Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
1,094 result(s)
-
576.
Reference re Secession of Quebec - [1998] 2 SCR 217 - 1998-08-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Courts
International law
Stephen A. Scott, for the interveners Roopnarine Singh, Keith Owen Henderson, Claude Leclerc, Kenneth O’Donnell and Van Hoven Petteway. [...] Solicitors for the intervener the Minority Advocacy and Rights Council: Scott & Aylen, Toronto. [...] Solicitors for the interveners Roopnarine Singh, Keith Owen Henderson, Claude Leclerc, Kenneth O’Donnell and Van Hoven Petteway: Stephen A. Scott, Montréal.
-
577.
R. v. Bisson - [1998] 1 SCR 306 - 1998-02-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
In this aspect, I agree with the comments of Scott C.J.M. set out in the judgment below (at pp. 234‑35):
-
578.
R. v. Jones - [1991] 3 SCR 110 - 1991-09-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
Scott C. Hutchison, for the respondent. I. G. Whitehall, Q.C., and Kimberly Prost, for the intervener the Attorney General of Canada.
-
579.
The Queen v. Smith - [1972] SCR 359 - 1971-10-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
In my opinion there is here no delegation of lawmaking power, but rather the adoption by Parliament, in the exercise of its exclusive power, of the legislation of another body as it may from time to time exist, a course which has been held constitutionally valid by this Court in Attorney General for Ontario v. Scott, (1956)
-
580.
Roe v. The King - [1949] SCR 652 - 1949-04-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Mr. Walter M. Scott, a professional engineer, testified that a 45 gallon capacity barrel, containing 300 pounds of water would be two-thirds full, and that if he were asked to make an estimate of the time such a barrel would take to float down the Red River from the point already mentioned to Norwood Bridge, he would take
-
581.
Sayers v. The King - [1941] SCR 362 - 1941-05-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
W. L. Scott K.C. for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered by
-
582.
New Brunswick & Canada Railboard Co. v. New Brunswick Ry. Co. - [1924] SCR 450 - 1924-06-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsLease
Nova Scotia Steel and Coal Co. v. Minister of Finance of Newfoundland[7]; North British Ry. Co. v. Scott[8].
-
583.
Major v. Canadian Pacific Railway - (1922) 64 SCR 367 - 1922-06-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
The plaintiff is, therefore, in establishing his cause of action, obliged to invoke an illegal act in which he participated and consequently cannot maintain his action; Simpson v. Bloss[5]; Taylor v. Chester[6]; Scott v. Brown.
-
584.
Frith v. Alliance Investment Co. - (1914) 49 SCR 384 - 1914-01-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
he accepted, as did Mr. Justice Scott and Mr. Justice Simmons, "the findings of fact adverse to the plaintiff."
-
585.
Canadian Railway Accident Insurance Co. v. Haines - (1911) 44 SCR 386 - 1911-04-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
Greenwood v. Sutcliffe[3]; Scott v. Uxbridge and Rickmansworth Railway Co.[4].
-
586.
R. v. O'Connor - [1995] 4 SCR 411 - 1995-12-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Brian Weagant and Sheena Scott, for the intervener the Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law. [...] The general test for abuse of process adopted in that case has been repeatedly affirmed: R. v. Keyowski, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 657, at pp. 658-59, R. v. Mack, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 903, at p. 941, R. v. Conway, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1659, at p. 1667, R. v. Scott, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 979, at pp. 992-93, and most recently in R. v. Power, [1994] 1 [...] In Scott, supra, in the context of an immediate stay by the Crown upon the posing by defence counsel of a question which would have revealed the identity of a police informer, the majority again considered abuse of process separately from an examination of whether the accused's s. 11 (b) rights had been violated by the
-
587.
MacDonald v. Canada - 2020 SCC 6 - [2020] 1 SCR 319 - 2020-03-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
Li, Jinyan, Joanne Magee, and J. Scott Wilkie. Principles of Canadian Income Tax Law, 9th ed. [...] The taxpayer’s conduct is generally more revealing than “ex post facto declarations” of the taxpayer (Vern Krishna, Income Tax Law (2nd ed. 2012), at p. 161; see also Jinyan Li, Joanne Magee and J. Scott Wilkie, Principles of Canadian Income Tax Law (9th ed. 2017), at p. 296).
-
588.
