Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
2,511 result(s)
-
1,901.
SCR | RCS [1973] - 1973-05-07
Canada Supreme Court ReportsSolicitors for the defendant, appellant: Cam-eron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto. [...] Solicitors for plaintif s, appellants: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto. [...] Procureurs des demandeurs, appelants: Cam-eron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto.
-
1,902.
Epstein v. Reymes - [1973] SCR 85 - 1972-06-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
Property law
I.G. Scott, for the plaintiff, appellant, Alexander Epstein. R.N. Starr, Q.C., for the defendant, respondent. [...] Solicitors for plaintiffs, appellants: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto.
-
1,903.
Netupsky v. Craig - [1973] SCR 55 - 1972-06-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Solicitors for the plaintiffs, appellants: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa. Solicitors for the defendants, respondents: Gowling & Henderson, Ottawa.
-
1,904.
Polai v. City of Toronto - [1973] SCR 38 - 1972-06-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
I.G. Scott, for the defendant, appellant. D.C. Lyons and M.J. Winer, for the plaintiff, respondent. [...] Solicitors for the defendant, appellant: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto.
-
1,905.
SCR | RCS [1972] - 1972-06-29
Canada Supreme Court ReportsThe rule is conveniently and authoritatively stated in the judgment of Erle C.J., in Scott v. London & St. Katherine Docks Co. 2, where it is said: There must be reasonable evidence of negligence. [...] Solicitors for the defendants, appellants, Vic-toria Phillips and Kenneth Meredith: Meredith, Marshall, McConnell & Scott, Vancouver. [...] Procureurs des défendeurs, appelants, Victoria Phillips et Kenneth Meredith: Meredith, Marshall, McConnell & Scott, Vancouver.
-
1,906.
Woolaston v. Minister of Manpower and Immigration - [1973] SCR 102 - 1972-06-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsImmigration
Solicitors for the appellants: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: S.F. Froomkin, Ottawa.
-
1,907.
Deputy Minister of National Revenue for Customs and Excise v. Ferguson Industries Ltd. et al. - [1973] SCR 21 - 1972-05-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsCustoms and excise
They had been ordered with the winches from André Brusselle Limited (Brusselle) of Belgium, but the latter had in turn ordered them from Laurence Scott & Electromotors Limited of Norwich, England, and this firm made the shipment direct to the respondent while the winches were shipped separately by Brusselle from
-
1,908.
Corporation des Opticiens d’ordonnances du Québec v. Valentine et al. - [1972] SCR 478 - 1971-12-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Also inapplicable is Watt & Scott, Ltd. v. The City of Montreal[6], in which appellant had brought two separate suits against the City, and the Court, in accordance with art. 291 and 292 of the old Code of Civil Procedure—now 270 and 271 of the new Code—ordered that these suits be joined for purposes of evidence only. [...] In Watt & Scott, Ltd. v. City of Montreal[14], appellant had brought two separate actions in succession against the municipality for damages resulting from sewage system overflow on two different occasions. [...] The only difference between the present case and the Watt & Scott case is that here the Corporation itself joined the causes of action in the same suit, in accordance with art. 66 of the present Code of Procedure, instead of bringing them separately and then asking the Court to consolidate them.
-
1,909.
Judson v. Governors of University of Toronto - [1972] SCR 553 - 1971-12-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsExpropriation
Pierre Genest, Q.C., and William G. Scott, for the respondent. JUDSON J. (dissenting in part)—I agree with and would adopt the majority reasons delivered in the Court of Appeal on both the issues involved in this appeal—the disallowance of additional compensation and the disallowance of interest.
-
1,910.
Minister of National Revenue v. Consolidated Holding Co. - [1974] SCR 419 - 1971-12-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
Solicitors for the respondent: Meredith, Marshall, McConnell & Scott, Vancouver.
-
1,911.
Culina v. Giuliani - [1972] SCR 343 - 1971-10-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsTrust
Scott on Trusts, 3rd ed., vol. IV, at p. 2517, says: Where the release is given by the trustee in breach of trust and the obligor is not in the position of a bona fide purchaser, either because he gives no value for the release or because he has notice that the trustee is committing a breach of trust in giving him the
-
1,912.
The Queen v. Smith - [1972] SCR 359 - 1971-10-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
In my opinion there is here no delegation of lawmaking power, but rather the adoption by Parliament, in the exercise of its exclusive power, of the legislation of another body as it may from time to time exist, a course which has been held constitutionally valid by this Court in Attorney General for Ontario v. Scott, (1956)
-
1,913.
Phillips et al. v. Samilo et al. - [1972] SCR 201 - 1971-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
Solicitors for the defendants, appellants, Victoria Phillips and Kenneth Meredith: Meredith, Marshall, McConnell & Scott, Vancouver.
-
1,914.
