Advanced Search
- All Databases (1,254)
- Decisions (530)
- Resources (724)
530 result(s)
-
151.
McGreevy v. The Queen - (1891) 19 SCR 180 - 1891-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Dans la cause de Allen v. Allen,([8]) la cour de Bordeaux a décidé, le 28 novembre 1835 que les amiables compositeurs n'étaient pas obliges de motiver leur sentence.
-
152.
Syl Apps Secure Treatment Centre v. B.D. - 2007 SCC 38 - [2007] 3 SCR 83 - 2007-07-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Linden, Allen M., and Bruce Feldthusen. Canadian Tort Law, 8th ed. Markham: Butterworths, 2006. [...] The purpose of this aspect of the analysis was explained by Allen Linden and Bruce Feldthusen in Canadian Tort Law (8th ed. 2006) as being to decide “whether, despite the reasonable foresight of harm, it is unjust or unfair to hold the defendant subject to a duty because of the absence of any relationship of proximity
-
153.
The King v. Hearn - (1917) 55 SCR 562 - 1917-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsExpropriation
I refer to that called "The Molson Macpherson sale," that known as "The Allen sale," and that belonging to the Belanger estate. [...] The first and lastly named seem directly in point though some objections are taken as to the Allen sale, which renders it of less value, yet of very great value, if correctly understood.
-
154.
Lynch v. The Canada North-West. Land Co. / South Dufferin v. Morden / Gibbins v. Barber - (1891) 19 SCR 204 - 1891-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Augusta v. North ([8]); Camden v. Allen ([9]); Perry v. Washburn ([10]). [...] The next case was that of the City of Camden v. Allen ([19]). That was an action of debt brought to recover a tax by the municipality to which “it was due.
-
155.
Almon v. Lewin - (1881) 5 SCR 514 - 1881-03-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Allen Almon had received, in the life-time of the testator, the sum of nine thousand five hundred dollars, which sum is charged against her in the testator's books. [...] rents, issues, dividends and profits of the lands, tenements, hereditaments and premises mentioned in the several schedules, and to pay to his daughter Mary Allen Almon the rents, issues, dividends and profits of the lands, tenements and hereditaments apportioned to her and mentioned in the schedule A; to his daughter
-
156.
Gauthier v. Beaumont - [1998] 2 SCR 3 - 1998-07-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
Torts
David Allen Gauthier Appellant v. Municipal Corporation of the Town of Brome Lake Respondent [...] It is therefore not open to this Court to review his findings of fact as to the extent of the disability of the appellant David Allen Gauthier between 1982 and 1988. [...] 19 In his expert report, the psychiatrist Dr. Vacaflor discussed David Allen Gauthier’s state of fear over a six‑year period but did not specify in any way when or how the symptoms of the subacute phase abated (Case on Appeal, at pp. 53 and 55).
-
157.
R. v. Thompson - [1990] 2 SCR 1111 - 1990-10-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
Ross Allen Rosen, Beebe Auld, Glen Douglas McDonald and James Cromwell Appellants [...] Ross Allen ROSEN 3968 A Columbia Valley Highway Cultus Lake, B.C. (tel. no. 858-6254) [...] or elsewhere in the Province of British Columbia resorted to by the said Perry Gordon THOMPSON, Beebe AULD, Ross Allen ROSEN, Miron Renoldo KRULL and Lori Christine MARSHALL.
-
158.
Drew Brown Ltd. v. The ‘Orient Trader’ - [1974] SCR 1286 - 1972-12-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
International law
[Canadian General Electric Co. Ltd. v. Pickford and Black Ltd., [1972] S.C.R. 52 applied; Livesley v. Horst, [1924] S.C.R. 605; Allen v. Hay (1922), 64 S.C.R. 76, Federal Commerce and Navigation Co. Ltd. v. Eisenerz-G.m.b.H. [1974] S.C.R. 1225, referred to] [...] Duff J., as he then was, adopted a similar view in Allen v. Hay[1], at pp. 80-81: [...] At the most, I may look to his sources to see if his reliance on them is borne out: see Allen v. Hay[17], at p. 81.
-
159.
Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Paul - [1988] 2 SCR 654 - 1988-12-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
Chief Winston Paul, Darrell Paul, Peter Paul, Wayne Paul, Allen Paul, James Sappier, Jack Polchies, Carol Polchies, Fred Sappier, Leonard Tomah, and All Members of the Woodstock Indian Reserve Band and The Council Thereof Respondents [...] Solicitors for the respondents Paul et al.: Mockler, Allen & Dixon, Fredericton.
-
160.
Manuge v. Dominion Atlantic Railway Co. - [1973] SCR 232 - 1972-10-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsMotor vehicles
Transportation
[Allen v. Gen. Mgr. C.N. Railways (1924), 57 N.S.R. 252; Reynolds v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co. (1926), 59 O.L.R. 396, applied; Commissioner for Railways v. McDermott, [1967] 1 A.C. 169, distinguished; Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v. Babudro and Sdraulig, [1969] S.C.R. 698; Lake Erie and Detroit River Ry. Co. v. Barclay [...] tion, Mr. Justice Cooper cites the judgment of Mr. Justice Rogers, speaking for the majority of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, en banc, in Allen v. General Manager C.N. Railways[3], where he says at pp. 255 and 256:
-
161.
Lister v. McAnulty - [1944] SCR 317 - 1944-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsInternational law
As it has been said by Sir Lyman Duff, in Allen v. Hay[3], 64 S.C.R. at page 81: [...] This was expressly stated in the case of Allen v. Hay[8]. For the present law, he largely relied upon a decision of the Supreme Court of that State reported as Feneff v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Co.[9], which was decided in 1909.
-
162.
Chapdelaine v. The King - [1935] SCR 53 - 1934-11-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Allen v. The King[13]. Where the jury has been misdirected on a material matter, the onus is upon the Crown to shew that the jury, charged as they should have been, could not, as reasonable men, have given on the evidence a verdict other than one of guilt. [...] Having reached that conclusion, even after the reading of the whole evidence, in view of the decisions of Allen v. The King[15], and Gouin v. The King[16], I cannot but conclude that the appeal must be allowed, the conviction quashed and a new trial directed.
-
163.
Glesby v. Mitchell - [1932] SCR 260 - 1931-12-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
And we think that, under the circumstances stated in this bill of exceptions, there was evidence for the jury of an engagement on the part of Allen not to negotiate the bill mentioned in the second count after it became due; therefore, without going further into the case, it is enough to say that there must be a venire de [...] In Allen v. Royal Bank of Canada[8], Lord Atkinson, in giving the judgment of the Privy Council, said:—
-
164.
Roncarelli v. Duplessis - [1959] SCR 121 - 1959-01-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsState
In Allen v. Flood, the actor was a labour leader and the victims non-union workmen who were lawfully dismissed by their employer to avoid a strike involving no breach of contract or law. [...] In Allen v. Flood there were no such elements. Nor is it necessary to examine the question whether on the basis of an improper revocation the appellant could have compelled the issue of a new permit or whether the purported revocation was a void act. [...] It is the application to such a privilege of the proposition urged but rejected in Allen v. Flood in the case of a private employment.
-
165.
R. v. Pelletier - [1996] 3 SCR 601 - 1996-10-31
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Allen Pelletier Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Pelletier
-
166.
R. v. Oland - 2017 SCC 17 - [2017] 1 SCR 250 - 2017-03-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
& P.E.I.R. 69; R. v. Hall, 2002 SCC 64, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 309; R. v. Rhyason, 2006 ABCA 120, 208 C.C.C. (3d) 193; R. v. Roussin, 2011 MBCA 103, 275 Man. R. (2d) 46; R. v. Allen, 2001 NFCA 44, 158 C.C.C. (3d) 225; R. v. Delisle, 2012 QCCA 1250; R. v. Meda (1981), 23 C.R. (3d) 174; R. v. Olsen (1996), 94 O.A.C. 62; R. v. [...] I say this mindful of the fact that some authorities have expressed concerns about assessing the merits of an appeal beyond the s. 679(3)(a) “not frivolous” criterion: see R. v. Allen, 2001 NFCA 44, 158 C.C.C. (3d) 225, at paras. 31-52; Parsons, at paras. 55-59.
-
167.
Slattery (Trustee of) v. Slattery - [1993] 3 SCR 430 - 1993-09-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
Edited by R. E. Allen. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984, "relation". Toope, Stephen J., and Alison L. Young. [...] Solicitors for the appellant: Mockler, Allen & Dixon, Fredericton. Solicitors for the respondent: Palmer, O'Connell, Leger, Roderick & Glennie, Saint John.
