Advanced Search
- All Databases (1,254)
- Decisions (530)
- Resources (724)
1,254 result(s)
-
901.
O'Brien v. Procureur Général de la Province de Québec - [1961] SCR 184 - 1960-12-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Allen O'Brien (Plaintiff) Appellant; and Le Procureur Général de la Province de Québec (Defendant) Respondent.
-
902.
SCR | RCS [1960] - 1960-11-21
Canada Supreme Court ReportsAs it was said by Lord Dunedin in Sorrell v. Smith', in summarizing what had been decided in Mogul Steamship Company v. M'Gregor 2, Allen v. Flood3 and Quinn v. Leathem4, even though the dominating motive in a certain course of action may be the furtherance of your own business or your own interests, you are not entitled to [...] It was shown by the evidence of Allen D. Christensen, the president of the appellant company, that the iron content of the ore in the appellant's mine was only sufficient to yield a very narrow margin of profit on the available export market. [...] (ii) It has been decided by this Court, notably in Provincial Secretary of P.E.I. v. Egan' and in O'Brien v. Allen2, that the field of regulation of highway traffic within a province is wholly provincial.
-
903.
O'Grady v. Sparling - [1960] SCR 804 - 1960-10-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
(ii) It has been decided by this Court, notably in Provincial Secretary of P.E.I. v. Egan18 and in O'Brien v. Allen19, that the field of regulation of highway traffic within a province is wholly provincial.
-
904.
Texada Mines Ltd. v. Attorney-General of British Columbia - [1960] SCR 713 - 1960-06-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
It was shown by the evidence of Allen D. Christensen, the president of the appellant company, that the iron content of the ore in the appellant's mine was only sufficient to yield a very narrow margin of profit on the available export market.
-
905.
International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Therien - [1960] SCR 265 - 1960-01-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
As it was said by Lord Dunedin in Sorrell v. Smith[15], in summarizing what had been decided in Mogul Steamship Company v. M'Gregor[16], Allen v. Flood[17] and Quinn v. Leathem[18], even though the dominating motive in a certain course of action may be the furtherance of your own business or your own interests, you are not
-
906.
Canadian Admiral Corporation v. Deputy Minister of National Revenue - [1959] SCR 832 - 1959-11-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
Solicitors for the Canadian Electrical, Manufacturers Association: Hume, Martin & Allen, Toronto.
-
907.
SCR | RCS [1959] - 1959-11-02
Canada Supreme Court ReportsIt is the application to such a privilege of the proposition urged but rejected in Allen v. Flood in the case of a private employment. [...] Solicitors for the Alberta Wheat Pool and United Grain Growers Limited, respondents: Allen, MacKimmie, Mat-thews & Wood, Calgary. [...] Solicitors for the Canadian Electrical Manufacturers Association: Hume, Martin & Allen, Toronto:
-
908.
Sommers and Gray v. The Queen - [1959] SCR 678 - 1959-06-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
The case of The Queen v. Allen[9] shows that the interpretation contended for by the appellants does not obtain in cases where, as in the present. it would, in the result, leave untouched a portion of the mischief aimed at by the enactment.
-
909.
Molner v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. et al. - [1959] SCR 592 - 1959-04-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
Solicitors for respondents, Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. and Rempel Construction Co.: Allen, MacKimmie, Matthews, Wood, Phillips & Smith, Calgary.
-
910.
Minister of Agriculture of British Columbia v. Canadian National Railway et al. - [1959] SCR 229 - 1959-01-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
Solicitors for the Alberta Wheat Pool and United Grain Growers Limited, respondents: Allen, MacKimmie, Matthews & Wood, Calgary.
-
911.
Roncarelli v. Duplessis - [1959] SCR 121 - 1959-01-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsState
In Allen v. Flood, the actor was a labour leader and the victims non-union workmen who were lawfully dismissed by their employer to avoid a strike involving no breach of contract or law. [...] In Allen v. Flood there were no such elements. Nor is it necessary to examine the question whether on the basis of an improper revocation the appellant could have compelled the issue of a new permit or whether the purported revocation was a void act. [...] It is the application to such a privilege of the proposition urged but rejected in Allen v. Flood in the case of a private employment.
-
912.
SCR | RCS [1958] - 1958-11-20
Canada Supreme Court Reports(11 Allen) 157. 2 (1812), 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 116. 3 (1880), 5 PD. 197. [...] Solicitors for the appellant: Allen, MacKimmie, Matthews & Wood, Calgary. [...] A. E. Hoskin, Q.C., J. Allen, Q.C., and J. H. Stitt, Q.C., for the appellant.
-
913.
