Advanced Search
- All Databases (1,254)
- Decisions (530)
- Resources (724)
530 result(s)
-
451.
Clarkson v. Dominion Bank - (1919) 58 SCR 448 - 1919-03-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsFinancial institutions
Chetwynd v. Allen[21], at page 358, per Romer J. [Page 470] Substitution, like merger, is largely a question of intention.
-
452.
Kelly v. The King - (1916) 54 SCR 220 - 1916-11-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
The view that, by holding that there was ample evidence of some offence and, consequently, no substantial wrong or miscarriage occurred cannot prevail; the court cannot be the judge of what may have influenced the minds of the jury where evidence of an important character was improperly admitted: Allen v. The King[20]; Bray
-
453.
Eberts v. The King - (1912) 47 SCR 1 - 1912-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
It is impossible to say what effect such a direction may have had in bringing the jury to their conclusion: Rex v. Everest[19].; Allen v. The King[20].
-
454.
Stevenson v. Canadian Bank of Commerce - (1893) 23 SCR 530 - 1893-02-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
The case of Allen v. The Quebec Warehouse Company ([9]) was appealed to by the learned counsel for the plaintiff, and the rule there recognized that the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council will not interfere with the judsrment of two course concurring upon a question of fact unless the finding be clearly erroneous, but
-
455.
McLaren v. Caldwell - (1882) 8 SCR 435 - 1882-11-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsMaritime law
[32] 1 Allen N.B. 329. [33] 1 Kerr N.B. 501. [34] 12 Vic. ch. 87.
-
456.
C.M. Callow Inc. v. Zollinger - 2020 SCC 45 - [2020] 3 SCR 908 - 2020-12-18
Supreme Court Judgments46, [2018] 3 S.C.R. 101; Houle v. Canadian National Bank, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 122; Mayor of Bradford v. Pickles, [1895] A.C. 587; Allen v. Flood, [1898] A.C. 1; United Roasters, Inc. v. Colgate‐Palmolive Co., 649 F.2d 985 (4th Cir. 1981); IFP Technologies (Canada) Inc. v. EnCana Midstream and Marketing, 2017 ABCA 157, 53 Alta. [...] [1] Professor Gutteridge pointed in particular to the influence of Mayor of Bradford v. Pickles, [1895] A.C. 587 (H.L.) and, in the contractual setting, Allen v. Flood, [1898] A.C. 1 (H.L.), quoting from p. 46 of the latter judgment: “. . . any right given by contract may be exercised as against the giver by the person to
-
457.
A.C. v. Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services) - 2009 SCC 30 - [2009] 2 SCR 181 - 2009-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil law
Constitutional law
Buchanan, Allen E., and Dan W. Brock. Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. [...] ”, in Michael Freeman, ed., Children, Medicine and the Law (2005), 487, at pp. 488-89; Allen E. Buchanan and Dan W. Brock, Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making (1990), at p. 221: “[C]hildren may give inadequate weight to the effects of decisions on their future interests, and also fail to anticipate
-
458.
Dagenais v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp. - [1994] 3 SCR 835 - 1994-12-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Constitutional law
Courts
Criminal law
Linden, Allen M. "Limitations on Media Coverage of Legal Proceedings: A Critique and Some Proposals for Reform". [...] In Philip Anisman and Allen M. Linden, eds., The Media, the Courts and the Charter.
-
459.
Martel Building Ltd. v. Canada - 2000 SCC 60 - [2000] 2 SCR 860 - 2000-11-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Torts
Linden, Allen M. Canadian Tort Law, 6th ed. Toronto: Butterworths, 1997.
-
460.
Sauvageau v. The King - [1950] SCR 664 - 1950-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsState
...Now, before discussing the case of Allen v. Flood (1898 A.C. 1) and what was decided therein, there are two observations of a general character which I wish to make, and one is to repeat what I have very often said before, that every judgment must be read as applicable to the particular facts proved, or assumed to be
-
461.
Gray v. Richford - (1878) 2 SCR 431 - 1878-06-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Stephens v. Allen[12]; Jones v. Duff[13]; Armstrong v. Bowes[14]; Donnelly v. Rawden[15]; Doe v. Needs[16].
-
462.
Nicholls v. Cumming - (1877) 1 SCR 395 - 1877-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
As to the general construction of such statutes: Partington v. Attorney General[26]; Brown’s Leg. Max.[27] Sedgwick on Statutes and Constitutional Law[28]; Maxwell on Statutes[29]; Newton v. Cowie[30]; Brooks v. Cock[31]; Cooley, Constitutional Limitations[32]; People v. Allen[33]; Dwarris on Statutes[34]; Newell v.
