Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
1,094 result(s)
-
526.
Cardinal et al. v. The Queen - [1982] 1 SCR 508 - 1982-04-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsAboriginal law
Statutes
Ian Scott, Q.C., and Alain Dubuc, for the intervener Federation of Saskatchewan Indians.
-
527.
Rubis v. Gray Rocks Inn Ltd. - [1982] 1 SCR 452 - 1982-04-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
[Quebec Railway, Light, Heat and Power Company v. Vandry, [1920] A.C. 662; City of Montreal v. Watt and Scott Limited, [1922] 2 A.C. 555; City of Montreal v. Salaison Maisonneuve Ltée, [1954] S.C.R. 117; Jalbert v. Cité de Sherbrooke, [1962] S.C.R. 94; Curley v. Latreille (1920), 60 S.C.R. 131; Fisher v. Ouimet (1937), 75 [...] Article 1054 creates a presumption of liability against anyone having a thing in his care when the damage is caused by the positive and independent action of that thing: Quebec Railway, Light, Heat and Power Company v. Vandry, [1920] A.C. 662; City of Montreal v. Watt and Scott Limited, [1922] 2 A.C. 555; City of Montreal
-
528.
A.G. (Nova Scotia) v. MacIntyre - [1982] 1 SCR 175 - 1982-01-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
L.Q. 119; Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc. (1978), 98 S. Ct. 1306; R. v. Wright, 8 T.R. 293; Gazette Printing Co. v. Shallow (1909), 41 S.C.R. 339; Scott v. Scott, [1913] A.C. 417; McPherson v. McPherson, [1936] A.C. 177, referred to.] [...] The leading case is the decision of the House of Lords in Scott v. Scott, [1913] A.C. 417. [...] It is, of course, true that Scott v. Scott and McPherson v. McPherson were cases in which proceedings had reached the stage of trial whereas the issuance of a search warrant takes place at the pre-trial investigative stage.
-
529.
Oliver et al. v. The Queen - [1981] 2 SCR 240 - 1981-10-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Criminal law
Scott Douglas Oliver, Kirt Harold Oliver and William Henderson Appellants; [...] Peter B. Gunn, for the appellant Scott D. Oliver. Alex Pringle, for the appellant Kirt H. Oliver. [...] Solicitors for the appellant Scott D. Oliver: Gunn & Company, Edmonton.
-
530.
Royal Bank of Canada v. Deputy Minister of National Revenue for Customs and Excise - [1981] 2 SCR 139 - 1981-10-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsCustoms and excise
H. Lorne Morphy, Q.C., and Charles F. Scott, for the appellant. Eric Bowie, Q.C., and Deen C. Olsen, for the respondent.
-
531.
Re: Resolution to amend the Constitution - [1981] 1 SCR 753 - 1981-09-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
He himself recognizes that there are contrary views, including those of an equally distinguished scholar, Professor F. R. Scott: see Scott, Essays on the Constitution (1977), at pp. 144, 169, 204-5, 245, 370-71, 402.
-
532.
Attorney General of Alberta et al. v. Putnam et al. - [1981] 2 SCR 267 - 1981-05-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
We at Ottawa are anxious to meet you in as generous a spirit as may be found possible, but you must gradually, if not immediately, accept the natural and constitutional heritage of all Provinces, and pay the cost thereof.” [Laurier to Premiers Scott and Rutherford, 7 February 1906, Public Archives of Canada, RG 18, A-1,
-
533.
Dorbern Investments v. Provincial Bank - [1981] 1 SCR 459 - 1981-05-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
APPEAL from a decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal[1], upholding the judgment of the Ontario Divisional Court reversing the decision of Scott J. Appeal dismissed.
-
534.
Re Residential Tenancies Act - [1981] 1 SCR 714 - 1981-05-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Ian Scott, Q.C., and Mary Hogan, for the intervener Federation of Metro Tenants Association et al. [...] Solicitors for the Federation of Metro Tenants Association et al.: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto.
-
535.
Isabelle v. Ontario Public Service Employees Union - [1981] 1 SCR 449 - 1981-05-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
Ian Scott, Q.C., for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered by [...] Solicitors for the respondent: Cameron, Brewin and Scott, Toronto.
-
536.
Rothman v. The Queen - [1981] 1 SCR 640 - 1981-03-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Scott T. Milloy, for the appellant. E.G. Ewaschuk, Q.C., and J.A. Pethes, for the respondent. [...] The fact that Constable Munn said to Sergeant Scott in the presence of the appellant that the old man has regained consciousness and will be able to identify his assailants,—although untrue, and might induce a sense of fear in the appellant, would not render the statement inadmissible. [...] Solicitor for the appellant: Scott T. Milloy, Ottawa. Solicitor for the respondent: R. Tassé, Ottawa.
