Applications for Leave

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

 

 

 

 

 

No. 38001     

 

 

August 30, 2018

 

Le 30 août 2018

 

 

 

BETWEEN:

Wendy Eileen McQuaid

Applicant

- and -

Government of Prince Edward Island, Scott Cameron, Steven O’Brien, C. Emerson Brooks, Barry Carruthers, Ivar Mendez, William Stanish, Keith Costello, Peter Gorman, Eric Massicotte, Regional Health Authority “B”, doing business under the name and style of Horizon Health Network and The Moncton Hospital, a facility administered by Horizon Health Network

Respondents

 

ENTRE :

Wendy Eileen McQuaid

Demanderesse

- et -

Government of Prince Edward Island, Scott Cameron, Steven O’Brien, C. Emerson Brooks, Barry Carruthers, Ivar Mendez, William Stanish, Keith Costello, Peter Gorman, Eric Massicotte, Regional Health Authority “B”, doing business under the name and style of Horizon Health Network et The Moncton Hospital, a facility administered by Horizon Health Network

 

Intimés

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal is granted. The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Prince Edward Island Court of Appeal, Number S1-CA-1341, 2017 PECA 21, dated November 15, 2017, is dismissed with costs to the respondents, Scott Cameron, Steven O’Brien, C. Emerson Brooks, Barry Carruthers, Ivar Mendez, William Stanish, Keith Costello, Peter Gorman and Eric Massicotte.

 

 

 

JUGEMENT

 

La requête en prorogation du délai de signification et de dépôt de la demande d’autorisation d’appel est accueillie. La demande d’autorisation d’appel de l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel de l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard, numéro S1-CA-1341, 2017 PECA 21, daté du 15 novembre 2017, est rejetée avec dépens en faveur des intimés, Scott Cameron, Steven O’Brien, C. Emerson Brooks, Barry Carruthers, Ivar Mendez, William Stanish, Keith Costello, Peter Gorman et Eric Massicotte.

 

 

 

 

J.S.C.C.

J.C.S.C.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.