Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
1,094 result(s)
-
451.
R. v. D. (W.R.) - [1995] 1 SCR 758 - 1995-02-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
John A. Menzies and Scott W. Johnston, for the appellant. Michael J. Watson, Q.C., for the respondent.
-
452.
LePage Ltd. v. March et al. - [1979] 2 SCR 155 - 1979-06-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Property law
Ian G. Scott, for the other respondents. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
-
453.
Barrowman v. The Permutit Co. - [1925] SCR 685 - 1925-05-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Tilley K.C. and W. L. Scott K.C. for the appellant, Lafleur K.C., R. S. Smart and J. L. McDougall for the respondent.
-
454.
Kanthasamy v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 SCC 61 - [2015] 3 SCR 909 - 2015-12-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsImmigration
The first Chair of the Board, Janet Scott, held that humanitarian and compassionate considerations refer to “those facts, established by the evidence, which would excite in a reasonable man [sic] in a civilized community a desire to relieve the misfortunes of another — so long as these misfortunes ‘warrant the granting of [...] [15] In proceedings before the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and the House of Commons on Immigration Policy in 1975, Janet Scott elaborated on the importance of being able to guard against the unfairness of deportation in certain cases: [...] The humanitarian and compassionate discretion in s. 25(1) was, therefore, like its predecessors, seen as being a flexible and responsive exception to the ordinary operation of the Act, or, in the words of Janet Scott, a discretion “to mitigate the rigidity of the law in an appropriate case”.
-
455.
United Transportation Union v. Central Western Railway Corp. - [1990] 3 SCR 1112 - 1990-12-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Labour law
Scott, F.R. "Federal Jurisdiction Over Labour Relations ‑ A New Look" (1960), 6 McGill L.J. 153. [...] Scott in his article, "Federal Jurisdiction Over Labour Relations -‑ A New Look" (1960), 6 McGill L.J. 153, put it well when he said at p. 161: "the alternative to federal authority is not always or necessarily provincial autonomy; it may well turn out to be anarchy". [...] While Professor Scott may have overstated the case, it is my opinion that the concern which he expressed is one which deserves some recognition.
-
456.
Monaghan v. Horn - (1882) 7 SCR 409 - 1882-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsMaritime law
Mr. Scott for appellant:— The question raised by the demurrer, and on this appeal is: 1st, whether the appellant could sue for the death of her son and consequent loss of service independently of Lord Campbell’s Act; and 2nd, if she had a right to sue, whether the Maritime Court of Ontario has jurisdiction to entertain a [...] Mr. Scott in reply: If the allegation in the petition as to damages resulting to plaintiff from the loss of the services of her son as servant is not sufficient, I pray for leave to amend the petition accordingly. [...] Solicitors for appellant: Robinson, O’Brien & Scott. Solicitor for respondent: Duncan Dougall.
-
457.
Hospitality Investments Ltd. v. Everett Lord Building Construction Ltd. - [1996] 3 SCR 605 - 1996-11-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Solicitors for the interveners: Singleton, Urquhart, Scott, Vancouver.
-
458.
Merchants Bank of Canada v. Hagman - (1918) 59 SCR 662 - 1918-10-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
W. L. Scott for the respondent. [1] 13 Alfa. L.R. 293; [1918] 2 W.W.R. 377.
-
459.
R. v. Dutra - 2001 SCC 29 - [2001] 1 SCR 759 - 2001-05-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
W. J. Scott Bell, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
-
460.
R. v. Lawes - [1997] 3 SCR 694 - 1997-10-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Solicitors for the appellant: Singleton Urquhart Scott, Calgary. Solicitor for the respondent: Alberta Justice, Calgary.
-
461.
R. v. Wickstead - [1997] 1 SCR 307 - 1997-02-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Scott C. Hutchison, for the respondent. //Sopinka J.// The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
-
462.
Liquor Control Commission of Manitoba v. Carling O’Keefe Ltd. et al. - [1977] 1 SCR 99 - 1976-02-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
R.J. Scott, C.G. Labman and M.S. Rusen, for the respondents, Carling O’Keefe Ltd., Labatt’s Manitoba Brewery, Kiewel-Pelissier Breweries Ltd. and Molson’s Brewery Manitoba Ltd.
-
463.
Krawchuk v. The King - [1941] SCR 537 - 1941-07-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
W. L. Scott K.C. for the respondent. THE CHIEF JUSTICE—I have no hesitation in expressing my agreement with the conclusion of my brother Rinfret in Arcadi v. The King[1], that the courts of appeal, contemplated by section 1025 of the Criminal Code, do not include any courts other than Canadian courts.
-
464.
Lavin v. Geffen - (1920) 60 SCR 660 - 1920-11-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
APPEAL from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alberta, Appellate Division,[1] reversing the judgment of the trial judge, Scott J., who had dismissed the respondent's action and ordering a new trial.
-
465.
Stowe v. The Grand Trunk Pacific Railway Co. - (1918) 59 SCR 665 - 1918-10-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
APPEAL from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alberta, Appellate Division[1], reversing the judgment of Scott J. at the trial and dismissing the appellant's (plaintiff's) action.
-
466.
R. v. James - 2019 SCC 52 - [2019] 3 SCR 918 - 2019-11-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsScott C. Hutchison and Kelsey Flanagan, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
-
467.
Altobelli v. Pilot Insurance Co. - [1991] 3 SCR 132 - 1991-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
Solicitors for the appellants CNA Assurance Company and the Citadel General Assurance Company: Sawers, Liswood, Scott, Hickman, Toronto.
-
468.
R. v. MacIntosh - 2013 SCC 23 - [2013] 2 SCR 200 - 2013-04-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Mark Scott, for the appellant. David J. Bright, Q.C., and Brian P. Casey, for the respondent.
-
469.
Reference re Gruenke - 2000 SCC 32 - [2000] 1 SCR 836 - 2000-06-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Solicitors for the appellant: Scott Hall, Calgary. Solicitor for the respondent: The Ministry of the Attorney General, Winnipeg.
-
470.
Canadian Raybestos Co., Ltd. v. Brake Service Corp., Ltd. - [1928] SCR 61 - 1927-06-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
W. L. Scott K.C. for the respondent. [1] [1926] Ex. C.R. 187.
-
471.
Reference re Earth Future Lottery - 2003 SCC 10 - [2003] 1 SCR 123 - 2003-03-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Scott C. Hutchison, for the intervener the Attorney General of Ontario.
-
472.
Artell Developments Ltd. v. 677950 Ontario Ltd. - [1993] 2 SCR 443 - 1993-06-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
Ian G. Scott, Q.C., Richard P. Stephenson and Ian McGilp, for the appellant.
-
473.
Attorney General of Nova Scotia v. Burke - [1983] 1 SCR 55 - 1983-02-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Reinhold Enders and Alison Scott, for the appellant. Brent Cotter and Alison Crowe, for the respondent Greg Burke.
-
474.
Esmail v. Petro-Canada - [1997] 2 SCR 3 - 1996-02-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Solicitors for the applicant: Scott & Aylen, Toronto. Solicitors for the respondent: Miller Thomson, Toronto.
-
475.
Vanity Fair Silk Mills v. Commissioner of Patents - [1939] SCR 245 - 1938-12-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
W. L. Scott K.C. for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered by