BETWEEN: Vass Pipe and Steel Co. Inc. Applicant - and - Fluor Canada Ltd. Respondent AND BETWEEN: EMCO Corporation carrying on business under the firm name and style Westlund Applicant - and - Fluor Canada Ltd. Respondent AND BETWEEN: ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Roman S.A., formerly known as Mittal Steel Roman S.A. and Mittal Steel North America Inc. Applicants - and - Fluor Canada Ltd. Respondent AND BETWEEN: BHD Tubular Limited Applicant - and - Fluor Canada Ltd. Respondent AND BETWEEN: Fluor Canada Ltd. Applicant - and - Vass Pipe and Steel Co. Inc., EMCO Corporation carrying on business under the firm name and style Westlund, ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Roman S.A., formerly known as Mittal Steel Roman S.A., Mittal Steel North America Inc. and BHD Tubular Limited Respondents |
|
ENTRE : Vass Pipe and Steel Co. Inc. Demanderesse - et - Fluor Canada Ltd. Intimée ET ENTRE : EMCO Corporation faisant affaire sous la raison sociale Westlund Demanderesse - et - Fluor Canada Ltd. Intimée ET ENTRE : ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Roman S.A., auparavant connue sous le nom de Mittal Steel Roman S.A. et Mittal Steel North America Inc. Demanderesses - et - Fluor Canada Ltd. Intimée ET ENTRE : BHD Tubular Limited Demanderesse - et - Fluor Canada Ltd. Intimée ET ENTRE : Fluor Canada Ltd. Demanderesse - et - Vass Pipe and Steel Co. Inc., EMCO Corporation, faisant affaire sous la raison sociale Westlund, ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Roman S.A., auparavant connue sous le nom de Mittal Steel Roman S.A., Mittal Steel North America Inc. et BHD Tubular Limited Intimées |
JUDGMENT The applications for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Alberta (Calgary), Number 1201-0338-AC, 2013 ABCA 279, dated August 6, 2013, are dismissed with costs. The application for leave to cross-appeal is dismissed with costs. |
|
JUGEMENT Les demandes d’autorisation d’appel de l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel de l’Alberta (Calgary), numéro 1201-0338-AC, 2013 ABCA 279, daté du 6 août 2013, sont rejetées avec dépens. La demande d’autorisation d’appel incident est rejetée avec dépens. |