-
537.
Pettkus v. Becker - [1980] 2 SCR 834 - 1980-12-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsTrust
(See A.W. Scott, “Constructive Trusts”, (1955), 71 L.Q.R. 39; Leonard Pollock, “Matrimonial Property and Trusts: The Situation from Murdoch to Rathwell”, (1978), 16 Alberta Law Review 357). [...] This applies especially to the notion that resulting and constructive trusts run together and the amalgam is an equitable remedy: see e.g. A.W. Scott (1955) 71 L.Q.R. 39.
-
538.
Attorney General of British Columbia v. Canada Trust Co. et al. - [1980] 2 SCR 466 - 1980-06-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Professor Frank Scott noted in (1934), 12 Can. Bar. Rev. 303, at p. 305, that this restating of the ratio decidendi in the Fairbanks case amounted to a virtual overruling and commented: “Henceforth it appears that the question of what the tax was universally considered to be in 1867 is irrelevant.” In Atlantic Smoke Shops
-
539.
R. v. Dubois - [1980] 2 SCR 21 - 1980-06-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Lorne Scott, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
-
540.
Four B Manufacturing v. United Garmet Workers - [1980] 1 SCR 1031 - 1979-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Labour law
Ian Scott, Q.C., and Harry Freedman, for the respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board. [...] Solicitors for the respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto.
-
541.
Clark et al. v. Royal Bank of Canada - [1980] 1 SCR 177 - 1979-11-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsProfessional law
Solicitors for the respondent: Hanson, Hashey & Scott, Fredericton.
-
542.
Fraser-Reid v. Droumtsekas - [1980] 1 SCR 720 - 1979-11-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
1 All E.R. 462; Miller v. Cannon Hill Estates, Ltd., [1931] 2 K.B. 113; Hoskins v. Woodham, [1938] 1 All E.R. 692; Croft v. Prendergast, [1949] O.R. 282; Scott-Polson v. Hope (1958), 14 D.L.R. (2d) 333; Smith v. Melançon, [1976] 4 W.W.R. 9; Schipper v. Levitt & Sons Inc., 207 A. 2d 314 (1965, S.C. of New Jersey); [...] See also, Croft v. Prendergast[6]; Scott‑Polson v. Hope[7]; and Smith v. Melançon[8].
-
543.
Olympic Towers Ltd. v. Shervale Developments Inc. et al. - [1980] 1 SCR 142 - 1979-10-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
David W. Scott, for the Owner, Robert A. Lalonde, in Trust. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by [...] Solicitors for the Owner, Robert A. Lalonde, in Trust: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa.
-
544.
McCauley v. McVey et al. - [1980] 1 SCR 165 - 1979-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Solicitors for the appellant: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa. Solicitors for the respondent McVey: Weir & Foulds, Toronto.
-
545.
LePage Ltd. v. March et al. - [1979] 2 SCR 155 - 1979-06-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Property law
Ian G. Scott, for the other respondents. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
-
546.
Canadian Laboratory Supplies v. Engelhard Industries - [1979] 2 SCR 787 - 1979-05-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
Torts
It was Cook who called back later that day, telling Scott he was asked to speak [...] Cook undertook to make enquiries to answer Scott’s question and to call back but never did. [...] This testimony is corroborated by the evidence given by Scott, the President of Engelhard, who stated:
-
547.
Bell v. R. - [1979] 2 SCR 212 - 1979-04-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
Re Howard v. City of Toronto (1927), 61 O.L.R. 563; Kruse v. Johnson, [1898] 2 Q.B. 91; Scott v. Pilliner, [1904] 2 K.B. 855; Mixnam’s Properties Ltd. v. Chertsey Urban District Council, [1964] 1 Q.B. 214 applied.] [...] His Honour Judge Hogg accepted this submission, and in doing so considered several cases to which I shall refer hereafter, adopting the principle set out in Kruse v. Johnson[3], Scott v. Pilliner[4], as further considered in Mixnam’s Properties Ltd. v. Chertsey Urban District Council[5], and concluded:
-
548.
Hunt v. The Queen - [1979] 2 SCR 73 - 1979-03-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Solicitors for the appellant: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa. Solicitor for the respondent: John E. Hall, Vancouver.
-
549.
Papalia v. R. - [1979] 2 SCR 256 - 1979-03-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Evidence
“It is plain that Scott, L.J. had in mind the old rule that a party must produce the best evidence that the nature of the case will allow, and that any less good evidence is to be excluded.
-
550.
N.C.C. et al. v. Pugliese et al. - [1979] 2 SCR 104 - 1979-02-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Torts
Solicitors for the appellant H.Q. Golder & Associates Limited: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa.