Recherche avancée
- toutes les collections (4,780)
- Décisions (2,367)
- Ressources (2,169)
4,780 résultat(s)
-
3,551.
SCR | RCS [1961] - 1961-10-03
Recueil des arrêts de la Cour suprême du CanadaWilliams v. Webb et al, 27 D.L.R. (2d) 465, motion to quash granted and leave to appeal refused, June 5, 1961. [...] TABLE OF CASES CITED W—Concluded NAME OF CAGE Webber, Re Welch v. R West Kootenay Power & Light Co. v. Nelson 12 B.C.R. 34 Wightwick's Will Trusts, Re Williams v. Aristocratic Restaurants (1947) Ltd... [...] Lumley v. Gye (1853), 2 E. & B. 216; Quinn v. Leathern, [19011 A.C. 495; Lyons v. Wilkins, [1899] 1 Ch. 255, referred to; Williams v. Aristocratic Restaurants (1947) Ltd., [19511 S.C.R. 762, distinguished.
-
3,552.
SCR | RCS [1991] vol 3 - 1991-12-19
Recueil des arrêts de la Cour suprême du CanadaWilliam B. Smart, pour l'appelant. Robert A. Mulligan, pour l'intimée. [...] William E. Code, Q.C., and John Kingman Phil-c lips, for the appellant. [...] The issue is therefore Le juge lacobucci 657 Blackstone, sir William.
-
3,553.
SCR | RCS [1994] vol 1 - 1994-04-28
Recueil des arrêts de la Cour suprême du CanadaWade, William, Sir. Administrative Law, 6th ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988. [...] William A. Pearce, Q.C., and Thomas H. MacLachlan, for the respondent. [...] The Interpretation of Legislation in Canada, John Philpot and William Schabas.
-
3,554.
SCR | RCS (1880) vol 3 - 1880-04-13
Recueil des arrêts de la Cour suprême du CanadaSee .Panton y. Williams (1) ; Rev. Stat. Nova Scotia, 4th series, c. 91, sec. 266. [...] Solicitor for appellants : T. T. Wallace. 1879 ROBERT WILLIAM STANDLY et al.......APPELLANTS ; *Jan'y 23. [...] Je me contenterai de dire que je partage l'opinion exprimée à ce sujet par le juge en chef Sir William Young.
-
3,555.
In re Marriage Laws - (1912) 46 SCR 132 - 1912-06-17
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit constitutionnel
There is a very curious bit of advice which was given in 1722 and which will be found reported in 2 Peere Williams’s Reports[56]. [...] The Master of the Rolls, Sir William Grant, in The Attorney-General v. Stewart[84], is reported as citing, apparently with approval, a passage from Blackstone, vol. 1, page 100. [...] On that occasion the following opinion was given by Sir Frederick Pollock and Sir William Webb Follett (a lawyer second to none of the great lawyers of his time):—
-
3,556.
Bulletin du 22 décembre 2023 - 2023-12-22
BulletinsHaight, William Phillips Aiello FILING DATE: November 10, 2023 Albert Maxwell Lightstone
-
3,557.
Bulletin du 11 juin 2021 - 2021-06-11
BulletinsWilliams, H. Lance Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP v. (39660) Government of Yukon, As represented as the Minister of the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, et al.
-
3,558.
Immeubles Jacques Robitaille inc. c. Québec (Ville) - 2014 CSC 34 - [2014] 1 RCS 784 - 2014-05-02
Jugements de la Cour suprêmeDroit municipal
David Bernier et William Noonan, pour l’appelante. Isabelle Chouinard, Marc Desrosiers et Kathy Lévesque, pour l’intimée.
-
3,559.
Sriskandarajah c. États‑Unis d’Amérique - 2012 CSC 70 - [2012] 3 RCS 609 - 2012-12-14
Jugements de la Cour suprêmeDroit administratif
Droit constitutionnel
Blackstone, William. Commentaries on the Laws of England, 4th ed., Book I. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1770.
-
3,560.
Bulletin du 18 mai 2007 - 2007-05-18
Bulletins8. William Walker v. Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.) (Crim.) (By Leave) (31974)
-
3,561.
Bulletin du 5 juillet 2002 - 2002-07-05
BulletinsWilliam F. Ehrcke, Q.C. A.G. of British Columbia FILING DATE 19.6.2002
-
3,562.
