Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
2,511 result(s)
-
2,501.
SCR | RCS [2015] vol 1 - 2015-04-14
Canada Supreme Court ReportsEchlin, Randall Scott, and Jennifer M. Fantini. Quitting for Good Reason: The Law of Constructive Dismissal in Canada. [...] Echlin, Randall Scott, and Jennifer M. Fantini. Quitting for Good Reason : The Law of Constructive Dismissal in Canada, Aurora (Ont.), Canada Law Book, 2001. [...] Echlin, Randall Scott, and Jennifer M. Fantini. Quitting for Good Reason: The Law of Constructive Dismissal in Canada.
-
2,502.
Part 3, 2019 Vol. 1 ([2019] 1 S.C.R. i-xlix 573-843) - 2019-02-28
Canada Supreme Court ReportsToronto: Carswell, 1994. ....................................... 208 LaFave, Wayne R. and Austin W. Scott, Jr. Substantive Criminal Law, vol. 1, 2nd ed.
-
2,503.
SCR | RCS (1912) vol 46 - 1912-10-07
Canada Supreme Court ReportsIt 1912 may be open to argue that such holding as in the IN RE Millis Case (1) is not, and that the holding by Sir NILBArs William Scott in Dalrymple v. Dalrymple (2), is law IdingtonJ: in Canada unless where declared otherwise.
-
2,504.
SCR | RCS [1944] - 1944-11-23
Canada Supreme Court ReportsSolicitors for the respondent: MacDougall, McFarlane, Scott (Pc Hugessen.
-
2,505.
SCR | RCS [1984] vol 1 - 1984-06-21
Canada Supreme Court ReportsThe Schooner "Washington" Case, reported in Scott, Cases on International Law (1922), at p. 229, was adjudicated by the American and British Claims Commission in 1855. [...] siècle, une baie dont les riva-ges sont partagés par deux pays n'aurait fait partie des eaux territoriales de ni l'un ni l'autre pays. b L'affaire Schooner «Washington», publiée dans Scott, Cases on International Law (1922), à la p. 229, a fait l'objet d'un arbitrage en 1855 devant l'American and British Claims Commission.
-
2,506.
SCR | RCS [1953] vol 2 - 1953-11-25
Canada Supreme Court ReportsM. M. Grosman, Q.C. and C. F. Scott for appellant. A. S. Gregory for the respondents.
-
2,507.
SCR | RCS [1970] - 1970-11-23
Canada Supreme Court ReportsScott v. The Queen (Alta.), leave to appeal refused, 29.6.70, autorisation d'appeler refusée. [...] Redlac v xi R., Goodwin v v R., Rickard v 1022 R., Great West News Ltd. et al. y ix R., Ritchie v xi R., Haig v ix R., Sanders v 109 R., Heathfield v ix R., Scott v xi R., Hendricks v 237 R., Shepherd v xi R., Hewitt v vi R., Solowan v 440 R., Hewitt v ix R. v. Stenning 631 R., Humphries v. ix R., Szoboszloi v xi R., [...] vi Sanders v. The Queen 109 Sandwich West, Corporation of the Township, City of Detroit v 627 Savage, Fribourg Investment Inc. v ix Sawyer, St-Germain v vi Scott v. The Queen xi Senkiw et al. v. Muzyka et al vi Shepherd v. The Queen xi Sept-Iles, Cité des, Labrecque v ix Sigouin et vir. v. Lévis vi Sigurdson et al. v.
-
2,508.
SCR | RCS [1943] - 1943-10-18
Canada Supreme Court ReportsThese are well indicated in the following excerpt from a pronouncement of the greatest expositor of this field of law, Sir William Scott (as he then was) (4) : I do not find any express text, that applies to the particular case of granting a legal separation to a husband, who had remained constant to his marriage bed till
-
2,509.
SCR | RCS [2005] vol 1 - 2005-06-10
Canada Supreme Court ReportsScott C. Norton, Q.C., and Daniela Bassan, for the respondent. The judgment of McLachlin C.J. and Major, Binnie, Deschamps and Fish JJ. was delivered by THE CHIEF JUSTICE - I. Introduction This is the sad case of a couple, Ms. Marche and Mr. Fitzgerald, who purchased the latter's family home, converted it to two apartments [...] Scott C. Norton, c.r., et Daniela Bassan, pour l'intimée. Version française du jugement de la juge en chef McLachlin et des juges Major, Binnie, Deschamps et Fish rendu par LA JUGE EN CHEF - I. Introduction Il s'agit de la triste affaire d'un couple, Mme Marche et M. Fitzgerald, qui a fait l'acquisition de la maison de
-
2,510.
SCR | RCS [2014] vol 2 - 2014-09-19
Canada Supreme Court ReportsSuperintendent of Motor Vehicles v. Scott, (B.C.), 35739, leave to appeal refused with costs, 29.5.14, autorisation d’appel refusée avec dépens.
-
2,511.
SCR | RCS [2008] vol 1 - 2008-05-09
Canada Supreme Court ReportsScott v. Blacher, (Ont.), 32285, leave to appeal refused with costs, 24.1.08, demande d'autorisation d'appel refusée avec dépens.