SCR | RCS [1971] - 1971-06-28
Canada Supreme Court ReportsLe Juge Judson 833 D. M. Gordon, Q.C., and J. C. Scott-Harston, D. M. Gordon, c.r., et J. C. Scott-Harston, Q.C., for the plaintiff, appellant. c.r., pour la demanderesse, appelante. [...] A. S. Dewar, Q.C., and R. J. Scott, for the A. S. Dewar, c.r., et R. J. Scott, pour la dé-defendant, respondent. fenderesse, intimée.
-
1,915.
Hellenius v. Lees - [1972] SCR 165 - 1971-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsMotor vehicles
The rule is conveniently and authoritatively stated in the judgment of Erle C.J., in Scott v. London & St. Katherine Docks Co.[2], where it is said:
-
1,916.
R. v. Bagshaw - [1972] SCR 2 - 1971-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Criminal law
I must point out that even if the theft from such other unidentified firm had been perpetrated by this appellant he could not have been convicted on the offence as charged as the cans would not have been the property of Canada Packers Limited: Reg. v. Scott[14].
-
1,917.
Royal Trust Company v. Ford et al. - [1971] SCR 831 - 1971-04-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
D.M. Gordon, Q.C., and J. C. Scott-Harston, Q.C., for the plaintiff, appellant.
-
1,918.
Welbridge Holdings Ltd. v. Greater Winnipeg - [1971] SCR 957 - 1970-12-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
A. S. Dewar, Q.C., and R. J. Scott, for the defendant, respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered by
-
1,919.
SCR | RCS [1970] - 1970-11-23
Canada Supreme Court ReportsScott v. The Queen (Alta.), leave to appeal refused, 29.6.70, autorisation d'appeler refusée. [...] Redlac v xi R., Goodwin v v R., Rickard v 1022 R., Great West News Ltd. et al. y ix R., Ritchie v xi R., Haig v ix R., Sanders v 109 R., Heathfield v ix R., Scott v xi R., Hendricks v 237 R., Shepherd v xi R., Hewitt v vi R., Solowan v 440 R., Hewitt v ix R. v. Stenning 631 R., Humphries v. ix R., Szoboszloi v xi R., [...] vi Sanders v. The Queen 109 Sandwich West, Corporation of the Township, City of Detroit v 627 Savage, Fribourg Investment Inc. v ix Sawyer, St-Germain v vi Scott v. The Queen xi Senkiw et al. v. Muzyka et al vi Shepherd v. The Queen xi Sept-Iles, Cité des, Labrecque v ix Sigouin et vir. v. Lévis vi Sigurdson et al. v.
-
1,920.
Attorney-General for Ontario v. Policyholders of Wentworth Insurance et al. - [1969] SCR 779 - 1969-06-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
F.W. Callaghan, Q.C., and R. Scott, for the appellant. H.H. Siegal, Q.C., for Policyholders of Wentworth Ins. and others claiming for losses.
-
1,921.
SCR | RCS [1969] - 1969-06-30
Canada Supreme Court ReportsScott et al. v. McCready (B.C.), motion to quash granted with costs, March 3, 1969. [...] Solicitors for the appellant: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: The Attorney General for Alberta. [...] F. W. Callaghan, Q.C., and R. Scott, for Othe appellant. H. H. Siegal, Q.C., for Policyholders of Wentworth Ins. and others claiming for losses.
-
1,922.
Minister of National Revenue v. Sissons - [1969] SCR 507 - 1969-03-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
cumstances takes on the character of a business, it is no longer an investment although all the mortgages are held to maturity: Scott v. Minister of National Revenue[6], Minister of National Revenue v. MacInnes[7].
-
1,923.
Wood v. M.N.R. - [1969] SCR 330 - 1969-01-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
In Scott v. Minister of National Revenue[4], Judson J., after reviewing a line of cases in the Exchequer Court dealing with this problem, in some of which it was held that the taxpayer was engaged in investment, and in others in a scheme for profit-making, said at p. 225:
-
1,924.
Kolnberger v. The Queen - [1969] SCR 213 - 1968-12-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Ian G. Scott, for the appellant. Brian Crane, for the respondent. Cartwright C.J. and Spence J. concurred with the judgment delivered by [...] Solicitors for the appellant: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: The Attorney General for Alberta.
-
1,925.
SCR | RCS [1968] - 1968-10-21
Canada Supreme Court ReportsThe case of A. G. for Ontario v. Scott 14, has been cited in support of the validity of the legislation which is here in question, but in my view the question decided in that case was an entirely different one. [...] The question as to the true interpretation in this respect of s. 10 of the Gaming Act was considered and determined by this Court in Scott v. Jackson, [19111 N.Z.L.R. 1025. [...] As DEG x Q Cartwright J. said in the Batary case (at p. 478) : v• THE QUEEN the maxim nemo tenetur seipsum accusare ... has been described (by Hall J. Coleridge J. in R. v. Scott, 1856, Dears & B. 47 at 61, 169 E.R. 909) as "a maxim of our law as settled, as important and as wise as almost any other in it".