Recherche avancée
- toutes les collections (4,780)
- Décisions (2,367)
- Ressources (2,169)
4,780 résultat(s)
-
4,201.
Union Investment Co. v. Wells - (1908) 39 SCR 625 - 1908-02-18
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Lettres de change
per Tindal C.J., at page 165; Florence v. Drayson[48], per Cockburn C.J. and Cresswell J., at pages 589 and 590; Florence v. Jenings[49]; Lowry v. Williams[50], per FitzGibbon L.J., at pages 282 and 283; Ex parte Fewings[51].
-
4,202.
McMullin v. Nova Scotia Steel & Coal Co. - (1907) 39 SCR 593 - 1907-12-13
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
Then, if they desired to rely upon the qualifying words, which Williams L.J. added to his concurrence with the other members of the appeal court in the judgment of Groves v. Wimborne[7], they would stand in a position at any rate to urge the application of the doctrine so qualified to the special facts proved.
-
4,203.
Town of New Glasgow v. Brown - (1907) 39 SCR 586 - 1907-12-13
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit municipal
On or about the 5th day of December, the four defendants, without authority of the town council, and without submission of the question to the town council, and acting independently of the council, undertook to sell, and did sell, the 37 tons, 875 pounds, of water pipe, the property of the said town, to William Cooke, of
-
4,204.
Halifax Election Cases (Roche v. Hetherington / Carney v. Hetherington) - (1907) 39 SCR 401 - 1907-11-27
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Élections
William Roche (Respondent) Appellant; and Frederic W. Hetherington (Petitioner) Respondent.
-
4,205.
Manitoba Free Press Co. v. Nagy - (1907) 39 SCR 340 - 1907-11-05
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
The case of Williams v. Stephenson[16] is directly in point. There, as here, the evidence was insufficient to enable the trial judge to ascertain the damages, he guessed at the amount and this court allowed the appeal and refused to grant a new trial.
-
4,206.
Logan v. Lee - (1907) 39 SCR 311 - 1907-10-17
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Preuve
William H. Logan (Defendant) Appellant and Prank Lee (Plaintiff) Respondent.
-
4,207.
Audette v. O'Cain - (1907) 39 SCR 103 - 1907-06-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit des biens
constatés, en accordant une somme nominale, ce qui fut fait dans plusieurs espèces, particulièmenent dans Dunning v. Girouard[8]; County of Ottawa v. Montreal, Ottawa and Western Ry. Co.[9]; et ce qui fut refusé faute de preuve de dommages spéciaux, dans Williams v. Stephenson[10]; Coghlin v. La Fonderie de Joliette[11].
-
4,208.
Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. v. Carruthers - (1907) 39 SCR 251 - 1907-06-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
William Carruthers (Plaintiff) Respondent 1907: May 20; 1907: June 24.
-
4,209.
Chicoutimi Pulp Co. v. Price - (1907) 39 SCR 81 - 1907-06-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Appel
William Price (Plaintiff) Respondent. 1907: May 13, 14; 1907: June 24.
-
4,210.
City of Halifax v. The McLaughlin Carriage Co. - (1907) 39 SCR 174 - 1907-06-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Appel
Solicitor for the respondents: William F. O'Connor. [1] 39 N.S. Rep. 403.
-
4,211.
Fleming and Douglas v. McLeod - (1907) 39 SCR 290 - 1907-06-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Contrat
William McLeod (Defendant) Respondent. 1907: May 10; 1907: June 24. [...] would do nothing whatever in any way to release William McLeod or George McLeod, Sr. [...] Solicitor for the respondent: William D. Carter. [1] 37 N.B. Rep. 630.
-
4,212.
Norton v. Fulton - (1907) 39 SCR 202 - 1907-06-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit constitutionnel
William Thomas Norton (Plaintiff) Appellant; and The Honourable Frederick Fulton (Defendant) Respondent [...] Williams v. Stephenson[25]. But while I think the learned judge was right in withdrawing the case from the jury, I think the judgment on the main issue should have been for the plaintiff.
-
4,213.
Rustin v. The Fairchild Co. - (1907) 39 SCR 274 - 1907-06-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Contrat
William Rustin (Defendant) Appellant; and The Fairchild Company (Plaintiffs) Respondents.