Pecore v. Pecore - 2007 SCC 17 - [2007] 1 SCR 795 - 2007-05-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
[2006] B.C.J. No. 3081 (QL), 2006 BCSC 1761; Shaw v. MacKenzie Estate (1994), 4 E.T.R. (2d) 306; Reber v. Reber (1988), 48 D.L.R. (4th) 376; Russell v. Scott (1936), 55 C.L.R. 440; Young v. Sealey, [1949] 1 All E.R. 92; Aroso v. Coutts, [2002] 1 All E.R. (Comm) 241, [2001] EWHC Ch 443; Matter of Totten, 179 N.Y. 112 [...] 51 Treating survivorship in these circumstances as an inter vivos gift of a joint interest has found favour in other jurisdictions, including Australia and the United Kingdom: see Russell v. Scott (1936), 55 C.L.R. 440, at p. 455; Young v. Sealey, [1949] 1 All E.R. 92 (Ch. Div.), at pp. 107-8; (in obiter) Aroso v. Coutts,
-
589.
R. v. Jones - [1986] 2 SCR 284 - 1986-10-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Reinhold Endres and Alison Scott, for the intervener the Attorney General of Nova Scotia. [...] Solicitors for the intervener the Attorney General of Nova Scotia: Reinhold Endres and Alison Scott, Halifax.
-
590.
Rathwell v. Rathwell - [1978] 2 SCR 436 - 1978-01-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsFamily law
from contract and tort, in which the court subjects "a person holding title to property . . , to an equitable duty to convey it to another on the ground that he would be unjustly enriched if he were permitted to retain it"; Murdoch v. Murdoch at p. 455, per Laskin J., citing Scott, Law of Trusts (3d), Vol. 5, at p. 3215. [...] As expressed by Professor Scott in an article entitled "Constructive Trusts" (1955), 71 L.Q.Rev. 39 at p. 41:
-
591.
Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. The King - [1948] SCR 183 - 1948-04-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
W. B. Scott, K.C. and Jacques Courtois for the appellants. Antoine Rivard, K.C. and Guy Hudon, K.C. for the respondent. [...] Solicitors for the appellants: Scott, Hugessen, Macklaier, Chisholm & Hyde.
-
592.
Nicholls v. Cumming - (1877) 1 SCR 395 - 1877-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
Mr. James Bethune, Q.C, and Mr. W.H. Scott, Q.C, for Respondent: The proceeding in this case is one against a public officer who is not an agent of the municipality, but an independent officer, acting under the authority of sections 93 and 106 of c. 36, 32 Vict. [...] Attorneys for Respondent: Scott & Edwards. [1] See case as reported in 25 U.C.C.P., 169, and in 26 U.C.C.P., 323.
-
593.
Bank of Montreal v. Dynex Petroleum Ltd. - 2002 SCC 7 - [2002] 1 SCR 146 - 2002-01-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
James C. Crawford, Q.C., Frank R. Dearlove and Scott H. D. Bower, for the respondents.
-
594.
Fraser et al. v. The Queen - [1967] SCR 38 - 1966-10-31
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
RITCHIE J.:—This is an appeal from three judgments of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia1 rendered in accordance with a decision of the majority of that Court (Bull J.A. dissenting) which affirmed the convictions of the various appellants before Magistrate G.W. Scott on three separate informations each alleging that
-
595.
Nykorak v. Attorney General of Canada - [1962] SCR 331 - 1962-03-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
of this form of action which are to be found in Attorney-General for New South Wales v. Perpetual Trustee Co. (Ltd.)[4], and Commissioner for Railways (N.S.W.) v. Scott[5] As far as members of the armed forces are concerned it was decided in The King v. Richardson[6], that s. 50 does entitle the Crown to bring this action
-
596.
The Queen v. Bamsey - [1960] SCR 294 - 1960-01-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
RITCHIE J.:—The respondent herein, having pleaded guilty, was convicted by G. W. Scott, Esq., Deputy Police Magistrate in and for the City of Vancouver, on the charge that he unlawfully drove his motor vehicle on a highway
-
597.
Edwards v. Bradley - [1957] SCR 599 - 1957-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsTrust
Reference might also be made to Russell v. Scott[5], a decision of the High Court of Australia.
-
598.
The Queen v. Mackay - [1954] SCR 3 - 1953-12-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
C.F. Scott for the respondent. KERWIN J.: (dissenting in part):—After a joint trial with a jury, the respondent McKay, and Wood and Quinlan were convicted of having unlawfully assaulted a person with intent to rob.
-
599.
Middlebro v. Ryan - [1925] SCR 10 - 1924-12-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
H.J. Scott K.C. for the respondents. The judgment of the majority of the court (Anglin C.J.C. and Duff, Mignault, Newcombe and Rinfret JJ.) was written by
-
600.
Kerrigan v. Harrison - (1921) 62 SCR 374 - 1921-10-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
H.J. Scott K.C. and McEvoy for the respondent, cited Haywood v. Brunswick Permanent Building Soc.[7]; Andrew v. Aitken[8]; Austerberry v. Oldham[9].