Advanced Search
- All Databases (1,254)
- Decisions (530)
- Resources (724)
530 result(s)
-
26.
Allen Oberg et al. v. Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food in his Capacity as Minister Responsible for the Canadian Wheat Board - 2013-01-17
Applications for LeaveAllen Oberg et al. v. Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food in his Capacity as Minister Responsible for the Canadian Wheat Board, Allen Oberg et al. v. Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food in his Capacity as Minister Responsible for the Canadian Wheat Board, 34971 [...] Allen Oberg, Rod Flaman, Cam Goff, Kyle Korneychuk, John Sandborn, Bill Toews, Stewart Wells and Bill Woods [...] Allen Oberg, Rod Flaman, Cam Goff, Kyle Korneychuk, John Sandborn, Bill Toews, Stewart Wells et Bill Woods
-
27.
Elleanor Hill, Brian Douglas Hill, Jonathan Allan Hill, Matthew Cleveland Hill, and Brianna Elizabeth Hill, Minors by their Litigation Guardian, Elleanor Ann Hill v. H.H. Allen - 2009-10-15
Applications for LeaveAllan Hill, Matthew Cleveland Hill, and Brianna Elizabeth Hill, Minors by their Litigation Guardian, Elleanor Ann Hill v. H.H. Allen, Elleanor Hill, Brian Douglas Hill, Jonathan Allan Hill, Matthew Cleveland Hill, and Brianna Elizabeth Hill, Minors by their Litigation Guardian, Elleanor Ann Hill v. H.H. Allen, 33099 [...] H.H. Allen Respondent ENTRE : Elleanor Hill, Brian Douglas Hill, Jonathan Allan Hill, Matthew Cleveland Hill, and Brianna Elizabeth Hill, Minors by their Litigation Guardian, Elleanor Ann Hill [...] H.H. Allen Intimé JUDGMENT The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C47582, 2009 ONCA 70, dated January 27, 2009, is dismissed with costs.
-
28.
Hechler v. Forsyth - (1894) 22 SCR 489 - 1894-02-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
One James Allen carried on business in Halifax under the firm name of John Allen & Sons and being [...] Allen continued after the assignment to carry on the business as before and in doing so continued to purchase goods from the plaintiff, giving him in some instances promissory notes signed "John Allen & Sons, Hechler trustee, per James Allen." [...] Allen promised to pay in full and it was just carried on; the account was continued with the same heading, John Allen & Sons, after the trust deed."
-
29.
Highway Victims Indemnity Fund et al. v. Martineau - [1978] 1 SCR 247 - 1977-04-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsMotor vehicles
Jeannette Martineau and Allen Robindaine (Defendants) Appellants; and [...] On the evening of November 18, 1969, appellant Allen Robindaine, driving a car which was the property of his wife, appellant Jeannette Mar- [...] The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal of Allen Robindaine and Jeannette Martineau because it found no manifest error in the trial judgment.
-
30.
Debortoli v. The King - [1926] SCR 492 - 1926-06-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Held, that the judgment of the Court of Appeal did not conflict with the judgment in the Allen Case, and the application was dismissed. [...] In Allen v. The King[3] a witness had testified at the preliminary investigation who was not produced at the trial, and the requirements for the admission of his deposition under s. 999 of the Criminal Code were not established. [...] The question I think is whether that court should have held otherwise upon the proper interpretation and application of the decision in Allen v. The King[4].
-
31.
Hamilton (City) v. Hamilton Children's Aid Society - [1954] SCR 569 - 1954-10-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsFamily law
In Re Van Allen [1953] O.R. 569 approved. Decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal [1953] O.W.N. 699, affirmed. [...] There is only one possible ground of distinction between the facts in the case at bar and those in Re Van Allen. [...] As was held in Re Van Allen, it was not a new “case” that came before the judge on February 25, 1953.
-
32.
