Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
1,094 result(s)
-
426.
R. v. Perciballi - 2002 SCC 51 - [2002] 2 SCR 761 - 2002-06-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Scott C. Hutchison, for the appellant. Philip Campbell, for the respondent.
-
427.
R. v. Mullins-Johnson - [1998] 1 SCR 977 - 1998-05-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Scott C. Hutchison and Philip Downes, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
-
428.
R. v. Senior - [1997] 2 SCR 288 - 1997-05-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Solicitors for the appellant: Singleton Urquhart Scott, Calgary. Solicitor for the respondent: The Department of Justice, Calgary.
-
429.
Clark et al. v. Royal Bank of Canada - [1980] 1 SCR 177 - 1979-11-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsProfessional law
Solicitors for the respondent: Hanson, Hashey & Scott, Fredericton.
-
430.
Howson v. Lewis - [1929] SCR 174 - 1928-10-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
Henry Rees and Cuthbert Scott for the appellant. J. M. Stevenson K.C. for the respondent.
-
431.
Wilby v. Minister of Manpower and Immigration et al. - [1978] 1 SCR 490 - 1977-10-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Solicitors for the appellant: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: G.W. Ainslie, Ottawa.
-
432.
Town of Oakville v. Cranston - (1917) 55 SCR 630 - 1917-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
H.J. Scott K.C. and W.A. Chisholm for the appellant. James Lawson for the respondent.
-
433.
R. v. Dikah - [1994] 3 SCR 1020 - 1994-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Michael R. Dambrot, Q.C., and Scott K. Fenton, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
-
434.
R. v. Gould - [1987] 1 SCR 499 - 1987-05-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
James Scott Gould Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent indexed as: r. v. gould
-
435.
R. v. McColman - 2023 SCC 8 - 2023-03-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
R. 255; referred to: Kienapple v. The Queen, [1975] 1 S.C.R. 729; R. v. Hufsky, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 621; R. v. Ladouceur, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1257; R. v. Nolet, 2010 SCC 24, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 851; Scott v. R., 2021 QCCS 3866; Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, [2019] 4 S.C.R. 653; Rizzo & [...] R. 255; Scott v. R., 2021 QCCS 3866. However, Ontario’s HTA differs in important ways from the other provincial statutes that regulate driving and drivers.
-
436.
R. v. Villaroman - 2016 SCC 33 - [2016] 1 SCR 1000 - 2016-07-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Scott, Eric. “Hodge’s Case: A Reconsideration” (1965-66), 8 C.L.Q. 17. [...] While some have argued that there is a significant difference, I do not find that position convincing: see, e.g., E. Scott, “Hodge’s Case: A Reconsideration” (1965-66), 8 C.L.Q. 17, at p. 25; A. M. Gans, “Hodge’s Case Revisited” (1972-73), 15 C.L.Q. 127, at p. 132.
-
437.
Alberta Union of Provincial Employees v. Lethbridge Community College - 2004 SCC 28 - [2004] 1 SCR 727 - 2004-04-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Labour law
Alberta Union of Provincial Employees (Van Steenoven Grievance), [1998] A.G.A.A. No. 43 (QL); Port Arthur Shipbuilding Co. v. Arthurs, [1969] S.C.R. 85; Wm. Scott & Co. and Canadian Food and Allied Workers Union, Local P-162, [1977] 1 Can. L.R.B.R. 1; Alberta v. Alberta Union of Provincial Employees (1998), 230 A.R. [...] This unduly restrictive approach essentially prevented arbitrators from grappling with the real substance and respective merits of discharge grievances, and substantially impaired the ability of arbitrators to effect satisfactory resolutions of such disputes; see Wm. Scott & Co. and Canadian Food and Allied Workers
-
438.
Public School Boards' Assn. of Alberta v. Alberta (Attorney General) - 2000 SCC 45 - [2000] 2 SCR 409 - 2000-10-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
C. 1863, 26 Vict., c. 5 (“Scott Act”). See Iacobucci J., at para. 73: [...] While the notion of proportionality contained in s. 20 of the Scott Act is a constitutional right embodied in s. 93(1), the substantive purpose of this notion must be borne in mind: the achievement of an educational system that distributes provincial funds in a fair and non-discriminatory manner to common and separate
-
439.
Nicholson v. Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Police Commissioners - [1979] 1 SCR 311 - 1978-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Ian Scott, Q.C., for the appellant. P.D. Amey, for the respondent. [...] Solicitors for the appellant: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto. Solicitors for the respondent: Waterous, Holden, Kellock & Kent, Brantford.
-
440.
Eaton v. Moore - [1951] SCR 470 - 1951-02-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
W. B. Scott K.C. and P. M. Laing for the appellant. F. P. Brais K.C. and A. J. Campbell K.C. for the respondent. [...] Solicitors for the appellant: Scott, Hugessen, Macklaier, Chisholm, Smith & Davis.
-
441.
Reid v. Linnell - [1923] SCR 594 - 1923-06-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
In Scott v. The Fernie Lumber Co.[10], a decision pronounced in 1904, it was held by the full court that this enactment, which was then s. 66 of the Supreme Court Act, of 1904, had not wholly repealed the rule that a litigant is bound by the way in which he conducts his case at the trial, and that nothing in the section [...] Since that decision, s. 66 has been reenacted at least once without alteration, and as far as I am aware the principle laid down in Scott v. The Fernie Lumber Co.[11] has been acted upon by the British Columbia courts down to the present time.
-
442.
Polushie v. Zacklynski - (1906) 37 SCR 177 - 1906-02-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
If I had been in his place (Scott J.) my findings would have been of a similar character. [...] The study I have given to the evidence convinces me that the trial judge, Scott, J., was right in his conclusion that these Galician peasants
-
443.
R. v. Mankwe - 2001 SCC 63 - [2001] 3 SCR 3 - 2001-10-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Marie Chen and Sheena Scott, for the interveners. English version of the judgment of the Court delivered orally by
-
444.
R. v. Poirier - [1998] 1 SCR 24 - 1998-01-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
R. Scott Peacock, for the respondent. //Cory J.// The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
-
445.
R. v. Bedford - [1997] 2 SCR 292 - 1997-05-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
Scott C. Hutchison, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
-
446.
R. v. Côté - [1993] 3 SCR 639 - 1993-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Scott F. Fowler, for the appellant. John A. Henheffer, for the respondent.
-
447.
R. v. Murdock - [1992] 2 SCR 164 - 1992-06-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Scott C. Hutchison and David G. Algie, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
-
448.
R. v. Dubois - [1980] 2 SCR 21 - 1980-06-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Lorne Scott, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
-
449.
R. v. MacLeod - 2014 SCC 76 - [2014] 3 SCR 619 - 2014-12-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsMark A. Scott and Marian Fortune-Stone, Q.C., for the appellant. Roger A. Burrill, for the respondent.
-
450.
Paul D'Aoust Construction Ltd. v. Markel Insurance Co. of Canada - 2001 SCC 84 - [2001] 3 SCR 744 - 2001-12-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
K. Scott McLean, for the appellants. Ronald W. Price, for the respondent Markel Insurance Company of Canada.