Applications for Leave

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No. 34957     

 

 

December 20, 2012

 

Le 20 décembre 2012

 

 

 

Coram:  Fish, Rothstein and Moldaver JJ.

 

Coram : Les juges Fish, Rothstein et Moldaver

 

 

 

 

BETWEEN:

Dale William Armstrong, Darin Lee Chung, Winch “Chuck” Chung, Wayne Mark Crawford, Leonard Frederick Goakes, George E. Houvenin, Russell Thomas Jacobson, Leonard A. Koyanagi, James Allan Mercer, Brent Alexander Mowat, Scott Ronald Nichols, Bobby Kanao Nishi, Bruce F. Probert, Stephen Henry Rawlings,  Joseph D. Smith, Dan Bertel Sundvick, Douglas Michio Suto, William Arnold David Wheeler, Robert Joseph Woof, Donald Michael Carter, John Martin Cummins, Phillip Ivar Eidsvik, Gordon David Johnson, Derrick James Wigglesworth, Michael David Wigglesworth

Applicants

- and -

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

 

ENTRE :

Dale William Armstrong, Darin Lee Chung, Winch “Chuck” Chung, Wayne Mark

Crawford, Leonard Frederick Goakes,

George E. Houvenin, Russell Thomas Jacobson, Leonard A. Koyanagi, James Allan Mercer, Brent Alexander Mowat,

Scott Ronald Nichols, Bobby Kanao Nishi, Bruce F. Probert, Stephen Henry Rawlings, Joseph D. Smith, Dan Bertel Sundvick,

Douglas Michio Suto, William Arnold David Wheeler, Robert Joseph Woof,

Donald Michael Carter,

John Martin Cummins, Phillip Ivar Eidsvik, Gordon David Johnson, Derrick James Wigglesworth, Michael David

Wigglesworth

Demandeurs

- et -

Sa Majesté la Reine

Intimée

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Numbers CA038757 and CA038758, 2012 BCCA 242, dated June 5, 2012, is dismissed without costs.

 

JUGEMENT

 

La demande d’autorisation d’appel de l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel de la Colombie-Britannique (Vancouver), numéros CA038757 et CA038758, 2012 BCCA 242, daté du 5 juin 2012, est rejetée sans dépens.

 

 

 

 

 

J.S.C.C.

J.C.S.C.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.