Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
4,782 result(s)
-
3,801.
Peggy Sage Inc. v. Siegel Kahn Co. of Canada - [1935] SCR 539 - 1935-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
William Arbuckle says that the dominant feature of the trade-mark is “Peggy” and that the people usually ask for “Peggy Sage” and at odd times “Peggy.”
-
3,802.
Scott v. Heninger - [1935] SCR 408 - 1935-06-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsLease
William Stott and Sarah Stott (Defendants) Appellants; and Ellis A. Heninger (Plaintiff) Respondent
-
3,803.
The King v. Dominion Building Corp. Ltd. - [1935] SCR 338 - 1935-05-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
It is in evidence that, at the time of the breach, the William Wrigley Jr. Co. Ltd. were willing to purchase through Anglin the two lots at the north-west corner of Yonge and King streets for $2,000,005, but were insisting for the transfer of the two government leases, of which, at the time, only one had been secured. [...] On September 25, William Wrigley Jr. Company Limited made an offer to Anglin to purchase the corner property and the Home Bank property.
-
3,804.
Begley v. Imperial Bank of Canada - [1935] SCR 89 - 1934-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
E. K. Williams K.C. for the respondent. The judgment of Duff C.J. and Crocket and Hughes JJ. and of Maclean J. ad hoc was delivered by
-
3,805.
MacInnes v. MacInnes - [1935] SCR 200 - 1934-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
It was held by Vaughan Williams, L.J., and Kennedy, L.J., that the word “then” referred to the date of the nomination, Farwell, L.J., dissenting. [...] Vaughan Williams, L.J., said, at page 282:— The view which I am taking is not a novel view, because in In the Goods of Baxter[7], this very question was raised and decided. [...] Kennedy, L.J., agreed with the judgment of Vaughan Williams, L.J. In his dissenting judgment, Farwell, L.J., said, at page 284:
-
3,806.
SCR | RCS [1934] - 1934-11-20
Canada Supreme Court ReportsE. K. Williams K.C. for the appellant. F. L. Bastedo K.C. for the respondent. [...] Lucien Gendron K.C., Oscar Gagnon and William Paradis for the appellant. [...] Solicitor for the appellant: William Paradis. Solicitor for the respondent: Valmore Bienvenue.
-
3,807.
Riach v. Ferris - [1934] SCR 725 - 1934-10-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
The plaintiff (the present respondent) propounded for probate an alleged will of William Everton Wright, deceased, made on March 1, 1932. [...] of the alleged last will and testament of William E. Wright, deceased, late of the city of Windsor.
-
3,808.
Delco Appliance Corp. v. Selby - [1934] SCR 684 - 1934-06-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsLease
William Dunbar Selby and Others (Plaintiffs) Respondents. 1934: May 15; 1934: June 15. [...] And in further consideration the said party of the second part binds and obliges himself to pay to the said William Dunbar Selby et al. at the office of Frank H. Hopkins in the city of Montreal as the said William Dunbar Selby et al. may indicate in writing, an annual rent of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000.00) until the
-
3,809.
Alberta (Attorney-General) v. Underwood - [1934] SCR 635 - 1934-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William Kenneth Underwood (Defendant) Respondent; and The Attorney General of Canada (Intervener) [...] RINFRET J.—The appellant, Gertrude Mary Neilson, by her next friend, her mother, brought this action for a declaration that the ceremony of marriage solemnized between her and the respondent, William Kenneth Underwood, on the 26th day of August, 1932, at the town of Okotoks, in the province of Alberta, was not valid, and to [...] The action of Gertrude Mary Neilson will accordingly be maintained; and it will be declared that her pretended marriage with the respondent William Kenneth Underwood was null and void and is therefore annulled.
-
3,810.
Baker v. Dumaresq - [1934] SCR 665 - 1934-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
After her death I direct that the balance of my estate remaining in her hands shall be divided between my brother, the Rev. William W. Weeks, and my sister, Carrie Dumaresque. [...] Should my brother, William W., predecease my said sister, the whole of said balance shall go to my said sister and her heirs.
-
3,811.
Dozois v. Pure Spring Co. Ltd. and Ottawa Gas Co. - [1935] SCR 319 - 1934-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
William Delorme, another witness for the defendants, was called on the 20th December because there had been a complaint of a gas leak.
-
3,812.
Robertson v. Quinlan - [1934] SCR 550 - 1934-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsEvidence
Angus William Robertson (Defendant) Appellant: and Ethel Quinlan and Others (Plaintiffs) Respondents; [...] (11) that on or about the 22nd day of June, 1927, three days before the said testator died, said Angus William Robertson, one of the defendants, personally and for his own benefit, acquired a number of shares, the property of the testator, in different companies;
-
3,813.
