Advanced Search
- All Databases (4,782)
- Decisions (2,369)
- Resources (2,169)
4,782 result(s)
-
226.
Judgments in Leave Applications - 2021-08-19
News Releases1770650 Ontario Inc. v. Williams McEnery, Williams Litigation Lawyers and Paul McEnery (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (39643) [...] La demande d’autorisation d’appel de l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel de l’Ontario, numéro C68191, 2021 ONCA 129, daté du 2 mars 2021, est rejetée avec dépens en faveur des intimés Williams McEnery et Williams Litigation Lawyers. [...] 1062484 Ontario Inc. v. Williams McEnery, Williams Litigation Lawyers and Paul McEnery (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (39644)
-
227.
Proctor et al. v. Dyck et al. - [1953] 1 SCR 244 - 1953-03-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
John Dyck, William Duncan and James Duncan (Defendants) Respondents. [...] With the exception of William the children with whose claims we are concerned were not dependent upon the deceased. [...] William was living at home and receiving spending money and money for his clothing from the deceased.
-
228.
Stahl v. Miller - (1918) 56 SCR 312 - 1918-03-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
William Miller and John Kildall (Defendants) Respondents. 1918: February 27; 1918: March 5. [...] BRODEUR J.—Stahl had given a power of attorney to William Miller and to the firm J. J. Miller, of which William Miller was a member. [...] It happened that the Kildall estate, of which William Miller was one of the trustees, had some property for sale, and an agreement for sale of some lots was then signed by the trustees of the Kildall estate of which William Miller was one, in favour of Stahl, and the agreement was then signed by William Miller as agent for
-
229.
Bulletin of January 18, 2019 - 2019-01-18
BulletinsShe pays Williams a monthly rental fee for the space and facilities. Williams authorized Ms. Brunning to use its letterhead that references her as “Practicing in Association, not in Partnership”. [...] Williams’ website includes a photo of Ms. Brunning, along with photos of the Williams lawyers under the titles “Our Lawyers” and “Meet Our Team”. [...] The motions judge granted the motion and dismissed the action against Williams.
-
230.
Governments of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba v. Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. - [1925] SCR 155 - 1925-02-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsStatutes
(c) Are the rates therein provided applicable to traffic westbound from Fort William and from all points east of Fort William now on the Canadian Pacific Railway company's railway; or, are such rates confined to westbound traffic originating at Fort William and at such points east of Fort William as were, at the date of the [...] of Fort William, to Fort William and Port Arthur, and all points east, beyond the maximum rates specified in the Crow's Nest Pass Act and Agreement, and referred to in chapter 41, Statutes of Canada (1922). [...] (a) Are the rates therein provided applicable to traffic westbound from Fort William and from all points east of Fort William now on the Canadian Pacific Railway Company's railway; or, are such rates confined to westbound traffic originating at Fort William and at such points east of Fort William as were at the date of the
-
231.
R. v. Spence - 2005 SCC 71 - [2005] 3 SCR 458 - 2005-12-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
28 The respondent relies on the following observation of McLachlin J. in Williams, at para. 28: [...] 29 Williams involved an aboriginal man charged with robbery of a white employee of a pizza store. [...] Their submissions carry us well beyond the specific context in which Williams and Parks were decided.
-
232.
Canadian Pacific Railway Co. et al. v. Board of trade of city of Regina - (1911) 45 SCR 321 - 1911-12-06
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
Fort William to Winnipeg ................ 89 75 60 45 40 34 [...] "(j) In the present case, the City of Regina has complained that the rates to Regina, from Port William, are higher in proportion than the rates from Fort William to Winnipeg and are, therefore, unjustly discriminatory as between localities. [...] Fort William to Winnipeg than to Regina: (a) With regard to the Canadian Northern Railway Company; (6) with regard to the Canadian Pacific Railway Company?
-
233.
Queen's County, P.E.I., Election Case (Davies v. Hennessy) & Prince County, P.E.I., Election Case (Perry v. Cameron) - (1891) 20 SCR 26 - 1891-11-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsElections
Louis H. Davies and William Welsh (Respondents) Appellants; and William Hennessy (Petitioner) Respondent; [...] Henry Davies and William Welsh at said election as members for the House of Commons for said electoral district. [...] (Signed) WILLIAM HENNESSY. To Louis Henry Davies and William Welsh.
-
234.
Stevenson v. Canadian Bank of Commerce - (1893) 23 SCR 530 - 1893-02-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsBankruptcy and insolvency
William E. Elliott, the insolvent, was connected with two businesses in Montreal l [...] GWYNNE J. The plaintiff suet as curator of the estate of one William E. Elliott who on the 18th. [...] When William E. Elliott left for England it appears, as testified by [Page 552]
-
235.
