Recherche avancée
- toutes les collections (2,515)
- Décisions (1,097)
- Ressources (1,418)
2,515 résultat(s)
-
2,451.
The Manitoba Mortgage Company v. The Bank of Montreal - (1889) 17 SCR 692 - 1889-02-08
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Institutions financières
Christopher Robinson Q.C. for the respondents referred to Brandon v. Scott ([10]); Charles v. Blackwell ([11]); Smith v. Johnson ([12]).
-
2,452.
SCR | RCS (1889) vol 15 - 1889-01-01
Recueil des arrêts de la Cour suprême du CanadaD'Oechsner v. Scott . Dolbier u. Agricultural Ins. Co. . Doplan e. Blake. . xi WHERE REPORTED. PAGE. 4 East 469 351 4 Can. S. C,. [...] S. C. R. Vol. XV.J TABLE OF CASÉS NAME OF CASE. Mason v. Scott . Mathers v. Short . [...] Greenwood (7) ; D'Oechsner v. Scott (8) ; Doolan v. Blake (9) ; Freeman y. Flood (10).
-
2,453.
SCR | RCS (1888) vol 14 - 1888-12-31
Recueil des arrêts de la Cour suprême du CanadaHeyland v. Scott . ▪ Hicks v. Bell Hill v. O. S. & H. Ry. Co Holland v. Hodgson . [...] Scott v. Scott . . v Shepherd . • Scribner v. Kinloch . • Sea v. McLean. [...] That a new trial will not be granted in such a case, see McDermott v. Ireson (2), following Scott v. Scott (3) ; Fawcett v. Mothersell (4) ; The Queen v. Mcllroy (5) ; Murray v. Canada Central (6).
-
2,454.
Foot v. Foot - (1888) 15 SCR 699 - 1888-12-15
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Successions
Graham Q.C. for respondents referred to Re Grey's Settlements, Acason v. Greenwood[8]; D'Oechsner v. Scott[9]; Doolan v. Blake[10]; Freeman v. Flood[11].
-
2,455.
Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v. Chalifoux - (1888) 22 SCR 721 - 1888-06-14
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
Mr. Justice Scott, delivering the opinion of the court, said: On the night of the 20th February, 1872, the passengers cars on defendant's road were thrown from the track at a point a short distance from east of Mahomet station, by which plaintiff was severely injured.
-
2,456.
Byers v. McMillan - (1887) 15 SCR 194 - 1887-12-20
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Contrat
Re Mason and Scott ([13]). McNeely v. McWilliams ([14]). STRONG J.—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba, reversing the decision of Mr. Justice Dubuc, before whom the action was tried without a jury, and directing judgment to be entered for the plaintiffs in the action. [...] See also Evans v. Roe ([21]); Abrey v. Crux ([22]); Mason v. Scott ([23]); In this latter case it was held:—
-
2,457.
Confederation Life Association v. Miller - (1887) 14 SCR 330 - 1887-12-15
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Assurance
That a new trial will not be granted in such a case, see McDermott v. Ireson[13], following Scott v. Scott[14]; Fawcett v. Mothersell[15]; The Queen v. McIlroy[16]; Murray v. Canada Central[17].
-
2,458.
Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. v. Robinson - (1887) 14 SCR 105 - 1887-06-20
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Responsabilité civile
"The Court allows ten minutes in order to give time" to said Charles Scott to appear before this Court and " give his evidence. [...] "The time allowed by the Court to permit witness " Scott to appear having expired, the enquête of defendants is declared closed. [...] C. Scott's affidavit is as follows : Charles Scott, of Philadilphia, in the state of Pennsylvania, one of the United States of America, manufacturer. being duly sworn, doth depose and say:—
-
2,459.
SCR | RCS (1887) vol 13 - 1887-06-20
Recueil des arrêts de la Cour suprême du CanadaScott v. Liverpool . 28 L. J. (Ch.) 236 Scott v Lord Ebury . L. R. 2 C. P. 255 Scottish American Ins. Co. v. Turner . [...] Heiner v. Baxter (1) ; Scott v. Lord Ebury (2) ; Willmott v. Barber (3). [...] Solicitors ,for Appellant : Caston and Galt, Solicitors for Respondent : Walker and' Scott. 1886 CHARLES McCARRON et al (PLAIN- TIFFS) APPELLANTS; *March 19.
-
2,460.
Hovey v. Whiting - (1887) 14 SCR 515 - 1887-03-14
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit commercial
In Rose v. Scott[49] the goods in a chattel mortgage were described as:—
-
2,461.
Sherren v. Pearson - (1887) 14 SCR 581 - 1887-03-14
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit des biens
In Heyland v. Scott ([22]) Hagarty C.J. says: We are not prepared to hold that unenclosed woodland in this country can never be the subject of twenty years possession; if fencing and cultivation can alone constitute a possession then title to open woodland can never be acquired against the true owner..
-
2,462.
Shoolbred v. Union Fire Ins. Co. - (1887) 14 SCR 624 - 1887-03-14
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit commercial
Solicitors for respondents Scott & Walmsley: Bain, Laidlaw & Co. Solicitors for respondents the creditors: Foster, Clarke & Bowes.
-
2,463.
Shelburne Election Case - (1887) 14 SCR 258 - 1887-02-15
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Élections
R. W. Scott Q.C. for appellant contended that a copy of the petition was not served in time within five days after its presentation; that the order of the honorable the Chief Justice of Nova Scotia made in chambers,
-
2,464.
