Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
1,094 result(s)
-
626.
R. v. Landry - [1986] 1 SCR 145 - 1986-02-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Scott T. Milloy, for the respondent. The judgment of Dickson C.J. and Chouinard, Lamer and Wilson JJ. was delivered by [...] Solicitor for the respondent: Scott Milloy, Ottawa.
-
627.
Bradley v. The Queen - [1956] SCR 723 - 1956-06-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
The conditions existing at the place were observed by police officers Edwards, Booden and Scott and photographs were taken before the body was moved. [...] A plan prepared by Constable Scott, from measurements made by him, before the body was moved, showed the width of the lane to be 18 feet.
-
628.
Noranda Mines v. Minerals Separation Corp. - [1950] SCR 36 - 1949-12-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
E. G. Gowling K.C. and Cuthbert Scott and J. C. Osborne for the respondent. [...] Solicitors for the respondent: Ewart, Scott, Kelley and Howard. 1 [1947] Ex. C.R. 306.
-
629.
Hamilton v. The King - (1917) 54 SCR 331 - 1917-02-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
N.S. 189, at p. 193; 2 Scott 276. [15] 9 Rep. 95a. 14 2 Bing. N.S. 189, at p. 193; 2 Scott 276.
-
630.
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Canadian Pacific System Federation v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. - [1996] 2 SCR 495 - 1996-07-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
Labour law
H. C. Wendlandt and W. A. Scott Macfarlane, for the appellant. Kate A. Hughes, for the respondent.
-
631.
Maracle v. Travellers Indemnity Co. of Canada - [1991] 2 SCR 50 - 1991-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
Insurance
Solicitors for the appellant: Sawers, Liswood, Scott, Hickman, Toronto.
-
632.
Deputy Minister of National Revenue for Customs and Excise v. Ferguson Industries Ltd. et al. - [1973] SCR 21 - 1972-05-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsCustoms and excise
They had been ordered with the winches from André Brusselle Limited (Brusselle) of Belgium, but the latter had in turn ordered them from Laurence Scott & Electromotors Limited of Norwich, England, and this firm made the shipment direct to the respondent while the winches were shipped separately by Brusselle from
-
633.
Hellenius v. Lees - [1972] SCR 165 - 1971-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsMotor vehicles
The rule is conveniently and authoritatively stated in the judgment of Erle C.J., in Scott v. London & St. Katherine Docks Co.[2], where it is said:
-
634.
Ontario Jockey Club Ltd. v. McBride - [1927] SCR 84 - 1926-12-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
H.J. Scott K.C. for the respondent. [Page 85] The judgment of the majority of the court (Anglin C.J.C. and Duff, Mignault, Newcombe and Rinfret JJ.) was delivered by
-
635.
Peninsular Sugar Co. v. Howlett - [1926] SCR 18 - 1925-12-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
H.J. Scott K.C. for the appellant G.W.G. Winnett for the respondent.
-
636.
Western Assurance Company v. Caplan - [1924] SCR 227 - 1924-04-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
H.J. Scott K.C. for the respondent relied on Rockmaker v. Motor Union Ins. Co.[2] as to the application of section 194 of the Insurance Act.
-
637.
Prevost v. Bedard - (1915) 51 SCR 149 - 1915-02-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
The efficacy of illegality as an answer to the action has been recognized in Quebec in many cases, for example, in Ferguson v. Scott[12], where purchase money stipulated in a transaction arising out of a lottery was held to be non-recoverable.
-
638.
Laidlaw v. Vaughan-Rhys - (1911) 44 SCR 458 - 1911-05-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsState
Scott v. Benedict[2], decided in this court, and of which only a note is reported in our reports, was cited.
-
639.
Fraser v. Douglas - (1908) 40 SCR 384 - 1908-06-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsFamily law
Two cases, In re Wildash and Hutchison; Ex parte Miskin[4] in 1877, and Grimish v. Scott[5], indicate conclusions different from what I here reach and are worth noticing by the curious student, but the Australian Act of that time and the Manitoba Act, in the nineties, are in many respects widely different, and not least in
-
640.
Zwicker v. Feindel - (1899) 29 SCR 516 - 1899-06-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
[8] 4 M. & G. 209; 4 Scott (N. R.) 638. [9] 2 Ex. 654. [10] 2 DeG. M. & G. 339.
-
641.
The Manitoba Mortgage Company v. The Bank of Montreal - (1889) 17 SCR 692 - 1889-02-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsFinancial institutions
Christopher Robinson Q.C. for the respondents referred to Brandon v. Scott ([10]); Charles v. Blackwell ([11]); Smith v. Johnson ([12]).
-
642.
Armada Lines Ltd. v. Chaleur Fertilizers Ltd. - [1997] 2 SCR 617 - 1997-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsMaritime law
Jon H. Scott and Bruce W. Johnston, for the appellant. Thomas L. McGloan, Q.C., and Guy Spavold, for the respondent.
-
643.
McCauley v. McVey et al. - [1980] 1 SCR 165 - 1979-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Solicitors for the appellant: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa. Solicitors for the respondent McVey: Weir & Foulds, Toronto.
-
644.
Netupsky v. Craig - [1973] SCR 55 - 1972-06-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Solicitors for the plaintiffs, appellants: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa. Solicitors for the defendants, respondents: Gowling & Henderson, Ottawa.
-
645.
Bissonnette v. Cie de Finance Laval Inc. - [1963] SCR 616 - 1963-06-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
La Caisse Populaire de Scott v. Guilmette4. Dans Planiol et Ripert, 2e éd., Droit Civil, vol. 7, p. 658, on définit la dation en paie-
-
646.
Lounsbury Company Limited v. Duthie and Sinclair - [1957] SCR 590 - 1957-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Courts
Sale
On this view of the case the company is liable for its failure to effect a provident sale on principles enunciated in McHugh v. Union Bank, 10 D.L.R. 562, [1913] A.C. 299, and Vanstone & Rogers v. Scott (1908), 1 Alta.
-
647.
Electrolier Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. Dominion Manufacturing Ltd. - [1934] SCR 436 - 1934-04-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
W. L. Scott K.C. for the respondent. The judgment of the court was delivered by
-
648.
The Custodian v. Blucher - [1927] SCR 420 - 1927-04-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
See the following cases: Cockerell v. Barber[9]; Scott v. Bevan[10]; Bertram v. Duhamel[11]; Manners v. Pearson[12]; Di Ferdinando v. Simon, Smits & Co. Ltd.[13]; SS. Celia v. SS. Volturno[14]; Société des Hôtels le Touquet Paris-Plage v. Cummings[15]; In re British-American Continental Bank, Lim., Goldzieher and
-
649.
Northern Grain Co. v. Goderich Elevator & Transit Co. - [1926] SCR 120 - 1925-12-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
H.J. Scott K.C. for the respondent. The judgment of the court was delivered by
-
650.
Grand Trunk Pacific Railway Co. v. Calgary (City) - (1917) 55 SCR 103 - 1917-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
Mr. Justice Scott in In re Canadian Pacific Railway Co. and Town of Macleod[5], where, at p. 197, he says:—