Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
4,782 result(s)
-
3,651.
SCR | RCS [1991] vol 3 - 1991-12-19
Canada Supreme Court ReportsWilliam B. Smart, pour l'appelant. Robert A. Mulligan, pour l'intimée. [...] William E. Code, Q.C., and John Kingman Phil-c lips, for the appellant. [...] The issue is therefore Le juge lacobucci 657 Blackstone, sir William.
-
3,652.
In re Marriage Laws - (1912) 46 SCR 132 - 1912-06-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
There is a very curious bit of advice which was given in 1722 and which will be found reported in 2 Peere Williams’s Reports[56]. [...] The Master of the Rolls, Sir William Grant, in The Attorney-General v. Stewart[84], is reported as citing, apparently with approval, a passage from Blackstone, vol. 1, page 100. [...] On that occasion the following opinion was given by Sir Frederick Pollock and Sir William Webb Follett (a lawyer second to none of the great lawyers of his time):—
-
3,653.
SCR | RCS [1994] vol 1 - 1994-04-28
Canada Supreme Court ReportsWade, William, Sir. Administrative Law, 6th ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988. [...] William A. Pearce, Q.C., and Thomas H. MacLachlan, for the respondent. [...] The Interpretation of Legislation in Canada, John Philpot and William Schabas.
-
3,654.
SCR | RCS (1880) vol 3 - 1880-04-13
Canada Supreme Court ReportsSee .Panton y. Williams (1) ; Rev. Stat. Nova Scotia, 4th series, c. 91, sec. 266. [...] Solicitor for appellants : T. T. Wallace. 1879 ROBERT WILLIAM STANDLY et al.......APPELLANTS ; *Jan'y 23. [...] Je me contenterai de dire que je partage l'opinion exprimée à ce sujet par le juge en chef Sir William Young.
-
3,655.
Bulletin of April 9, 2021 - 2021-04-09
BulletinsKlym, William DD West LLP v. (39582) Attorney General of Canada, et al.
-
3,656.
Agenda - 2016-05-09
News ReleasesDianna Louise Parsons, deceased by her Estate Administrator, William John Forsyth et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario et al.
-
3,657.
Bulletin of December 24, 2015 - 2015-12-24
BulletinsWilliam Rallis v. (36764) Law Society of Upper Canada (Ont.) Catherine Phillips
-
3,658.
Stuart Olson Dominion Construction Ltd. v. Structal Heavy Steel - 2015 SCC 43 - [2015] 3 SCR 127 - 2015-09-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsKevin T. Williams and Kyla A. Pedersen, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered by
-
3,659.
R. v. O'Brien - 2011 SCC 29 - [2011] 2 SCR 485 - 2011-06-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Kenneth W. F. Fiske, Q.C., and William D. Delaney, for the appellant.
-
3,660.
Bulletin of July 25, 2008 - 2008-07-25
BulletinsWilliam E. Nurse (Ont.) Sally P. Bryant McCarthy Tétrault FILING DATE: 16.06.2008
-
3,661.
Canada (Justice) v. Khadr - 2008 SCC 28 - [2008] 2 SCR 125 - 2008-05-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Evidence
[11] Also included in the first application is an affidavit from Lt. Cdr. William Kuebler, Mr. Khadr’s defence counsel in the military commission proceedings, updating the Court on developments in relevant U.S. law.
-
3,662.
Bulletin of September 2, 2005 - 2005-09-02
BulletinsWilliam B. Hembroff Bryan & Company FILING DATE: 18.8.2005 George Leger, et al.
-
3,663.
Bulletin of September 17, 2004 - 2004-09-17
BulletinsWilliam Assaf, et al. v. (30139) Henry Koury, et al. (Ont.) Requête en obtention d’une ordonnance enjoignant de suspendre la demande d’autorisation d’appel
-
3,664.
Bulletin of August 30, 2002 - 2002-08-30
BulletinsWilliam McAllister, Q.C. Boughton, Peterson, Yang, Anderson v. (29317)
-
3,665.
Bulletin of August 23, 2002 - 2002-08-23
BulletinsRobert William, on his own behalf and on behalf of all other members of the Xeni Gwet’in First Nations Goverment and on behalf of all other members of the Tsilhqot’ in Nation, et al.
-
3,666.
Bulletin of February 25, 2000 - 2000-02-25
BulletinsWilliam Craik and Lee Kirkpatrick, for the intervener the Government of the Yukon Territory.
-
3,667.
Morris v. The Queen - [1983] 2 SCR 190 - 1983-10-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsEvidence
Proof of the motive for a crime is generally admitted as circumstantial evidence: in his Textbook of Criminal Law, Glanville Williams writes at p. 56:
-
3,668.
R. v. Faid - [1983] 1 SCR 265 - 1983-03-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Professor Glanville Williams in his Textbook of Criminal Law (1978), at p. 480, makes the point that in order to have the defence of provocation the defendant must have killed because he was provoked, not merely because provocation existed.
-
3,669.
Goodman v. Rompkey et al. - [1982] 1 SCR 589 - 1982-05-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
The Honourable William Rompkey and the Attorney General of Canada Respondents.
-
3,670.
Fulton et al. v. Energy Resources Conservation Board et al. - [1981] 1 SCR 153 - 1981-01-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William Henkel, Q.C., for the Attorney General of Alberta. T.B. Smith, Q.C., for the Attorney General of Canada.
-
3,671.
Attorney General (Que.) v. Kellogg’s Co. of Canada et al. - [1978] 2 SCR 211 - 1978-01-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William Henkel, Q.C., for the Attorney-General of Alberta. Ken Lysyk, Q.C., and G.V. Peacock, for the Attorney-General of Saskatchewan.
-
3,672.
Kirzner v. R. - [1978] 2 SCR 487 - 1977-12-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Professor Glanville Williams in his work The Criminal Law, The General Part (2nd ed. 1961) at p. 785 says this:
-
3,673.
Cotroni v. Quebec Police Commission - [1978] 1 SCR 1048 - 1977-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Courts
Although the Code does not say it explicitly, it seems to me that the principle stated by Vaughan Williams J. in Re Armstrong[11], (cited in Poje[12], at p. 519) would apply and that the imprisonment should end ex debito justitiae as soon as the person incarcerated agrees to comply with the order of the court, just as the
-
3,674.
Morgan et al. v. A.G. (P.E.I.) et al. - [1976] 2 SCR 349 - 1975-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William Henkel, Q.C., for the intervenant, the Attorney General of Alberta.
-
3,675.
Penvidic v. International Nickel - [1976] 1 SCR 267 - 1975-01-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Torts
‘If in the contract one finds the time limited within which the builder is to do the work, that means, not only that he is to do it within that time, but it means also that he is to have that time within which to do it.’ (Per Vaughan Williams L.J. in Wells v. Army & Navy Co‑operative Society (1902) 86 L.T. 764; Hudson’s