Advanced Search
- All Databases (1,254)
- Decisions (530)
- Resources (724)
1,254 result(s)
-
851.
Bulletin of October 9, 1998 - 1998-10-09
BulletinsPatrick Allen Bazley (B.C.) Requête en prorogation de délai et en autorisation d'intervenir
-
852.
Bulletin of July 24, 1998 - 1998-07-24
BulletinsPatrick Allen Bazley (B.C.) Requête en autorisation d’intervention
-
853.
Bulletin of December 6, 1996 - 1996-12-06
BulletinsDavid Allen Gauthier c. (25022) Corporation municipale de Ville de Lac Brome et al.
-
854.
Bulletin of October 8, 1993 - 1993-10-08
BulletinsWilloughby Allen v. (23655) Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.)(Ont.) (motion)
-
855.
Sauvageau v. The King - [1950] SCR 664 - 1950-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsState
...Now, before discussing the case of Allen v. Flood (1898 A.C. 1) and what was decided therein, there are two observations of a general character which I wish to make, and one is to repeat what I have very often said before, that every judgment must be read as applicable to the particular facts proved, or assumed to be
-
856.
Gray v. Richford - (1878) 2 SCR 431 - 1878-06-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsEstates
Stephens v. Allen[12]; Jones v. Duff[13]; Armstrong v. Bowes[14]; Donnelly v. Rawden[15]; Doe v. Needs[16].
-
857.
Nicholls v. Cumming - (1877) 1 SCR 395 - 1877-06-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsTaxation
As to the general construction of such statutes: Partington v. Attorney General[26]; Brown’s Leg. Max.[27] Sedgwick on Statutes and Constitutional Law[28]; Maxwell on Statutes[29]; Newton v. Cowie[30]; Brooks v. Cock[31]; Cooley, Constitutional Limitations[32]; People v. Allen[33]; Dwarris on Statutes[34]; Newell v.
-
858.
Judgments to be Rendered in Leave Applications - 2022-04-04
News Releases1. James Allen Anderson v. Diana Anderson (Sask.) (Civil) (By Leave) (39884)
-
859.
Bulletin of May 27, 2016 - 2016-05-27
BulletinsFrederick Allen Clark v. (36813) Her Majesty the Queen (B.C.) (By Leave)
-
860.
Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2011 SCC 2 - [2011] 1 SCR 19 - 2011-01-28
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Greenspan, Edward L. “Comment: Another Argument Against Television in the Courtroom”, in Philip Anisman and Allen M. Linden, eds., The Media, the Courts and the Charter.
-
861.
Bulletin of July 9, 2010 - 2010-07-09
BulletinsGeorge William Allen v. (33558) Her Majesty the Queen (Crim.) (Alta.)
-
862.
Bulletin of April 25, 2003 - 2003-04-25
BulletinsAllen and Nancy Singer (Ont.) Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour signifier et déposer la réponse des intimés
-
863.
Bulletin of February 21, 2003 - 2003-02-21
BulletinsAllen and Nancy Singer (Ont.) Kevin D. Sherkin Levine, Sherkin, Boussidan
-
864.
Bulletin of December 13, 2002 - 2002-12-13
BulletinsAudrey Allen et al. (Alta.) (Civil) (By Leave) David Ross and Hugh J. D. MacPhail, Q.C. for the appellants.
-
865.
Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd. - 2002 SCC 77 - [2002] 4 SCR 153 - 2002-12-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsIntellectual property
Interpharm Inc. and Allen Barry Shechtman Respondents Indexed as: Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd.
-
866.
Bulletin of January 25, 2002 - 2002-01-25
BulletinsAllen G. Doyle for the appellant. W. Stephen Wood, Q.C. for the respondent.
-
867.
Bulletin of May 19, 2000 - 2000-05-19
BulletinsRaven, Allen, Cameron & Ballantyne v. (27901) The Attorney General of Canada et al.
-
868.