-
463.
Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2011 SCC 2 - [2011] 1 SCR 19 - 2011-01-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Greenspan, Edward L. “Comment: Another Argument Against Television in the Courtroom”, in Philip Anisman and Allen M. Linden, eds., The Media, the Courts and the Charter.
-
464.
Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd. - 2002 SCC 77 - [2002] 4 SCR 153 - 2002-12-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
Interpharm Inc. and Allen Barry Shechtman Respondents Indexed as: Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd.
-
465.
Asamera Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Sea Oil & General Corporation et al. - [1979] 1 SCR 633 - 1978-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
The rule of highest intermediate value up to the time of trial formerly prevailed in that State, and may be found laid down in Romaine v. Van Allen, 26 N.Y. 309, and Markham v. Jaudon, 41 N.Y. 235, and other cases,—although the rigid application of the rule was deprecated by the New York Superior Court in an able opinion by
-
466.
Thomson Newspapers Ltd. v. Canada (Director of Investigation and Research, Restrictive Trade Practices Commission) - [1990] 1 SCR 425 - 1990-03-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsCompetition law
Constitutional law
Evidence
Irvine v. Canada (Restrictive Trade Practices Commission), [1987] 1 S.C.R. 181; Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc., 555 F.2d 862 (1977); People v. Allen, 103 N.E.2d 92 (1952); Federal Trade Commission v. Tuttle, 244 F.2d 605 (1957); Adams v. Federal Trade Commission, 296 F.2d 861 (1961); People v. Dorr, 265 [...] There are many other cases in which the "relevancy to a lawful inquiry" test has been applied to subpoenas issued by agencies or officials investigating anti‑trust violations; see People v. Allen, 103 N.E.2d 92 (Ill. 1952); Federal Trade Commission v. Tuttle, 244 F.2d 605 (2d Cir. 1957); Adams v. Federal Trade Commission, [...] Thus in the circumstances here present, what we observed in People v. Allen, 410 Ill. 508, 517, 103 N.E.2d 92, 96, is particularly pertinent: "In litigated cases, materiality can be fixed with a relatively high degree of precision by reference to the issues formulated in the pleadings.
-
467.
York Region District School Board v. Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario - 2024 SCC 22 - 2024-06-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Constitutional law
Susan Ursel and Kristen Allen, for the intervener the David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights.
-
468.
Owners, Strata Plan LMS 3905 v. Crystal Square Parking Corp. - 2020 SCC 29 - [2020] 3 SCR 247 - 2020-10-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsSolicitors for the intervener C.H.O.A. Condominium Home Owners’ Association of B.C.: Allen/McMillan Litigation Counsel, Vancouver.
-
469.
R. v. N.S. - 2012 SCC 72 - [2012] 3 SCR 726 - 2012-12-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Bingham, Tom. The Rule of Law. London: Allen Lane, 2010. Canadian Judicial Council.
-
470.
Canada (House of Commons) v. Vaid - 2005 SCC 30 - [2005] 1 SCR 667 - 2005-05-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Constitutional law
Solicitors for the respondent Satnam Vaid: Raven, Allen, Cameron, Ballantyne & Yazbeck, Ottawa.
-
471.
Prud'homme v. Prud'homme - 2002 SCC 85 - [2002] 4 SCR 663 - 2002-12-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
Linden, Allen M. Canadian Tort Law, 6th ed. Toronto: Butterworths, 1997.
-
472.
R. v. Lee - [1989] 2 SCR 1384 - 1989-12-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Allen Harry Lee Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent and
-
473.
Schultz v. Wood - (1881) 6 SCR 585 - 1881-11-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
[30] 8 Allen (Mass.), 334. [31] 34 Beav. 623. [32] 9 Ves. Jr. 283.
-
474.
Dagg v. Canada (Minister of Finance) - [1997] 2 SCR 403 - 1997-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsAccess to information
Solicitors for the intervener the Public Service Alliance of Canada: Raven, Jewitt & Allen, Ottawa.
-
475.
The King v. Chappelle / The King v. Carmack / The King v. Tweed - (1902) 32 SCR 586 - 1902-11-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsMines and minerals
See Bain v. City of Montreal[3]; Ex parte Lewin[4]; Benjamin v. County of Elgin[5]; Langley v. Van Allen[6].