - (1895) 25 SCR 197 - 1895-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
WILLIAM M. KERR AND OTHERS (PLAINTIFFS) Appellant; And THE ATLANTIC AND NORTH WEST RAILWAY COMPANY (DEFENDANTS)
-
2,054.
Law v. Hansen - (1895) 25 SCR 69 - 1895-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
William Law and Others (Defendants) Appellant And Gustav Conrad Hansen (Plaintiff)
-
2,055.
Province of Ontario v. The Dominion of Canada and Province of Quebec. In re Indian Claims - (1895) 25 SCR 434 - 1895-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
On the one side Her Majesty, Queen Victoria, represented by the Hon. William Robinson, Commissioner of Crown Lands, and on the other side certain tribes of Indians called in the treaty Nation Indians of Lake Huron, and Ojibeways of Lake Superior. [...] On the 7th September, 1850, the Hon. William B. Robinson, acting as a commissioner on behalf of the Crown, obtained from the Ojibeway Indians of the Lake Superior district a surrender in favour of the Crown of certain Indian territory, situate within the limits of the late province of Canada, as described in a treaty [...] The said William Benjamin Robinson on behalf of Her Majesty, who desires to deal liberally and justly with all her subjects, further promises and agrees that in case the territory hereby ceded by the parties of the second part shall at any future period produce such an amount as will enable the government of this province,
-
2,056.
Merritt v. Hepenstal - (1895) 25 SCR 150 - 1895-10-31
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
William H. Merritt (Defendant) Appellant And Reginald F. D. Hepenstal (Plaintiff)
-
2,057.
Archbald v. Delisle / Baker v. Delisle / Mowat v. Delisle - (1895) 25 SCR 1 - 1895-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
WILLIAM MOWAT et al. (INTERVENANTS) Appellants; AND M. NOLAN DELISLE et at (CONTESTANTS) [...] The business was managed by William Workman up to the time of his death in February, 1878. [...] Upon the death of William Workman, A. M. deLisle and the executors of William Workman (Joel C. Baker Robert Moat and John Moat) continued the business of the syndicate.
-
2,058.
Colchester South (Township) v. Valad - (1895) 24 SCR 622 - 1895-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
On the merits the learned counsel referred to Corporation of Raleigh v. Williams[2]; Cowper Acton v. Essex[3]; Cripps on Compensation[4]. [...] In the case of the latter, tested by the principle laid down by the Privy Council in Williams v. Raleigh[11] as to the distinction between compensation under the statute for lands injuriously affected and
-
2,059.
Donohoe v. Hull - (1895) 24 SCR 683 - 1895-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsFamily law
Even supposing, said Vaughan Williams J., that the plaintiff had taken the proper steps to set aside the settlement as void, and had succeeded in doing so, even then Brown could never have been placed in the position of being obliged to pay over the money to Vyse ; the settlement would still be valid and subsisting between
-
2,060.
Clinch v. Pernette - (1895) 24 SCR 385 - 1895-05-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsLease
The appellant William B. Shaw claims as a purchaser from the other appellants. [...] In June, 1884, William B. Shaw, claiming as before mentioned took possession of the premises. [...] The defendant William B. Shaw pleaded the Nova Scotia Registry Act and also that he was a purchaser for valuable consideration without notice.
-
2,061.
King v. Evans - (1895) 24 SCR 356 - 1895-05-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
A devise to A. for life and after his decease to the male issue of his body and their heirs and in default of issue to other devisees creates an estate tail in A. Frank v. Stovin[6]; and to the same effect are Denn v. Puckey[7]; Williams v. Williams[8]; Hellem v. Severs[9].
-
2,062.
Wigle v. Williams - (1895) 24 SCR 713 - 1895-05-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Wigle v. Williams, (1895) 24 SCR 713 Supreme Court of Canada Wigle v. Williams, (1895) 24 S.C.R. 713 [...] Williams 1895: March 25; 1895: May 6. Present: Sir Henry Strong C.J., and Taschereau, Gwynne, Sedgewick and King JJ. [...] APPEAL from a decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, affirming the judgment for the plaintiff Williams at the trial.
-
2,063.
Fortier v. Lambe - (1895) 25 SCR 422 - 1895-03-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
WILLIAM B. LAMBE, ÈS QUALITÉ (PLAINTIFF) Respondent. 1894: Oct 3; 1894: Oct 4; 1895: Mar 11
-
2,064.
Gooderham v. Toronto (City) - (1895) 25 SCR 246 - 1895-03-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
south of South Park Street and abutting upon the westerly limit of the east half of the said lot; this is apparent from Smith’s own evidence and from an indenture of lease produced in evidence bearing date the 17th July, 1866, whereby Smith demised to William Gooderham, James G. Worts and George Gooderham for 21 years—
-
2,065.