Anderson, Greene & Co. Ltd. v. Kickley - [1934] SCR 388 - 1934-03-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
William S. Kickley (Plaintiff) Respondent. 1934: February 15; 1934: March 6.
-
3,814.
In re Estate of Brown (deceased) - [1934] SCR 324 - 1934-03-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
On the death of my said son, William George Hamilton Browne, I DIRECT that the said fund of $100,000 is to be divided as follows: [...] The rule itself, as stated in Williams (12th Ed., p. 795), is made subject to many qualifications. [...] Each will must be construed according to the apparent intention of the testator (Williams on Executors, 12th ed., p. 726).
-
3,815.
In re Hammond - [1934] SCR 403 - 1934-03-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
The learned judge of first instance based his decision on the rule “laid down in Williams on Executors, 11th Ed., p. 981” (now: 12th Edition, p. 795) and referred to our judgment in Busch v. Eastern Trust Company[1], where, applying the rule to the peculiar circumstances of that case, we held that the vesting was postponed [...] Indeed, the rule itself relied on by the learned judge, as stated in Sir Edward Vaughan Williams’ treatise, contains the qualifying words: “unless, from particular circumstances, a contrary intention is to be collected.”
-
3,816.
Clarkson v. Tod - [1934] SCR 230 - 1934-02-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
The only part of this case that seems to have any bearing is the statement of Vaughan Williams, J., at p. 431, where he says: [...] Vaughan Williams, L.J., quotes with approval the language of Cozens-Hardy, L.J., in Bailey v. Thurston[31]. [...] and it will be seen that in the quotation from the reasons of Vaughan Williams, J., in In re Rogers, Ex parte Collins[44],
-
3,817.
Gooderham v. City of Toronto - [1934] SCR 158 - 1934-01-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
William G. Gooderham, one of the trustees of the estate of the late george gooderham (Plaintiff) Appellant; [...] APPEAL by William G. Gooderham, one of the trustees of the estate of George Gooderham, deceased, from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissing the appeal of said appellant from the judgment of His Honour Judge Denton, Senior Judge of the County Court of the County of York, dismissing the appeal of said [...] 6. The assessor, in the assessment roll prepared in the year 1932 upon which taxes for the year 1933 will be levied, has assessed William G. Gooderham, one of the trustees under the will of the said late George Gooderham, for the said sum of $73,083 (the income shown by the said return).
-
3,818.
Carrel v. Hart - [1934] SCR 10 - 1933-12-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
This mortgage was assigned on the same day to the appellant, and on the same day Millie Guild made a mortgage on No. 2-4, registered No. 24681 W.A., to William W. Watt, which mortgage was assigned by Watt on the 5th November, 1929, to one Oluf Albrechtsen. [...] At the same time Millie Guild made four separate mortgages on the other four buildings to William W. Watt, her vendor, and these four mortgages were all assigned to one Arthur.
-
3,819.
New Regina Trading Co. v. The Canadian Credit Men's Trust Assn. - [1934] SCR 47 - 1933-12-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
E. K. Williams K.C. for the appellant. F. L. Bastedo K.C. for the respondent.
-
3,820.
Paradis v. The King - [1934] SCR 165 - 1933-12-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Lucien Gendron K.C., Oscar Gagnon and William Paradis for the appellant. [...] Solicitor for the appellant: William Paradis. Solicitor for the respondent: Valmore Bienvenue.
-
3,821.
The King v. Attorney-General of Ontario and Forrest - [1934] SCR 133 - 1933-12-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
The Attorney-General of Ontario And William L. Forrest (Defendants) Respondents.
-
3,822.
SCR | RCS [1933] - 1933-11-15
Canada Supreme Court ReportsIn the certificate, the name of David's father is given as William Fitzgerald. [...] A. R. WILLIAMS MACHINERY & *May 12. SUPPLY COMPANY, LIMITED APPELLANT; *June 28. [...] WILLIAMS Il appert que ce document fut enregistré à Chicoutimi le MACHINERY & SUPPLY 16 avril 1928.
-
3,823.
The King v. McLean - [1933] SCR 688 - 1933-11-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
William McLean Appellant; and His Majesty the King Respondent 1933: November 10, 15.
-
3,824.
Kerr v. Kerr - [1934] SCR 72 - 1933-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
William James Kerr (Plaintiff) Appellant; and Frances Margaret Kerr and The Attorney-General for The Province of Ontario (Defendants) Respondents.
-
3,825.
A. R. Williams Machinery & Supply Co. Ltd. v. Morin - [1933] SCR 570 - 1933-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
A. R. Williams Machinery & Supply Co. Ltd. v. Morin, , [1933] SCR 570 [...] A. R. Williams Machinery & Supply Co. Ltd. v. Morin, [1933] S.C.R. 570 [...] A. R. Williams Machinery & Supply Company, Limited (Intervenant) Appellant;