Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
4,782 result(s)
-
4,376.
Hyde v. Lindsay - (1898) 29 SCR 99 - 1898-11-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
See Hurtubise v. Desmarteau[1]; Couture v. Bouchard[2]; Williams v. Irvine[3]; Cowen v. Evans[4]. [...] In the case of Williams v. Irvine[7], the action had been instituted in 1890, tried in June, 1891, and judgment reserved, subsequently given on the 17th November, 1891.
-
4,377.
Simpson et al. v. Palliser - (1898) 29 SCR 6 - 1898-10-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
WILLIAM JOHN SIMPSON AND OTHERS (DEFENDANTS) Appellant; And JOSEPH PALLISER (PLAINTIFF)
-
4,378.
Grand Trunk Railway Co. of Canada v. Anderson - (1898) 28 SCR 541 - 1898-06-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
On the 8th of February, 1895, one William McKenzie purchased from the railway company a return-ticket from the Village of Ailsa Craig, a station on the main line of the Grand Trunk Railway, to the City of London.
-
4,379.
Jordan v. Provincial Provident Institution - (1898) 28 SCR 554 - 1898-06-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
We make special reference to the words of Sir William Ritchie, C.J., in FitzRandolph v. The Mutual Relief Society of Nova Scotia[11] at page 336. [...] avoid the policy if a statement of a material fact contained in the declaration is untrue, even though not to the knowledge of the assured; Porter, Insurance, (2 ed.) page 140; Macdonald v. Law Union Fire and Life Insurance Company[19]; Bunyon, Life Insurance, p. 41; Cooke, Life Insurance, p. 35; Duckett v. Williams[20].
-
4,380.
Murray v. Jenkins - (1898) 28 SCR 565 - 1898-06-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
We contend that the memorandum in writing is insufficient under the statute of frauds; Williams v. Jordan[10]; Agnew, Statute of Frauds, p. 258.
-
4,381.
Province of Ontario & Province of Quebec v. Dominion of Canada. In re common School Fund & Lands - (1898) 28 SCR 609 - 1898-06-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Randall,[7]; Ingram v. Milnes,[8]; Smith v. Wilson,[9]; Bhear v. Harradine,[10]; Williams v. Wilson et al.[11]." [...] Signed, William McDougall, Commisssioner.' And then Mr. Shehyn continues:— [...] The question was passed upon by the executive on two or three different occasions, and it was treated as such, and the reason assigned by Mr. William MacDougall
-
4,382.
SCR | RCS (1898) vol 28 - 1898-06-14
Canada Supreme Court ReportsRees, in re; Williams v. Dav▪ ies Reese River Silver Mining Co. v. Atwell . . [...] See Eads v. Williams (1) at page 686 ; Ellison (1) 4 DeG. M. & G. 674. [...] William Pugsley. Arthur L Trueman. Moisons Bank A. C. Blair. H A. McKeown.
-
4,383.
Smith v. The Saint John Railway Co. / Consolidated Electric Co. v. Atlantic Trust Co. / Consolidated Electric Co. v. Pratt - (1898) 28 SCR 603 - 1898-06-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Solicitor for the appellants: William Pugsley. Solicitor for the respondents, The St. John City Railway Company and others: Arthur I. Trueman.
-
4,384.
Wallace v. Lea - (1898) 28 SCR 595 - 1898-06-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Margaret Wallace and William Wallace, Her Husband (Defendants) Appellants
-
4,385.
Ostrom v. Sills - (1898) 28 SCR 485 - 1898-05-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Clute Q.C. and Williams for the respondents. The principles applicable to public waters do not extend to the flow of mere surface water. [...] Solicitors for the respondent: Clute & Williams. [1] 24 Ont. App. R. 526.
-
4,386.
Cummings v. Taylor - (1898) 28 SCR 337 - 1898-05-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
William Cummings & Sons (Defendants) Appellants And Robert Taylor and Bauld Gibson & Co. (Plaintiffs) [...] William Cummings & Son being creditors of Neil McKinnon received the assets under the deed on account of the claim due to them by McKinnon and for which they were preferred. 2ndly. [...] After that determination the plaintiff Taylor instituted these proceedings, making the insolvent trustee under the assignment, and William Cummings & Sons and the Peoples' Bank of Halifax, the latter having received benefits under it, defendants, by which they sought:—
-
4,387.
MacKenzie v. Building & Loan Association - (1898) 28 SCR 407 - 1898-05-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
William MacKenzie (Defendant) Appellant; and The Building & Loan Association (Plaintiffs) Respondents. [...] GWYNNE J.—By an indenture of lease bearing date the first day of July, 1885, James Austin and William Arthurs did demise and let unto one William Snowden Thompson certain lands and tenements situate in the city of Toronto, particularly described in the said indenture, whereof they, the said James Austin and William Arthurs [...] By an indenture of demise by way of mortgage made upon the 10th day of November, 1885, the said William Snowden Thompson did assign and transfer unto the Building and Loan Association (the plaintiffs in
-
4,388.