Green v. Citizens Insurance Co. - (1890) 18 SCR 338 - 1890-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsArbitration
The judgment of Williams J. has been generally received as a correct statement of the law and was expressly approved in the case of Dinn v. Blake[26]. [...] And in that case Williams J. says: This provision of the statute was intended merely to introduce into every order of reference the clause familiarly known as “Mr. Richards’ clause.” [...] I find the remarks of Williams J., to which I have adverted, quoted by Brett J. in Dinn v. Blake[56] as if immediately addressed to the question of referring back an award.
-
236.
Oliver Blais Co. Ltd. v. Yachuk - [1946] SCR 1 - 1945-11-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
William spent his money for that purpose but Victor retained his for the purchase of the gasoline. [...] William then sent his brother to their house for the bulrushes and some matches. [...] With respect to the infant plaintiff, William Yachuk, the learned trial judge found as follows:
-
237.
Bickford v. Chatham (Township) - (1889) 16 SCR 235 - 1889-01-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
I think the construction of the clause of the agreement in relation to the Colborne and William streets station which is as follows[22]:— [...] The defendants claim it is to be on lands of, or to be purchased by, the plaintiff at or near the corner of Colborne and William streets. [...] The agreement as to the station being at or near the corner of Colborne and William street is not mentioned
-
238.
Kandick v. Morrison - (1877) 2 SCR 12 - 1877-06-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
William Kandick Appellant And Robert H. Morrison Respondent 1877: June 8, 9 [...] "which were of William Morrison, deceased, at the time of his death, in the hands of William Kandick to be administered, if the said William Kandick have so much thereof in his hands to be administered, or if not so much in his hands, then to make the costs out of the proper goods and chattels of said William Kandick." [...] "The within named William Kandick has no goods or chattels which were of the within named William Morrison, at the time of his death in his hands, to be administered in my bailiwick, whereof I can cause to be made the sum of $164.28 and interest, or any part
-
239.
McDonald v. McDonald - (1892) 21 SCR 201 - 1892-04-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
Then he divided the rear one hundred acres, namely, east half of 18 in the 7th between his sons William and Alexander, giving William the east half and the defendant Alexander the west half, the fifty acres in question. [...] the 300 acres to his brother William for the expressed consideration of $2,000, out of which William was to pay the mortgage to the bank which was done, but William afterwards got into difficulties and the land was again sold by the sheriff under execution against William’s lands and was bought by the plaintiff for $599. [...] Nor is it disputed that after the conveyance of the land by the plaintiff to his brother William in 1853, and
-
240.
Mohammed Al-Ghamdi v. College and Association of Registered Nurses of Alberta, et al. - 2021-02-25
Applications for Leave - DismissedMueller, Sheila Dykhuizen, Vickie Kaminski, Deb Gordon, Holly Ljuden, Manish Joshi, Bonny Nelson, Cheryl Meriot, William Hondas, Karen Espersen, Jason Becker, Karen Bouman, Trevor William Theman, James West, Owen Robert Heisler, Kate Reed, Craig Boyer, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, John Doe and Jane Doe [...] Mueller, Sheila Dykhuizen, Vickie Kaminski, Deb Gordon, Holly Ljuden, Manish Joshi, Bonny Nelson, Cheryl Meriot, William Hondas, Karen Espersen, Jason Becker, Karen Bouman, Trevor William Theman, James West, Owen Robert Heisler, Kate Reed, Craig Boyer, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, M. Untel et Mme Unetelle [...] Dawson, Doug Perry, Bryce Henderson, Carol Rowntree, Saifee Rashiq and Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP, and College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta in relation to the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta Action No. 1504 00079, and Trevor William Theman in relation to the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta Action No. 1504 00079.
-
241.
Judgments to be Rendered in Leave Applications / Prochains jugements sur demandes d'autorisation - 2010-04-12
News Releases2. William Gallos v. City of Toronto (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (33548) [...] 33548 William Gallos c. Ville de Toronto (Ont.) (Civile) (Sur autorisation) [...] – Le juge Williams a-t-il commis une erreur judiciaire en ne statuant pas sur la question de savoir quelle preuve est admissible?
-
242.
Manuge v. Dominion Atlantic Railway Co. - [1973] SCR 232 - 1972-10-18
Supreme Court JudgmentsMotor vehicles
Transportation
Everett William Killam and Myrtle Deltina Killam (Plaintiffs). Everett William Killam and Myrtle Deltina Killam (Plaintiffs) Appellants; [...] A. Boyd MacGillivray, Q.C., for Everett William Killam and Myrtle Deltina Killam. [...] The evidence of the plaintiff, Everett William Killam, was that he had made a
-
243.