The Attorney-General for Manitoba v. Canadian Pacific Railway Company et al. - [1958] SCR 744 - 1958-11-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
A. E. Hoskin, Q.C., J. Allen, Q.C., and J. H. Stitt, Q.C., for the appellant. [...] Solicitors for the appellant: A. E. Hoskin and J. Allen, Winnipeg. Solicitors for the respondent: H. A. V. Green and H. M. Pickard, Winnipeg.
-
914.
Minerals Limited v. The Minister of National Revenue - [1958] SCR 490 - 1958-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
Solicitors for the appellant: Allen, MacKimmie, Matthews & Wood, Calgary.
-
915.
The Municipality of the City and County of Saint-John et al. v. Fraser-Brace Overseas Corporation et al. - [1958] SCR 263 - 1958-04-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsInternational law
Taxation
(11 Allen) 157. 20 (1812), 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 116. 21 (1880), 5 P.D. 197.
-
916.
Midcon Oil & Gas Limited v. New British Dominion Oil Company Limited and Thomas L. Brook - [1958] SCR 314 - 1958-02-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
Trust
Solicitors for the defendant, respondent: Allen, MacKimmie, Matthews & Wood, Calgary.
-
917.
Robert v. Marquis and Lussier - [1958] SCR 20 - 1957-11-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
Now, before discussing the case of Allen v. Flood ([1898] A.C.1) and what was decided therein, there are two observations of a general character which I wish to make, and one is to repeat what I have very often said before, that every judgment must be read as applicable to the particular facts proved, or assumed to be
-
918.
SCR | RCS [1957] - 1957-11-18
Canada Supreme Court ReportsWe have examples which are clear in legal features, TIINNEY such as marriage, but the difficulty of bringing them under Rand J. a general conception or principle is demonstrated in the comprehensive exposition given the subject by Dr. Carleton K. Allen in (1930), 46 L.Q.R. 277. [...] In an 'action brought against John Milley and George Stewart Nash, administrator ad litem of the estate of Murley Milley, deceased, damages were awarded to the respondent Florence Bell in the sum of $6,000 and to the respondent Allen Bell in the sum of $48,228.05. [...] There is, therefore, no room for the applica- MAnsHALL tion of the doctrine contra pro f erentem and none of the AND VAN ALLEN decisions relied upon by the appellants in that connection v applies.
-
919.
Monarch Towing & Trading Co. Ltd. v. British Columbia Cement Co. Ltd. - [1957] SCR 816 - 1957-10-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
8. That during the course of the said voyage, the tug "Protective" was under command of one James Stuart Allen, Master.
-
920.
The Queen v. Neil - [1957] SCR 685 - 1957-10-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Had the matter been one for determination by a jury it would be my opinion that the improper admission of this evidence would have necessitated a rehearing for the reasons stated by Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C.J. in Allen v. The King 1, and by Lord Herschell L.C. in Makin et ux. v. The Attorney-General for New South Wales 2.
-
921.
Marshall and Van Allen v. Crown Assets Disposal Corp. - [1957] SCR 656 - 1957-09-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
Marshall and Van Allen v. Crown Assets Disposal Corp., [1957] SCR 656 [...] Marshall and Van Allen v. Crown Assets Disposal Corp., [1957] S.C.R. 656 [...] Maynard Boyce Marshall and Harry Alvin Van Allen (Plaintiffs) Appellants;
-
922.
Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bell - [1957] SCR 581 - 1957-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
In an action brought against John Milley and George Stewart Nash, administrator ad litem of the estate of Murley Milley, deceased, damages were awarded to the respondent Florence Bell in the sum of $6,000 and to the respondent Allen Bell in the sum of $48,228.05.
-
923.
Orchard v. Tunney - [1957] SCR 436 - 1957-05-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
We have examples which are clear in legal features, such as marriage, but the difficulty of bringing them under a general conception or principle is demonstrated in the comprehensive exposition given the subject by Dr. Carleton K. Allen in (1930), 46 L.Q.R. 277.
-
924.
SCR | RCS [1956] - 1956-11-14
Canada Supreme Court ReportsAllen v. The King Anderson v. Fitzgerald Andrews v. Director of Public Prosecutions... [...] (Makin v. A.G. for New South Wales [1894] A.C. 57 and Allen v. The King 44 S.C.R. 331 followed). [...] Allen v. The King (1). Les circonstances établies, ne laissaient aucune alternative au jury.
-
925.
Parkes v. The Queen - [1956] SCR 768 - 1956-10-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
As to this, I refer to what was said by Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C.J., with whom Duff J. (as he then was) agreed, in Allen v. The King[12]:— [...] While the trial referred to in Allen’s Case was before a jury, these remarks, in my opinion, apply with equal force to a hearing such as this before a single judge where the reasons delivered indicate that he relied, at least in part, upon evidence which was not properly before him.