-
168.
Sershall v. Toronto Transportation Commission - [1939] SCR 287 - 1939-06-27
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
3. Was the deceased Allen Sershall guilty of any negligence that caused or contributed to the collision? [...] 3. Was the deceased Allen Sershall guilty of any negligence that caused or contributed to the collision?
-
169.
Grand Trunk Railway Co. of Canada v. Hainer - (1905) 36 SCR 180 - 1905-05-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
In Allen v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co.[46], the court was composed of Lord Esher M.R. and Lindley and Bowen L.JJ. It was a case where the accident happened upon a bridge upon which two tramway lines coalesced and the plaintiff when endeavouring to cross the road looked only in one direction and not in the direction [...] [53] 10 Allen (Mass.) 532. [54] 84 Pa. St. 226. [55] 97 Mich. 240, at page 244.
-
170.
Halifax Electric Tramway Co. v. Inglis - (1900) 30 SCR 256 - 1900-04-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Then there is the case of Allen v. The North Metropolitan Tramways Co.[29]. [...] Then there is Follet v. The Toronto Street Railway Co.[32] which proceeded upon the express authority of Allen v. North Metropolitan Tramway Co.[33].
-
171.
Harrington v. Corse - (1883) 9 SCR 412 - 1883-04-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
In Allen v. Allen ([7]) where a testatrix had an estate which she had herself mortgaged, and another estate which had been mortgaged by a former owner, and she devsed the former for sale and payment of certain legacies, and the residue of her real and personal estate, including that which had been mortgaged by a former
-
172.
Canam Enterprises Inc. v. Coles - 2002 SCC 63 - [2002] 3 SCR 307 - 2002-10-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
Jeffrey S. Klein and Allen Wassermuhl, for the respondents (third parties).
-
173.
St. Lawrence Cement Inc. v. Barrette - 2008 SCC 64 - [2008] 3 SCR 392 - 2008-11-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
inc. v. Société nationale des québécois et des québécoises de la Capitale inc., [1993] R.R.A. 41; Ouimette v. Canada (Procureur général), [2002] R.J.Q. 1228; Allen v. Gulf Oil Refining Ltd., [1981] 1 All E.R. 353; Manchester Corporation v. Farnworth, [1930] A.C. 171; Hammersmith and City Railway Co. v. Brand (1869), L.R. [...] Linden, Allen M., and Bruce Feldthusen. Canadian Tort Law, 8th ed. Markham, Ont.: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2006. [...] According to SLC, although this rule derives from English law (Allen v. Gulf Oil Refining Ltd., [1981] 1 All E.R. 353 (H.L.); Manchester Corporation v. Farnworth, [1930] A.C. 171 (H.L.); Hammersmith and City Railway Co. v. Brand (1869), L.R. 4 H.L. 171), it is recognized in Canadian common law (Ryan v. Victoria (City),
-
174.
Queen v. Cognos Inc. - [1993] 1 SCR 87 - 1993-01-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
and Assessment Act, 1979 v. San Sebastian Pty. Ltd., [1983] 2 N.S.W.L.R. 268 (C.A.), aff'd on other grounds (1986), 68 A.L.R. 161 (H.C.); Banque Financière de la Cité SA v. Westgate Insurance Co., [1989] 2 All E.R. 952, aff'd on other grounds [1990] 2 All E.R. 947 (H.L.); Doherty v. Allen (1988), 55 D.L.R. (4th) 746. [...] Linden, Allen M. Canadian Tort Law, 4th ed. Toronto: Butterworths, 1988. [...] de la Cité SA v. Westgate Insurance Co., [1989] 2 All E.R. 952 (C.A.), at p. 1000, aff'd on other grounds [1990] 2 All E.R. 947 (H.L.); Datile Financial Corp. v. Royal Trust, supra, at p. 379; Hendrick v. De Marsh (Ont. H.C.), supra; Steer v. Aerovox, supra; and Doherty v. Allen (1988), 55 D.L.R. (4th) 746 (N.B.C.A.).
-
175.
Hechter et al. v. Thurston - [1980] 2 SCR 254 - 1980-10-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
Solicitors for the defendant, respondent: Allen & Booth, Winnipeg. [1] [1979] 3 W.W.R. 172.