Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
1,094 result(s)
-
351.
R. v. G. (R.M.) - [1996] 3 SCR 362 - 1996-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
I would merely add that in making this assessment we should consider the effect of the entire exhortation, and not unduly isolate or highlight one particular reference; see R. v. Halliday (1992), 77 C.C.C. (3d) 481 (Man. C.A.), at p. 494, per Scott C.J., regarding this approach.
-
352.
Michaud v. Quebec (Attorney General) - [1996] 3 SCR 3 - 1996-09-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Solicitor General of Canada v. Royal Commission of Inquiry (Health Records in Ontario), [1981] 2 S.C.R. 494; Bisaillon v. Keable, [1983] 2 S.C.R. 60; R. v. Scott, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 979; Edmonton Journal v. Alberta (Attorney General), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1326; R. v. Wholesale Travel Group Inc., [1991] 3 S.C.R. 154; R. v. [...] 48 For instance, the Crown's obligation of disclosure under Stinchcombe remains subject to the "informers privilege" at common law: see Solicitor General of Canada v. Royal Commission of Inquiry (Health Records in Ontario), [1981] 2 S.C.R. 494, at pp. 535-36; Bisaillon v. Keable, [1983] 2 S.C.R. 60, at p. 93; R. v. Scott, [...] The crucial need for protecting the identity of informers was recently stressed in Scott, supra, at p. 994, per Cory J.:
-
353.
Ontario Home Builders' Association v. York Region Board of Education - [1996] 2 SCR 929 - 1996-08-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
C. 1863, 26 Vict., c. 5 ("Scott Act"), ss. 14, 20. Building Code Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. B.13. [...] Section 20 of the Scott Act 70 The appellants cite s. 20 of the Scott Act as the source of the right to a proportionate share of all public monies. [...] Section 14 of the Scott Act 75 The appellants cite s. 14 of the Scott Act as the source of the right of separate school supporters to be exempt from paying assessments for public school purposes.
-
354.
R. v. Pamajewon - [1996] 2 SCR 821 - 1996-08-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Scott C. Hutchison, for the respondent. Ivan G. Whitehall, Q.C., and Kimberley Prost, for the intervener the Attorney General of Canada.
-
355.
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Canadian Pacific System Federation v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. - [1996] 2 SCR 495 - 1996-07-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
Labour law
H. C. Wendlandt and W. A. Scott Macfarlane, for the appellant. Kate A. Hughes, for the respondent.
-
356.
R. v. Goldhart - [1996] 2 SCR 463 - 1996-07-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Scott K. Fenton, for the appellant. Timothy E. Breen, for the respondent.
-
357.
Béliveau St-Jacques v. Fédération des employées et employés de services publics inc. - [1996] 2 SCR 345 - 1996-06-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Labour law
Scott, F. R. “The Bill of Rights and Quebec Law” (1959), 37 Can. Bar Rev. 135. [...] As F. R. Scott noted in "The Bill of Rights and Quebec Law" (1959), 37 Can. Bar Rev. 135, at p. 136:
-
358.
R. v. Terry - [1996] 2 SCR 207 - 1996-05-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Evidence
Robert Scott Terry Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent
-
359.
Alberta (Treasury Branches) v. M.N.R.; Toronto-Dominion Bank v. M.N.R. - [1996] 1 SCR 963 - 1996-04-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
Taxation
Written submissions only by J. Gary Greenan and Scott Watson, for the respondent Province of Alberta Treasury Branches. [...] There, at pp. 488‑89, Scott C.J.M. observed: To determine the dominant characteristic of the legislation, it is important to know the governmental policy behind the section.
-
360.
R. v. Nikal - [1996] 1 SCR 1013 - 1996-04-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsAboriginal law
In a letter from D. C. Scott, Deputy Superintendent General of Indian Affairs, to D. H. MacDowall, Commissioner, Royal Commission on Indian Affairs for the Province of British Columbia, dated May 2, 1916, it was stated:
-
361.
R. v. Badger - [1996] 1 SCR 771 - 1996-04-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsAboriginal law
Solicitors for the intervener the Assembly of First Nations: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa.
-
362.
Helo Enterprises Ltd. v. Standard Trust Co. (Liquidators of) - [1996] 1 SCR 183 - 1996-02-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
Priorities and hypothecs
David W. Scott and J. A. Donald Bohun, for the appellant. William Kaplan and Scott A. Turner, for the respondent.
-
363.
Esmail v. Petro-Canada - [1997] 2 SCR 3 - 1996-02-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Solicitors for the applicant: Scott & Aylen, Toronto. Solicitors for the respondent: Miller Thomson, Toronto.
-
364.
A. (L.L.) v. B. (A.) - [1995] 4 SCR 536 - 1995-12-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
Criminal law
Stone, Scott N., and Robert K. Taylor. Testimonial Privileges, 2nd ed. [...] Sheena Scott and David Mikelberg, for the intervener the Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law. [...] See Scott N. Stone and Robert K. Taylor, in Testimonial Privileges (2nd ed. 1993), for a more detailed compilation of the statutes granting such privilege in the United States as well as the degree and the extent of confidentiality it affords to such communications.
