Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
2,511 result(s)
-
2,426.
Scott v. The Bank of New Brunswick - (1892) 21 SCR 30 - 1892-05-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
Scott v. The Bank of New Brunswick, (1892) 21 SCR 30 Supreme Court of Canada [...] Scott v. The Bank of New Brunswick (1892) 21 SCR 30 Date: 1892-05-16 [...] Scott v. The Bank of New Brunswick 1892: May 16. Present:—Sir W. J. Ritchie C.J., and Strong, Taschereau, Gwynne and Patterson JJ.
-
2,427.
SCR | RCS (1892) vol 20 - 1892-05-09
Canada Supreme Court Reportsxviii TABLE OF CASES CITED. [S. C.R. Vol. XX NAME OF CASE. Nobel's Explosives Co. v. Jones, Scott & Co. .17 Ch. D. 721 . [...] Moss Q.C. for the appellants cited James v. Smith (1); Nobel's Explosives Co. v. Jones, Scott & Co. (2).
-
2,428.
Peers v. Elliott - (1892) 21 SCR 19 - 1892-05-02
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
As to what will constitute negligence see Pickard v. Smith[2]; Scott v. London Dock Co.[3]
-
2,429.
SCR | RCS (1892) vol 19 - 1892-05-02
Canada Supreme Court ReportsScott v. Clifton Local Board Séminaire de Québec v. Poitras Senior v. Ward . . [...] Solicitors for appellant : Walker, Scott. Lees. Solibitors for respondent : Carscallen 4- Cuhill. [...] The legislature must be understood to mean what it (1) 2 Scott (N.R.) 531.
-
2,430.
Barton v. McMillan - (1892) 20 SCR 404 - 1892-04-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsContract
Moss Q.C. for the appellants cited James v. Smith[1]; Nobel’s Explosives Co. v. Jones, Scott & Co.[2]
-
2,431.
Bernardin v. The Municipality of North Dufferin - (1891) 19 SCR 581 - 1891-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
The latest case is Scott v. Clifton School Board ([3]) ; and see Clarke v. Cuckfield Union ([4]); followed in Nicholson v. Bradfield Union ([5]); Sanders v. St. Neat’s Union ([6]), approved in Smart v. Guardians of West Ham Union ([7]). [...] In December, 1884, the case of Scott v. Clifton, School Board (3) was decided by Mathew J. The action was by an architect to recover payment for plans prepared for the school board which is a corporate body.
-
2,432.
McKean v. Jones - (1891) 19 SCR 489 - 1891-11-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
Malcolm v. Scott[1]; Liversidge v. Broadbent[2]; Burn v. Carvalho[3].
-
2,433.
Barrett v. The City of Winnipeg - (1891) 19 SCR 374 - 1891-10-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
seems to do any violence to the language of the clause it is only by treating the word “by ” where it is understood before the word “ practice,” as not having precisely the same force as when expressed before the word “law.” But, as once remarked by one of the most eminent English judges, Lord Stowell, when Sir W. Scott— [...] [13] 2 Scott (N.B.) 531. 1 1 A. & E. 142. [14] 4 Q. B. D. 261. [15] 1 Pugs.
-
2,434.
McRae v. Marshall - (1891) 19 SCR 10 - 1891-06-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
Solicitors for appellant: Walker, Scott & Lees. Solicitors for respondent: Carscallen & Cahill.
-
2,435.
SCR | RCS (1891) vol 18 - 1891-03-11
Canada Supreme Court ReportsClark v. Molyneux Clarkson v Scott Clough v. Bond . v. Dixon . Cobham v. Dalton . [...] Cushing v. Dupuy . xi WHERE REPORTED. PAGE. 1 L. M. & P. 455 341 111 U. S. R. 777 3 2 Dowl. 748 ; 3 M. &" 126 Scott 552 . [...] N. C. 267 S. Scales v. East London Water- works Co . 1 Hodges 91 Scott v. Miller .
-
2,436.
Gray v. Coughlin - (1891) 18 SCR 553 - 1891-01-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
Scott Q.C. for the respondent cited DeColyar on Guarantees[11]; Brand on Suretyship and Guarantee[12]; Patterson v. Hope[13]; Newton v. Charlton[14]; Farebrother v. Wodehouse[15] Duncan & Co. v. North and South Wales Bank[16]; Forbes v. Jackson[17]. [...] Solicitor for respondent: Henry J. Scott. [1] 16 Ont. App. R. 224; sub-nomine McLellan v. Gray.
-
2,437.
Green v. Citizens Insurance Co. - (1890) 18 SCR 338 - 1890-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsArbitration
[14] 8 Scott 180. [15] 3 K. & J. 66. [16] P. 261. [17] 10 Q.B.D. 295.
-
2,438.
Williams v. Balfour - (1890) 18 SCR 472 - 1890-12-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
S. H. Blake Q. C. and Wilson for the appellants referred to Nichols v. Watson ([1]); Clarkson v. Scott ([2]); Real Estate Loan Company v. Molesworth ([3]); Gandy v. Gandy ([4]).
-
2,439.
Archibald v. Hubley - (1890) 18 SCR 116 - 1890-11-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsSale
[32] 3 M. & Scott 552. [33] 2 Chitty 239. [34] Jud. Act sec. 45.