Perrault v. Gauthier - (1898) 28 SCR 241 - 1898-02-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
A recent decision by the House of Lords in a similar case Allen v. Flood (1) still more strikingly illustrates the glorious uncertainty of the law. [...] The facts in the two cases are very similar in many respects, although in some Allen v. Flood ([14]) is much stronger for the non-union men. [...] In Allen v. Flood (1), the non-union men were dismissed at once in consequence of the request of the unionists.
-
33.
Minister of National Revenue v. Holden - [1932] SCR 655 - 1932-06-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
“4. On the 1st day of January, 1917, there were then living, Iva McMartin, Widow of the said Duncan McMartin, deceased, and Allen A. McMartin, Melba McMartin and Duncan McMartin, children of the said deceased, all of whom resided in the City of New York and had so resided for some time prior to the 1st day of January, 1917. [...] “6. The said Allen McMartin continued to reside in the City of New York or elsewhere in the United States of America until January, 1926, at which date he took up his residence in the City of Montreal, Province of Quebec, and has since resided there. [...] The Executor cross-appealed from that part of the judgment which directed that the interest of Allen A. McMartin was to be assessed from the date on which he became a resident of Canada.
-
34.
The Union Bank of Halifax v. Spinney - (1906) 38 SCR 187 - 1906-12-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsFinancial institutions
About the 26th September, 1903, Churchill was told by Allen, the agent of the plaintiff bank, that he would have to reduce his account, and the last of September or first of October he applied to Allen for a further advance on corn and was informed by Allen that he was instructed not to advance him any more money. [...] Allen, relying on this promise paid the draft. At this time Churchill owed the bank a large sum and there was a large shortage in the corn which, however, was not known to the bank. [...] On the same day that he induced Allen to pay the draft for $5,487.47, Churchill immediately went to Stoneman, one of his indorsers and told him how he
-
35.
R. v. Lewis - [1996] 1 SCR 921 - 1996-04-25
Supreme Court JudgmentsAboriginal law
Allen Jacob Lewis Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent and between [...] Allen Frances Lewis Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent [...] 26 For the foregoing reasons, Wallace J.A. allowed the Crown's appeal of the acquittal of Allen Frances Lewis and Allen Jacob Lewis and dismissed the appeal of Jacob Kenneth Lewis of his conviction.
-
36.
Haldimand Election Case (Walsh v. Montague) - (1888) 15 SCR 495 - 1888-12-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsElections
On the Allen-Dougherty charge (Par. 4 in the notice) upon the question of agency The Stroud Case[11] was referred to. [...] There is another charge, that Allen, a scrutineer far the respondent, induced Dougherty, a voter to take a false oath. [...] Allen, who is now accused of having corruptly induced Dougherty to take a false oath, also expressed his opinion to be that Dougherty could conscientiously take the oath, and this expression of opinion is the sole foundation for the charge made against Allen.
-
37.
Ellis v. The Queen - (1893) 22 SCR 7 - 1893-02-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Present: Allen C. J., and Fraser J. The Queen v. John V. Ellis Re George F. Baird. [...] Allen C.J. The court is not prepared to pass any sentence; they have not considered it at all. [...] Present:—Allen C. J. and Fraser J. The Queen v. John V. Ellis re George F. Baird.
-
38.
Stein v. The King - [1928] SCR 553 - 1928-10-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Canadian Encyclopedic Digest, Ont. Ed., vol. 4, pp. 405, 406-7; Makin v. Att. Gen. for New South Wales, [1894] A.C. 57, at p. 70; Ibrahim v. R., [1914] A.C. 599, at p. 616; Allen v. R., 44 Can. S.C.R. 331; Gouin v. R., [1926] S.C.R. 539; R. v. Christie, [1914] A.C. 545, referred to. [...] This Court had, in the Allen Case[8], already taken the same view of the effect of the former section 1019 of the Criminal Code and, since the substitution for it in 1923 of s. 1014 (2) in its present form, the statement of the law made in the earlier case (Allen v. The King8) was reaffirmed in Gouin v. The King[9]. [...] Solicitor for the respondent: John Allen. [1] 37 Man. R. 367; [1928] 2 W.W.R. 346.