Imrie v. Archibald - (1895) 25 SCR 368 - 1895-03-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Blowers Archibald, Annie Breffit, William H. Archibald and Others, (Plaintiffs and Defendants) [...] date made between Charles William Archibald and Annie Parker, the former conveyed to the latter for the valuable consideration therein expressed the same lands and hereditaments, in fee simple. [...] And, for the reasons just given, the descriptions of the parcels in the conveyance by Charles William Archibald to Mrs. Breffit, and by Mrs. Breffit to Peter Imrie, were also inclusive of the piece of land in question.
-
2,066.
McDonald v. Cummings - (1895) 24 SCR 321 - 1895-03-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
“It is, however, claimed that the instrument is void by reason of the following facts:—William Cummings & Sons were, shortly previous to the assignment, creditors of McKinnon to the extent of $318. [...] But it was further provided in the deed of assignment that the assignee was to pay to William Cummings & Sons not $921 but [...] The assignee was bound, under the instrument to pay William Cummings & Sons $1,201; they might or might not, as they chose, pay the local creditors; if they did, good and well, if not McKinnon was entitled to recover from them.
-
2,067.
Osgoode (Township) v. York - (1895) 24 SCR 282 - 1895-03-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
he required a ditch to be made through such lot and therein alleging that it would be necessary to continue the ditch through certain other lots mentioned therein, among others, the north-west quarter of the same lot no. 27 of which his father William Comrie was named as owner, and the west half of lot no. 28, in the 7th
-
2,068.
Angus v. Union Gas & Oil Stove Co. - (1895) 24 SCR 104 - 1895-01-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
WILLIAM ANGUS AND FRANK B. HOWARD (DEFENDANTS) Appellant; And THE UNION GAS AND OIL STOVE CO. (PLAINTIFFS) [...] APPEAL from a judgment of the Court of Queen's Bench for the province of Quebec, confirming a judgment of the Superior Court under which judgment the appellant William Angus was condemned to pay a sum of $6,000 jointly with the appellant Prank B. Howard, and the appellant Frank B. Howard con demined for the further sum of
-
2,069.
Caldwell v. Accident Ins Co. of North America - (1895) 24 SCR 263 - 1895-01-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
WILLIAM ALEXANDER CALDWELL es qual. (PLAINTIFF PAR REPRISE D'INSTANCE). [...] The action was brought by William McLachlan and Francis W. Radford, as co-partners, under the style of McLachlan, Bros. [...] in October, 1881, a declaration was filed of a partnership between John and William McLachlan, under the name of McLachlan Bros.
-
2,070.
Huson v. South Norwich (Township) - (1895) 24 SCR 145 - 1895-01-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William Huson (Plaintiff) Appellant; and The Municipal Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Norwich (Defendants) Respondents.
-
2,071.
Webster v. City of Sherbrooke - (1895) 24 SCR 268 - 1895-01-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
WILLIAM R. WEBSTER et al (PETITIONERS) Appellants; And THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF SHERBROOKE (RESPONDENTS)
-
2,072.
Bury v. Murray - (1894) 24 SCR 77 - 1894-10-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsEvidence
Art. 1187 C. C; Frostc v. Esson ([3]); Williams v. Rousseau ([4]); Roy v. McShane ([5]); Thibodeau v. Girouard ([6]). [...] It is, asserted by the appellant that the respondent was originally a mere prête-nom for one William Langan For- sixth or that the deed in question, if not made altogether for the behoof of Forsyth, was passed for the purpose, in the first place, of securing the payment to the respondent of certain moneys in which Forsyth
-
2,073.
Hereford Railway Co. v. The Queen - (1894) 24 SCR 1 - 1894-10-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
In a letter dated January 20th, 1890, written by the Hon. William B. Ives president of the suppliants' company to the Hon. Mr. Mercier then minister at the head of the government for the province of Quebec, allusion is made to an additional subsidy for eighteen miles of the line of the suppliants'' railway other than the
-
2,074.
In re Hess Manufacturing Company - (1894) 23 SCR 644 - 1894-10-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
William Sloan (Contributory) Respondent. 1894: May 25, 26; 1894: October 9. [...] Those present personally were H.B. Morphy, Emil G. Hess, William Hess and Elizabeth Hess. [...] At this meeting W.W. Sloan, William Hess and Emil Hess were elected directors for the ensuing year.
-
2,075.
Trent Valley Woollen Manufacturing Co. v. Oelrichs & Co. - (1894) 23 SCR 682 - 1894-10-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
Solicitors for the appellants: Clute & William. Solicitors for the respondents: McCarthy, Osler, Hoskin & Creelman.