Judgments to be Rendered in Leave Applications - 2014-07-21
News ReleasesMr. Williams applied for judicial review of the Pension Appeals Board on December 7, 2012. [...] John Williams c. Ministre des Ressources humaines et du Développement des compétences [...] M. Williams s’est vu accorder une pension d’invalidité du RPC en mai 1995.
-
244.
Elliot C. Wightman, et al. v. Estate of Peter N. Widdrington - 2014-01-09
Applications for LeaveRonald P. Gratton, C. Roy Krake, John E. Lawrence, Gerald A.M. Luijkx, Roderick W. Maclean, Dale S. Meister, Estate of William E. Patterson, Brian K. Pawluck, A.W. Keith Anderson, Daniel J. Block, William D. Burch, Barry L. James, Donald A. MacLean, John A. MacNutt, Melvin J. Majean, Alan D. Martin, Frederick M. [...] P. Gratton, C. Roy Krake, John E. Lawrence, Gerald A.M. Luijkx, Roderick W. Maclean, Dale S. Meister, Succession de William E. Patterson, Brian K. Pawluck, A.W. Keith Anderson, Daniel J. Block, William D. Burch, Barry L. James, Donald A. MacLean, John A. MacNutt, Melvin J. Majean, Alan D. Martin, Frederick M.
-
245.
Craig Melanson, et al. v. Province of New Brunswick, as represented by The Honourable Bradley Green, Attorney Superintendent of Pensions for the Province of New Brunswick, et al. - 2007-09-20
Applications for LeaveGrant, Robert Grant, Russell Grant, James Grennan, Donald Harris, Randolph Harrison, Arnold Hickey, Donald Hickey, Eugene Hill, George Hill, William Howard, S. Bill Hughson, William Ingram, Claude Jean, David Johnsen, H. Wayn Keswick, Wallace Ketch, Sandor Kovacs, Merel Lanteigne, J. Donald Lavigne, Robin Lawson, Maurice [...] Grant, Robert Grant, Russell Grant, James Grennan, Donald Harris, Randolph Harrison, Arnold Hickey, Donald Hickey, Eugene Hill, George Hill, William Howard, S. Bill Hughson, William Ingram, Claude Jean, David Johnsen, H. Wayn Keswick, Wallace Ketch, Sandor Kovacs, Merel Lanteigne, J. Donald Lavigne, Robin Lawson, Maurice
-
246.
In re W.H. Brookfield Estate The Royal Trust Company v. The King - [1949] SCR 329 - 1949-02-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
Lord Uthwatt proceeded to say that The principle laid down in the Williams case was that if it were possible on rational grounds to prefer one of the alternative [...] In Rex v. Williams[13], this was declared to mean, dealt with as between the shareholder and the company. [...] In adverting to the fact that the certificates in the Williams' case had been endorsed in blank, their Lordships said at page 557:
-
247.
Dubé v. Canada - 2011 SCC 39 - [2011] 2 SCR 764 - 2011-07-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsAboriginal law
Taxation
Williams v. Canada, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 877, could be read as suggesting that it should because, as noted in Bastien, there are some parallels between the unemployment insurance benefits at issue in Williams and the interest income in issue here. [...] [25] In Williams, the entitlement to the benefits in issue was earned through qualifying employment. [...] There is an analogy between the qualifying employment in Williams and the capital invested in this case: in Williams, it was the employment that gave rise to the benefits, and in this case, the capital is what gave rise to the interest.
-
248.
British American Assurance Co. v. Law & Co. - (1892) 21 SCR 325 - 1892-10-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsInsurance
William Law & Co. And Others (Plaintiffs) Respondents 1892: May 9; 1892: Oct. 10. [...] Borden Q.C. for the respondents, cited Williams v. Roger Williams Insurance Co.[2]; Insurance Co. v. Baring[3]; Hooper v. Robinson[4]. [...] William Law & Co., on account of owners, in case of loss to be paid to William Law & Co., do make insurance, and cause to be insured, lost or not lost, the sum of two thousand dollars, on advances upon the body, tackle, apparel and other furniture of the good barque Lizzie Perry.
-
249.
May v. Logie - (1897) 27 SCR 443 - 1897-05-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Q. And that those persons you have named were the only survivors of William Pidgen? [...] When William Pidgen died in 1878 the law of Ontario on the subject of the descent of real property was regulated by the Act of 1852, and under that Act, William Pidgen having died without issue, his heir at law was his father, if living. [...] Solicitors for the respondent: William Mortimer Clark & Gray. [1] 23 Ont. App. R. 785.
-
250.
In re Representation of P.E.I. in the House of Commons - (1903) 33 SCR 594 - 1903-06-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Mr. Williams: And more so for the interpretation of the constitution. [...] Mr. Williams: I have nothing except the opinion given by members of the bar. [...] Mr. Williams: Well my Lord I will read Vansittart for your Lordship.