Bulletin of May 12, 2000 - 2000-05-12
Bulletins27417 DUCA COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION LIMITED ‑ v. ‑ ALLEN SUGARMAN, IN TRUST, PRESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORP., YONGE CRESCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED and MINICORP REALTY INC. (Ont.)
-
869.
Bulletin of February 19, 1999 - 1999-02-19
Bulletins26858 LITTLE SISTERS BOOK AND ART EMPORIUM, B.C. CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION, JAMES EATON DEVA and GUY ALLEN BRUCE SMYTHE - v. - MINISTER OF JUSTICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA AND MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (B.C.)
-
870.
Bulletin of April 19, 1996 - 1996-04-19
BulletinsRaven, Jewitt & Allen v. (25257) Her Majesty The Queen in right of Canada as represented by Treasury Board (F.C.A.)
-
871.
Asamera Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Sea Oil & General Corporation et al. - [1979] 1 SCR 633 - 1978-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
The rule of highest intermediate value up to the time of trial formerly prevailed in that State, and may be found laid down in Romaine v. Van Allen, 26 N.Y. 309, and Markham v. Jaudon, 41 N.Y. 235, and other cases,—although the rigid application of the rule was deprecated by the New York Superior Court in an able opinion by
-
872.
SCR | RCS [1978] vol 1 - 1978-01-01
Canada Supreme Court ReportsThe Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal of Allen Robindaine and Jeannette Martineau because it found no manifest error in the trial judgment. [...] The appeal d'Allen Robindaine et de Jeannette Martineau doit of Allen Robindaine and Jeannette Martineau donc être rejeté sous réserve d'une correction must therefore be dismissed, subject to a minor mineure dont il sera question plus loin. correction which will be considered later. [...] If it may be subséquemment décédée», c'est-à-dire contraire à son construed for his interest or against it (Massey v. Allen) intérêt lorsqu'elle le fait.
-
873.
Part 4, 2020 Vol. 3 ([2020] 3 SCR i-lxviii 785-1033) - 2020-12-18
Canada Supreme Court ReportsAllen v. Flood ...................................................................................... [...] Linden, Allen M., and Bruce Feldthusen. Canadian Tort Law, 10th ed., Toronto, LexisNexis, 2015 ............. [...] Linden, Allen M., et al., Canadian Tort Law, 11th ed., Toronto, LexisNexis, 2018 .........................................
-
874.
Bulletin of October 6, 2000 - 2000-10-06
BulletinsJudith L. Allen Raven, Allen Cameron & Ballantyne v. (28105) Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada et al. [...] David Allen Thompson (Sask.) G. Kuse Cullenaere Kendall Katzman & Richards
-
875.
Thomson Newspapers Ltd. v. Canada (Director of Investigation and Research, Restrictive Trade Practices Commission) - [1990] 1 SCR 425 - 1990-03-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsCompetition law
Constitutional law
Evidence
Irvine v. Canada (Restrictive Trade Practices Commission), [1987] 1 S.C.R. 181; Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc., 555 F.2d 862 (1977); People v. Allen, 103 N.E.2d 92 (1952); Federal Trade Commission v. Tuttle, 244 F.2d 605 (1957); Adams v. Federal Trade Commission, 296 F.2d 861 (1961); People v. Dorr, 265 [...] There are many other cases in which the "relevancy to a lawful inquiry" test has been applied to subpoenas issued by agencies or officials investigating anti‑trust violations; see People v. Allen, 103 N.E.2d 92 (Ill. 1952); Federal Trade Commission v. Tuttle, 244 F.2d 605 (2d Cir. 1957); Adams v. Federal Trade Commission, [...] Thus in the circumstances here present, what we observed in People v. Allen, 410 Ill. 508, 517, 103 N.E.2d 92, 96, is particularly pertinent: "In litigated cases, materiality can be fixed with a relatively high degree of precision by reference to the issues formulated in the pleadings.