Goodwin v. The Queen - (1898) 28 SCR 273 - 1898-03-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
See Eads v. Williams[25] at page 686; Ellison [Page 282] v. Bray[26].
-
4,389.
Glengoil SS. Co. v. Pilkington / Glengoil SS. Co. v. Ferguson - (1897) 28 SCR 146 - 1897-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsMaritime law
WILLIAM PILKINGTON AND OTHERS (PLAINTIFFS) Respondents. THE GLENGOIL STEAMSHIP CO. AND ROBERT GRAY (DEFENDANTS) [...] WILLIAM FERGUSON AND OTHERS (PLAINTIFFS) Respondents. 1897: Oct 12; 1897: Oct 13; 1897: Oct 14; 1897: Dec 9
-
4,390.
Haggert v. Brampton (Town) - (1897) 28 SCR 174 - 1897-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
Henderson v. Williams[7]; [Page 178] Blakely v. Dooley[8]; Auger v. Cook[9].
-
4,391.
In re Central Bank of Canada - (1897) 28 SCR 192 - 1897-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
the present Chief Justice, Sir William Meredith, then solicitor of the liquidators in the liquidation matter; that it was revised by the learned Chancellor, and so revised was introduced into Parliament and passed, and that the Master in Ordinary, before whom the proceedings in liquidation were conducted, had urged the
-
4,392.
Maloney v. Campbell - (1897) 28 SCR 228 - 1897-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
The appellant refers to Walker v. Dickson[20]; Canada Landed and National Investment Co. v. Shaver[21]; Williams v. Balfour[22], per Strong J. at pp. 479-481, refering to Campbell v. Robinson[23].
-
4,393.
Powell v. Watters - (1897) 28 SCR 133 - 1897-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
WILLIAM F. POWELL (DEFENDANT) Appellant; And THOMAS J WATTERS (PLAINTIFF)
-
4,394.
Small v. Thompson - (1897) 28 SCR 219 - 1897-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
See also Williams v. Balfour[15]. Aylesworth Q.C. for the respondent.—The uncontradicted testimony shows that respondent’s purchase of the property was upon the express condition and stipulation that she was not to assume or become liable for the mortgage thereon, but that Sinclair alone was to be liable for the mortgage
-
4,395.
In Re Ferguson - (1897) 28 SCR 38 - 1897-11-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
William Purdy, Carrie W. Eggleston, Jane H. Eggleston, Frank Purdy Eggleston, Emily Barnes, William Charles Ball, Emerson Coatsworth, and Emerson Coatsworth, Junior, Trustees of the Last Will and Testament of Edward Ferguson, Deceased (Defendants) Respondents. [...] Margaret Jane Carson, Mary Ann Bennett, Edward Galley, Emily Barnes, and William John Ball (Defendants) Respondents; [...] Wharton v. Barker[20]; In re Rees, Williams v. Davies[21]; Doe d. King v. Frost[22]; In re Taylor, Taylor v. Ley[23]; Pinder v. Pinder[24]; Clark v. Hayne[25].
-
4,396.
Knock v. Knock - (1897) 27 SCR 664 - 1897-11-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Lowe v. Carpenter[1]; Wright v. Williams[2]; Earl de la War v. Miles[3]; Hollins v. Verney[4].
-
4,397.
SCR | RCS (1897) vol 27 - 1897-11-10
Canada Supreme Court ReportsL. R. 2 Eq. 736 Williams v. Leonard . 26 Can. S. C. R. 406 Wills v. Wills . [...] I would like to know how your brother William is getting on and what he is doing for a living. [...] CONTROVERTED ELECTION FOR THE ELECTORAL DISTRICT OF MARQUETTE. WILLIAM G-.
-
4,398.
O'Donohoe v. Bourne - (1897) 27 SCR 654 - 1897-10-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
See Maritime Bunk v. Stewart[7]; In re Cahan[8]; McGugan v. McGugan[9]; Williams v. Leonard[10].
-
4,399.
Ernst v. Zwicker - (1897) 27 SCR 594 - 1897-06-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
Leach v. Jay[15]; Morrall v. Sutton[16]; Lloyd v. Jackson[17]. 2 Jarman, "Wills," (5 ed.) 1205 to 1217 and 930. 2 Williams, "Executors," (9 Eng. ed.) [...] The then Chief Justice of that court, the late Sir William Young, in his elaborate judgment in that case shews that the terms "fee simple absolute" and "valid remainder" as used in ch. 112 and the sentence in which they are found were taken from a statute of the State of New York without their context in that statute, which [...] Now whatever the draftsman of this obscure statute, ch. 112, contemplated by framing into a statute what Chief Justice Sir William Young has shown to be an imperfect extract from a statute of the State of New York, it is plain, I think, that the legislature of Nova Scotia did not by it abolish estates tail having a
-
4,400.
Robertson v. Davis - (1897) 27 SCR 571 - 1897-06-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
WILLIAM H. DAVIS (DEFENDANT) Respondent. 1897: May 14; 1897: June 7 [...] The cases cited and remarks of Sir William Ritchie C.J. in Starrs v. Cosgraee ([3]), show the distinctions between that case and the present one.