-
2,440.
MacDougall v. The Law Society of Upper Canada - (1890) 18 SCR 203 - 1890-11-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsProfessional law
Scott v. Miller[14]; Candler v. Candler[15]; Sterry v. Clifton[16]; Lindley on Partnership.
-
2,441.
SCR | RCS (1890) vol 17 - 1890-11-04
Canada Supreme Court ReportsBrandon v. Scott Bridges v. North London R'y. Co. Brogden v. Metropolitan R'y Co. Brooks v. County of Haldimand. [...] Maguire v. Scott • Mallette v. City of Montreal • Manning v. D: arming . . [...] Scott v. GI eat Western Railway Co. Seixo v. Provegende . . Selwyn v. Garfit. .
-
2,442.
Clarkson v. Ryan - (1890) 17 SCR 251 - 1890-06-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
Aylesworth for the respondent cited Allan v. The Great Western Railway Co.[6]; Scott v. The Great Western Railway Co.[7]
-
2,443.
Davis v. Kerr - (1890) 17 SCR 235 - 1890-03-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsAgency
I need only refer on this and other points arising on the case, to the authorities cited in Miller v. Demeule ([25]) * and to Gagnon v Sylva ([26]); Venner v. Lortie ([27]) : Demolombe ([28]); Laurent ([29]); Sirey ([30]); Sirey ([31]); Urquhart v. Scott ([32]); Payne v. Scott ([33]).
-
2,444.
SCR | RCS (1890) vol 16 - 1890-01-01
Canada Supreme Court Reportsxviii TABLE OF CASES CITED. [S. C. R. Vol. XVI. NAME OF CASE. Scaramanga v. Scamp. i Scott y. Nixon . 3 Dr. & War. 388 Seaton v. Grant . . 2 Ch. App. 459 . [...] W. H. Kerr Q.C. and Scott Q.C. for the respondent. The judgment of the court was delivered by STRONG J.—The court is of opinion that the motion to quash this appeal must be granted. [...] Solicitor for respondent : H. .T. Scott. (4) R. S. O. ch. 135. VOL. XVI.] SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. 399 LES ECCLÉSIASTIQUES DE ST. 1889 SULPICE DE MONTREAL (DEFEN- APPELLANTS; *Jan ls.
-
2,445.
Shaw v. Caldwell - (1889) 17 SCR 357 - 1889-04-30
Supreme Court JudgmentsCommercial law
note for the sum so borrowed, and he afterwards uses the proceeds of the note in the partnership business of his own free will without being under any obligation to, or contract with, the lender so to do, the partnership is not liable for said loan, under Art. 1867 C.C. Maguire v. Scott, 7 L. C. R. 451, distinguished. [...] Maguire v. Scott, ([3]) and Codifiers' Report on Partnership ([4]). The authorities relied on by respondents in the court below are not applicable as art. 1867 is not to be found in the French Code. [...] The case of Maguire v. Scott (2) referred to in the authorities under article 1867 is entirely different from the present one; in that case it was a purchase of goods by one partner in his own name, the seller being
-
2,446.
In re Smart - (1889) 16 SCR 396 - 1889-04-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
W.H. Kerr Q.C. and Scott Q.C. for the respondent. The judgment of the court was delivered by [...] Solicitor for respondent: H.J. Scott. [1] 12 Ont. P.R. 635. [2] 12 Ont. P.R. 312.
-
2,447.
The Manitoba Mortgage Company v. The Bank of Montreal - (1889) 17 SCR 692 - 1889-02-08
Supreme Court JudgmentsFinancial institutions
Christopher Robinson Q.C. for the respondents referred to Brandon v. Scott ([10]); Charles v. Blackwell ([11]); Smith v. Johnson ([12]).
-
2,448.
SCR | RCS (1889) vol 15 - 1889-01-01
Canada Supreme Court ReportsD'Oechsner v. Scott . Dolbier u. Agricultural Ins. Co. . Doplan e. Blake. . xi WHERE REPORTED. PAGE. 4 East 469 351 4 Can. S. C,. [...] S. C. R. Vol. XV.J TABLE OF CASÉS NAME OF CASE. Mason v. Scott . Mathers v. Short . [...] Greenwood (7) ; D'Oechsner v. Scott (8) ; Doolan v. Blake (9) ; Freeman y. Flood (10).
-
2,449.
SCR | RCS (1888) vol 14 - 1888-12-31
Canada Supreme Court ReportsHeyland v. Scott . ▪ Hicks v. Bell Hill v. O. S. & H. Ry. Co Holland v. Hodgson . [...] Scott v. Scott . . v Shepherd . • Scribner v. Kinloch . • Sea v. McLean. [...] That a new trial will not be granted in such a case, see McDermott v. Ireson (2), following Scott v. Scott (3) ; Fawcett v. Mothersell (4) ; The Queen v. Mcllroy (5) ; Murray v. Canada Central (6).
-
2,450.
Foot v. Foot - (1888) 15 SCR 699 - 1888-12-15
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Graham Q.C. for respondents referred to Re Grey's Settlements, Acason v. Greenwood[8]; D'Oechsner v. Scott[9]; Doolan v. Blake[10]; Freeman v. Flood[11].