-
39.
Hafeez Fazl a.k.a. Fazl Hafeez v. Home Trust Company, et al. - 2023-02-16
Applications for Leave - DismissedHome Trust Company, 2256157 Ontario Ltd., Giuseppina Marchese and Allen Wellman [...] Compagnie Home Trust, 2256157 Ontario Ltd., Giuseppina Marchese et Allen Wellman [...] La demande d’autorisation d’appel de l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel de l’Ontario, numéro M52976 (C67953), 2022 ONCA 356, daté du 5 mai 2022, est rejetée avec dépens en faveur des intimés Compagnie Home Trust, 2256157 Ontario Ltd. et Allen Wellman.
-
40.
His Majesty the King in Right of Ontario, et al. v. Reginald Barker, et al. - 2023-03-30
Applications for Leave - DismissedStanley Kierstead, Denis Lepage, Christian Magee, Douglas Mccaul, Brian Floyd Mcinnes, Allen Mcmann, Leeford Miller, James Motherall by the Estate Trustees Deborah Karen Moroz and Jane Alexis Marion, Michael Roger Pinet, Edwin Sevels, Samuel Frederick Charles Shepherd and Shauna Taylor (formerly Vance H. Egglestone) [...] Stanley Kierstead, Denis Lepage, Christian Magee, Douglas Mccaul, Brian Floyd Mcinnes, Allen Mcmann, Leeford Miller, James Motherall by the Estate Trustees Deborah Karen Moroz and Jane Alexis Marion, Michael Roger Pinet, Edwin Sevels, Samuel Frederick Charles Shepherd and Shauna Taylor (formerly Vance H. Egglestone) [...] Denis Lepage, Christian Magee, Douglas Mccaul, Brian Floyd Mcinnes, Allen Mcmann, Leeford Miller, James Motherall par les fiduciaries de la succession Deborah Karen Moroz et Jane Alexis Marion, Michael Roger Pinet, Edwin Sevels, Samuel Frederick Charles Shepherd et Shauna Taylor (anciennement Vance H. Egglestone)
-
41.
Sandra Buschau et al. v. Rogers Communications Incorporated - 2010-04-08
Applications for LeaveSandra Buschau, Sharon M. Parent, Albert Poy, David Allen, Eileen Anderson, Christine Ash, Frederick Scott Atkinson, Jaspal Badyal, Mary Balfry, Carolyn Louise Barry, Raj Bhamber, Evelyn Bishop, Deborah Louise Bissonnette, George Boshko, Colleen Burke, Brian Carroll, Lynn Cassidy, Florence K. Colbeck, Peter Colistro, Ernest [...] Sandra Buschau, Sharon M. Parent, Albert Poy, David Allen, Eileen Anderson, Christine Ash, Frederick Scott Atkinson, Jaspal Badyal, Mary Balfry, Carolyn Louise Barry, Raj Bhamber, Evelyn Bishop, Deborah Louise Bissonnette, George Boshko, Colleen Burke, Brian Carroll, Lynn Cassidy, Florence K. Colbeck, Peter Colistro, Ernest
-
42.
R. v. Henry - 2005 SCC 76 - [2005] 3 SCR 609 - 2005-12-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Courts
Allen was a straightforward application of Noël and its correctness is confirmed. [...] The appeal thus comes to us as of right based on Hall J.A.’s dissent on the proper scope of Noël and Allen. [...] 6. Should the Court Reconsider Allen? 51 Allen was a straightforward application of Noël to an accused who was confronted with prior compelled testimony given at the trial of somebody else.
-
43.