-
4,214.
Scott v. Swanson - (1907) 39 SCR 229 - 1907-06-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Priorités et hypothèques
William James Swanson (Defendant) Respondent. and The Federal Life Assurance Company of Canada Plaintiffs;
-
4,215.
Sinclair v. Town of Owen Sound - (1907) 39 SCR 236 - 1907-06-24
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit municipal
William Henry Sinclair (Plaintiff) Appellant; and The Corporation of the Town of Owen Sound (Defendant) Respondent.
-
4,216.
Valiquette v. Fraser - (1907) 39 SCR 1 - 1907-05-13
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
John B. Fraser and William H.C. Fraser, Trading as Fraser & Co. (Defendants) Respondents.
-
4,217.
Baldocchi v. Spada - (1907) 38 SCR 577 - 1907-05-07
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Faillite et insolvabilité
Sir William Scott said over a hundred years ago, in the case of The “Odin”[1].
-
4,218.
Lafferty v. Lincoln - (1907) 38 SCR 620 - 1907-05-07
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit constitutionnel
William A. Lincoln Respondent. 1907: April 4; 1907: May 7. Present:—Fitzpatrick C.J. and Girouard, Idington, Maclennan and Duff JJ. [...] "2. That the name of said William A. Lincoln was not entered and did not appear in the said "Alberta Medical Register," and. that the said William A. Lincoln was an unregistered person within the meaning of said "The Medical Profession Act." [...] "3. That the said William A. Lincoln did on the said thirteenth day of December, 1906, practice medicine for gain in said City of Calgary.
-
4,219.
SCR | RCS (1907) vol 38 - 1907-05-07
Recueil des arrêts de la Cour suprême du Canada126 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. [VOL. XXXVIII. 1906 WILLIAM PAUL, THE YOUNGER APPELLANT; *Dec. 1. [...] A. I went to William Grant. 'He owned the land. He told me I knew the line as well as he did. [...] Sir William Scott said over a hundred years ago, in the case of The "Odin" (1) .
-
4,220.
Copeland-Chatterson Co. v. Paquette - (1907) 38 SCR 451 - 1907-04-02
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Propriété intellectuelle
Lancashire Explosives Co. v. Roburite Explosives Co.[8]; Longbottom v. Shaw[9]; Lyon v. Goddard[10]; Reiter v. Jones[11]; Simplicity is no objection; Vickers, Sons & Co. v. Siddell[12]; Hinks v. Safety Lighting Co.[13]; Perry v. Société des Lunetiers[14]; Williams v. American String-Wrapper Co.[15].
-
4,221.
The "Wandrian" v. Hatfield - (1907) 38 SCR 431 - 1907-04-02
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit maritime
This case was tried on the preliminary acts without pleadings; see Williams & Bruce's Admiralty Practice, (1886), p. 368. [...] We also rely upon The "Shannon"[9]; The "William Lindsay"[10]; The "Sisters"[11]; The "Industrie"[12]; The "Telegraph"[13]; The "Ogemaw"'[14]; The "Sapphire"[15]; The "S. Shaw"[16].
-
4,222.
In re Richard - (1907) 38 SCR 394 - 1907-03-21
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Législation
We held in the case of Williams v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.[3], that no appeal would lie to us from a refusal of a single judge to give leave to appeal.
-
4,223.
Re Daly; Daly v. Brown - (1907) 39 SCR 122 - 1907-03-07
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Successions
In Williams on Executors, 10th ed., p. 49, the law is stated to be as follows:
-
4,224.
Bartlett v. Nova Scotia Steel Co. - (1907) 38 SCR 336 - 1907-02-19
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Preuve
A. I went to William Grant. He owned the land. He told me I knew the line as well as he did. [...] Holmes, having acted upon this alleged admission of William Grant, we are told defendants are bound by what he said. [...] It is said, however, that this proceeding rests upon the admission of William Grant made in disparagement of his title under which the defendants claim.
-
4,225.
Gilbert v. The King - (1907) 38 SCR 207 - 1907-02-01
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit criminel
by Sir William Ritchie C.J., in The Glengarry Election Case ([4]), at page 460.