SCR | RCS (1887) vol 12 - 1887-01-01
Recueil des arrêts de la Cour suprême du CanadaScott v. DePeyster . l Edw. Ch 513. Scott v. McGrath . 7 Barb. (N. Y.) 53 Scripture v. Lowell Mutual Fire Ins. Co. . 10 Cush. [...] (13) 6 Scott N. R. 967; 6 M. & (6) 1 0 Paige 210. G. 245. °(7) 6 Barb. 91. [...] 608 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. [VOL. XII, 1886 stockholders, Scott v. Depeyster (I).
-
2,465.
McQueen v. The Queen - (1886) 16 SCR 1 - 1886-12-13
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Législation
[18] Scott v. Nixon, 3 Dr. & War. 388. [19] 17 Ves. 97. [20] Doe Duroure v. Jones, 4 T. R. 300; Cotterell v. Dutton, 4 Taun. 826; Homfray v. Scroope, 13 Q. B. 509; Rhodes v. Smethurst, 6 M. & W. 351; Skeffington v. Whitehurst, 3 Y. & C. 1; Beckford v. Wade, 17 Ves. 97.
-
2,466.
Beatty v. Neelon - (1886) 13 SCR 1 - 1886-11-08
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit commercial
Kelner v. Baxter[3]; Scott v. Lord Ebury[4]; Willmott v. Barber[5]. If the company should sue the action would be because they had not received property worth $9,500, and the shareholders guilty of the deceit would participate in the benefits of the action.
-
2,467.
McCarron v. McGreevy - (1886) 13 SCR 378 - 1886-05-06
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Contrat
Rly. Gas. ([2]); Scott v. Liverpool ([3]). Irvine Q.C. for respondent.
-
2,468.
Beatty v. North-West Transportation Co. - (1886) 12 SCR 598 - 1886-04-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Droit commercial
stockholders, Scott v. Depeyster[44]. All acts done by the directors officially should be for the interest of the cestuis que trust.
-
2,469.
Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. Vogel - (1886) 11 SCR 612 - 1886-03-09
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Transport
The Dominion Act 34 Vic. cap. 43 sec. 5, was passed with the obvious intention of restricting the power of railway companies contracting themselves free from liability for loss however caused, which act the Ontario courts in Scott v. Great Western Ry.[18] and Allan v. Great Western Ry.[19] decided did not apply to railways
-
2,470.
SCR | RCS (1886) vol 11 - 1886-03-09
Recueil des arrêts de la Cour suprême du CanadaScott v. The Great Western Ry. Sellers v. Dawson Seward v. Vera Cruz Seymour v. Osborne Q. WHERE REPORTED. PAGE. . 551 6, . 199 7 Can. S. C. R. 242 . 6 21 N. B. Rep. 178 . 486 1 App. Cas . 754 . 691 1 Keen 601. . [...] THOMAS R. JONES ROBERT T. A. SCOTT, AND NORMAN ROBERT- APPELLANTS ; 1884 SON (Plaintiffs) ... ,...,... [...] C o. with the obvious intention of restricting the power of Vof ~ } • H L. railway companies contracting themselves free from liability for loss however caused, which act the Ontario courts in Scott v. Great Western Ry. (1) and Allan y. Great Western Ry. (2) decided did not apply to railways incorporated before 1868 ; and
-
2,471.
Western Assurance Co. v. Doull - (1886) 12 SCR 446 - 1886-03-06
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Assurance
Billington v. Provincial Ins. Co.[1]; Scott v. McGrath[2]. Greer had no authority to settle this loss, and therefore the waiver amounts to nothing.
-
2,472.
McLean v. Garland - (1885) 13 SCR 366 - 1885-06-23
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Priorités et hypothèques
Solicitors for Respondent: Walker and Scott. [1] 10 Ont. App. R. 405.
-
2,473.
McAllister v. Forsyth - (1885) 12 SCR 1 - 1885-05-12
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Priorités et hypothèques
[16] 6. Scott N. R. 967; 6 M. & G. 245. [17] 3 H. & C. 955. [18] 2 T. R. 594 (note).
-
2,474.
SCR | RCS (1885) vol 10 - 1885-03-16
Recueil des arrêts de la Cour suprême du CanadaIngram v. Lawson • 8 Scott 471 . Ingram v. Lawson 6 Bing. I. J. Jacques Cartier Case, The . . 2 Can. S. C. R. 262 Jan es v. NV hitebread . . . 11 C. B. 406 Jolly v. Arbuthnot . 4 DeG. & •1. 224 . [...] Shrewsbury, Earl of, v. Scott • Shrewsbury Peerage Case . • Simpson v. Ingham . [...] And in Earl of Shrewsbury v. Scott (5), Cockburn, C.J., says (1) 9 Q. B. D. 672.
-
2,475.
West Northumberland Election Case - (1885) 10 SCR 635 - 1885-03-16
Jugements de la Cour suprême [ Anglais ]Élections
of the name of Polkinghorne for that of Scott would make almost every word said in that case equally applicable to the present one; the Stroud case[18]; the Durham case[19]; the 2nd Taunton case[20]; the 1st Taunton case[21]; the Bewdley case[22]; the Niagara case[23]; the Cornwall case[24]; the Charlevoix case[25].