Sandra Buschau et al. v. Rogers Communications Incorporated - 2013-02-14
Applications for LeaveSandra Buschau, Sharon M. Parent, Albert Poy, David Allen, Eileen Anderson, Christine Ash, Frederick Scott Atkinson, Jaspal Badyal, Mary Balfry, Carolyn Louise Barry, Raj Bhamber, Evelyn Bishop, Deborah Louise Bissonnette, George Boshko, Colleen Burke, Brian Carroll, Lynn Cassidy, Florence K. Colbeck, Peter Colistro, Ernest [...] Sandra Buschau, Sharon M. Parent, Albert Poy, David Allen, Eileen Anderson, Christine Ash, Frederick Scott Atkinson, Jaspal Badyal, Mary Balfry, Carolyn Louise Barry, Raj Bhamber, Evelyn Bishop, Deborah Louise Bissonnette, George Boshko, Colleen Burke, Brian Carroll, Lynn Cassidy, Florence K. Colbeck, Peter Colistro, Ernest
-
44.
Law Society of Saskatchewan v. Abrametz - 2022 SCC 29 - 2022-07-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
It found that there is little evidence of what Mr. Allen did during certain periods. [...] The Court determined that Mr. Allen should have finished his report by June 2013 based on the draft report (specifically its page count), the lack of “particulars” of what Mr. Allen did other than complete his trust report, and Mr. Huber’s time records: paras. 182-88. [...] The Law Society’s auditor, Mr. Allen, completed a trust report about 23 months later, in October 2014.
-
45.
R. v. Penunsi - 2019 SCC 39 - [2019] 3 SCR 91 - 2019-07-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
The Allen-Budreo line holds that the arrest and JIR provisions contained in Part XVI apply to peace bond proceedings. [...] The Allen-Budreo line was recently applied by the Yukon Territory Court of Appeal in R. v. Nowazek, 2018 YKCA 12, 366 C.C.C. (3d) 389. [...] The enactment of s. 507.1(9) does nothing, in my view, to detract from the authoritativeness of Allen, Wakelin, and Budreo.
-
46.
R. v. U. (F.J.) - [1995] 3 SCR 764 - 1995-10-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
7 The appellant was tried in the Ontario Court of Justice (General Division) before a jury, with Allen J. presiding. [...] Allen J. addressed the appellant's inculpatory statement as follows: [...] Allen J. then addressed the issue of the appellant's and J.U.'s credibility:
-
47.
Linton Construction Ltd. v. C.N.R. - [1975] 2 SCR 678 - 1974-10-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
In the same connection, Mr. Justice Allen observed, in the course of his reasons for judgment (p. 432 of 24 D.L.R. (3d)): [...] For all these reasons, as well as for those set forth in the reasons for judgment of Mr. Justice Allen, I would dismiss this appeal with costs. [...] Allen J.A., in giving reasons for the majority in the Appellate Division, said:
-
48.
Breckenridge Speedway Ltd. et al. v. R. - [1970] SCR 175 - 1969-10-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
For the reasons given by Allen J.A., which were approved by Smith C.J.A., Johnson J.A., and Kane J.A., I would hold that these three transfers were given by way of security. [...] Porter and Allen JJ.A., in separate judgments, held The Treasury Branches Act to be ultra vires. [...] but I differ from him and agree with Allen J.A. as to the three properties transferred as payment
-
49.
Theatre Amusement Co. v. Stone - (1914) 50 SCR 32 - 1914-05-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
The action was brought,. against the Theatre Amusement Company, Barney Allen, Julius Allen, Jay Junior Allen and a partnership firm known as The Canadian Film Exchange, by the present respon- [...] IDINGTON J.—The respondent and the three defendants, named Allen, owned in equal shares the corporate appellant and composed the partnership firm known as The Canadian Film Exchange.
-
50.
Zurich Life Insurance Co. of Canada v. Davies - [1981] 2 SCR 670 - 1981-12-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Allen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (1965), 208 A.2d 638, referred to. [...] The view taken by the New Jersey Supreme Court in Allen v. Metropoli- [...] ... Its position is that if Allen was actually insurable at the time of the application, he had full interim coverage, otherwise not, and that its own later determination of uninsurability, though made after knowledge of Allen’s death, is binding so long as it was made in good faith.