-
365.
Blueberry River Indian Band v. Canada (Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) - [1995] 4 SCR 344 - 1995-12-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsAboriginal law
Action
Solicitors for the intervener the Assembly of First Nations: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa.
-
366.
R. v. O'Connor - [1995] 4 SCR 411 - 1995-12-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Brian Weagant and Sheena Scott, for the intervener the Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law. [...] The general test for abuse of process adopted in that case has been repeatedly affirmed: R. v. Keyowski, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 657, at pp. 658-59, R. v. Mack, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 903, at p. 941, R. v. Conway, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1659, at p. 1667, R. v. Scott, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 979, at pp. 992-93, and most recently in R. v. Power, [1994] 1 [...] In Scott, supra, in the context of an immediate stay by the Crown upon the posing by defence counsel of a question which would have revealed the identity of a police informer, the majority again considered abuse of process separately from an examination of whether the accused's s. 11 (b) rights had been violated by the
-
367.
R. v. Hinse - [1995] 4 SCR 597 - 1995-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
Appeal
R. v. Terlecki (1983), 4 C.C.C. (3d) 522, aff'd [1985] 2 S.C.R. 483; R. v. Provo, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Sullivan, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 489; R. v. Barnes, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 449; R. v. Jewitt, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 128; R. v. Keyowski, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 657; R. v. Mack, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 903; R. v. Conway, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1659; R. v. Scott [...] See, e.g., R. v. Keyowski, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 657, at pp. 658-59; R. v. Mack, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 903, at p. 941; R. v. Conway, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1659, at p. 1667; and R. v. Scott, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 979, at pp. 992-93. [...] In other words, notwithstanding the broad remedial language of s. 686(8) , both trial and appellate courts may only impose a stay of proceedings for abuse of process in accordance with the principles and limits we have set out in Jewitt, Keyowski, Mack, Conway, and Scott.
-
368.
R. v. Jorgensen - [1995] 4 SCR 55 - 1995-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
LaFave, Wayne R., and Austin W. Scott, Jr. Substantive Criminal Law, vol. 1. [...] Discussing the present state of the defence in American law, W. R. LaFave and A. W. Scott state:
-
369.
R. v. K. (B.) - [1995] 4 SCR 186 - 1995-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
R. Peter MacKinnon, Q.C., and E. Scott Hopley, for the appellant. Graeme G. Mitchell and Sandra Folkins, for the respondent.
-
370.
R. v. Shropshire - [1995] 4 SCR 227 - 1995-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
C.A.); R. v. Mitchell (1987), 39 C.C.C. (3d) 141 (N.S.C.A.); R. v. Young (1993), 78 C.C.C. (3d) 538 (N.S.C.A.); R. v. Able (1993), 65 O.A.C. 37 (C.A.); R. v. Ly (1992), 72 C.C.C. (3d) 57 (Man. C.A.), per Twaddle J.A. (Scott C.J.M. concurring), at p. 61: "Parliament's purpose in adding a minimum period of parole
-
371.
R. v. Marc - [1995] 4 SCR 50 - 1995-11-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Scott F. Fowler, for the appellant. Luc Labonté and Ronald Leblanc, for the respondent.
-
372.
R. v. Harrer - [1995] 3 SCR 562 - 1995-10-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
and Robert Scott Terry Interveners Indexed as: R. v. Harrer File No.: 24141. [...] Charles I. M. Lugosi, for the intervener Robert Scott Terry. The judgment of Lamer C.J. and La Forest, L'Heureux-Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory and Iacobucci JJ. was delivered by [...] Solicitor for the intervener Robert Scott Terry: Charles Lugosi, Prince George.
-
373.
R. v. Pontes - [1995] 3 SCR 44 - 1995-09-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
LaFave, Wayne R., and Austin W. Scott, Jr. Substantive Criminal Law, vol. 1. [...] Another way of formulating this exception is simply to say that ignorance of the law is an excuse if Parliament or a legislature has provided that it is an excuse (LaFave and Scott, supra, at p. 585, footnote 55). [...] (See also D. Stuart, Canadian Criminal Law: A Treatise (3rd ed. 1995), at pp. 312-21, and Mewett & Manning on Criminal Law (3rd ed. 1994), at pp. 382-84; and for a summary of the American position, see LaFave and Scott, supra, at pp. 591-95.)
-
374.
Ontario v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. - [1995] 2 SCR 1031 - 1995-07-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
The rationale of this doctrine was explained by Sir William Scott in the case of The "Reward" (1818), 2 Dods. 265, 165 E.R. 1482, at pp. 269-70 and p. 1484:
-
375.
R. v. Crosby - [1995] 2 SCR 912 - 1995-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Wayne Scott Crosby Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent [...] Q:Had you had sex with Scott before? A:The Friday night before I did. [...] Q:O.K. were you hoping to have sex with Scott again that night? A:No.