Fontaine c. Colombie-Britannique (Official Administrator) - [1998] 1 RCS 424 - 1998-03-19
Jugements de la Cour suprêmeResponsabilité civile
Clerk, John Frederic, and William Harry Barber Lindsell. Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, 13th ed.
-
3,563.
R. c. Lemky - [1996] 1 RCS 757 - 1996-03-21
Jugements de la Cour suprêmeDroit criminel
William F. Ehrcke, pour l'intimée. //Le juge McLachlin// Version française du jugement du juge en chef Lamer et des juges La Forest, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci et Major rendu par
-
3,564.
R. c. Manninen - [1987] 1 RCS 1233 - 1987-06-25
Jugements de la Cour suprêmeDroit constitutionnel
Droit criminel
Preuve
Procureur de l'intimé: William S. Hechter, Toronto.
-
3,565.
Hillis Oil & Sales c. Wynn's Canada - [1986] 1 RCS 57 - 1986-02-28
Jugements de la Cour suprêmeContrat
Anson, Sir William R. Anson’s Law of Contract, 25th (Centenary) ed. by A. G. Guest, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1979.
-
3,566.
Duplisea c. Compagnie d’assurance-vie T. Eaton - [1980] 1 RCS 144 - 1979-06-21
Jugements de la Cour suprêmeAssurance
William Goss, pour l’intimée. [Page 146] Version française du jugement de la Cour rendu par
-
3,567.
Conklin c. Smith et autre - [1978] 2 RCS 1107 - 1978-06-29
Jugements de la Cour suprêmeResponsabilité civile
William Conklin, jr (Demandeur) Appelant; et Rodney Charles Smith et Phil Hall Ltd. (Défendeurs) Intimés.
-
3,568.
City of Halifax c. Bauditz - [1971] RCS 170 - 1970-10-21
Jugements de la Cour suprêmeExpropriation
les indemnités d’expropriation de biens-fonds devaient être accordées étaient les mêmes que ceux qui existaient alors en Angleterre; et Lord Dunedin a expressément approuvé l’énoncé de ces principes par les Juges Vaughan‑Williams et Fletcher-Moulton dans Re Lucas and Chesterfield Gas and Water Board [1909] 1 K.B. 16.
-
3,569.
King v. University of Saskatchewan - [1969] SCR 678 - 1969-06-06
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Brefs de prérogative
Buckley, Chambers, Douglas, DuWors, Katz, Langley, Ludwig, McMurray, Mann, Nind, Pepper, Rempel, D. C. Williams (I omit those not voting).
-
3,570.
Kirkpatrick et al. v. Lament - [1965] SCR 538 - 1965-04-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
William Fyfe—heard tires squealing down the street, heard Lament say “Let me go—I will go in by myself”.
-
3,571.
Kilby et al. v. Meyers et al. - [1965] SCR 24 - 1964-10-06
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Successions
The difficulty of such an insertion by order of the Court is that the Court must be able to say as a matter of necessary implication that there was an omission and what the omission was: Crook v. Hill[8], per Sir William James, L.J., at p. 315.
-
3,572.
Fallis and Deacon v. United Fuel Investments - [1963] SCR 397 - 1963-06-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit commercial
These cases are: Theis v. Spokane Falls Gaslight Co.[8]; William B. Riker & Son Co. v. United Drug Co.[9]; In re Paine[10]; In re Doe Run Lead Co.[11]; In re Security Finance Co., Rouda v. Crocker[12].
-
3,573.
Board of Education for Toronto v. Higgs et al. - [1960] SCR 174 - 1959-12-21
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
William Higgs by his next friend, John Cecil Lowings, and Helen Higgs (Plaintiffs) Respondents.
-
3,574.
Curran v. Minister of National Revenue - [1959] SCR 850 - 1959-11-02
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit fiscal
I have been unable to secure any assistance from the other cases referred to by Mr. Stikeman including Van Den Berghs Ltd. v. Clark7, a decision of the House of Lords, and the judgment of Williams J. in the High Court of Australia in Bennett v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation8.
-
3,575.
Rosen v. Anglin - [1957] SCR 755 - 1957-10-01
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Priorités et hypothèques
that the question to be tried shall be whether at the time of the seizure by the said bailiff William Tice the plaintiffs were entitled to seize, the goods and chattels seized in priority to the defendant, and whether the said mortgages to the plaintiffs were in priority to the mortgage of the defendant on the goods and