Advanced Search
- All Databases (1,254)
- Decisions (530)
- Resources (724)
1,254 result(s)
-
826.
McDonald v. New Brunswick Electric Power Commission - [1979] 2 SCR 784 - 1979-05-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
Solicitors for the appellant: Hoyt, Mockler, Allen & Dixon, Fredericton.
-
827.
Fidelity Insurance Co. of Canada et al. v. Cronkhite Supply Ltd. et al. - [1979] 2 SCR 27 - 1979-05-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsPriorities and hypothecs
W.S. Berardino and Miss Marion Allen, for the third party, appellant.
-
828.
SCR | RCS [1979] vol 1 - 1979-05-01
Canada Supreme Court ReportsThe rule of highest intermediate value up to the time of trial formerly prevailed in that State, and may be found laid down in Romaine v. Van Allen, 26 N.Y. 309, and Markham v. Jaudon, 41 N.Y. 235, and other cases,—although the rigid application of the rule was deprecated by the New York Superior Court in an able opinion by [...] La règle de la cote intermédiaire maximale des actions y a déjà prévalu, comme le démontrent certains arrêts, notamment Romaine v. Van Allen, 26 N.Y. 309 et Markham v. Jaudon, 41 N.Y. 235,—mais son applica-tion rigoureuse a été désapprouvée par la Cour supé-rieure de New York: voir le jugement du juge Duer dans Suydam v.
-
829.
SCR | RCS [1978] vol 2 - 1978-12-20
Canada Supreme Court ReportsOn the question of prospects of remarriage, the Au sujet de la possibilité de remariage, le juge a judge adopted the apt comments of Phillimore J. fait siens les commentaires judicieux du juge Phil-in Buckley v. John Allen & Ford (Oxford) Ltd.3 limore dans l'affaire Buckley v. John Allen & including the statement [...] It is at least helpful in appreciating the nature and effect of a notice on title originating either under ss. 149 or 209 to consider the remarks of Allen J.A. in Re Zeller's Limited, supra, (at p. 26): A caveat is in fact only a warning of the existence of a claim, the nature of which should be stated therein. [...] Il est pour le moins utile de lire les observations suivantes du juge Allen de la Cour d'appel dans Re Zeller's Limited, précité, (à la p. 26) pour com-prendre la nature et les effets d'un avis apposé sur un titre de propriété en vertu des art. 149 ou 209: [TRADUCTION] Une opposition sert en fait à signaler l'existence
-
830.
Asamera Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Sea Oil & General Corporation et al. - [1979] 1 SCR 633 - 1978-10-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsTorts
The rule of highest intermediate value up to the time of trial formerly prevailed in that State, and may be found laid down in Romaine v. Van Allen, 26 N.Y. 309, and Markham v. Jaudon, 41 N.Y. 235, and other cases,—although the rigid application of the rule was deprecated by the New York Superior Court in an able opinion by
-
831.
Dukart v. Corporation of the District of Surrey - [1978] 2 SCR 1039 - 1978-05-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
It is at least helpful in appreciating the nature and effect of a notice on title originating either under ss. 149 or 209 to consider the remarks of Allen J.A. in Re Zeller’s Limited, supra, (at p. 26):
-
832.
Keizer v. Hanna and Buch - [1978] 2 SCR 342 - 1978-01-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsMotor vehicles
Torts
On the question of prospects of remarriage, the judge adopted the apt comments of Phillimore J. in Buckley v. John Allen & Ford (Oxford) Ltd.[3] including the statement that judges should act on evidence rather than guesswork and, there being no evidence of any existing interest or attachment, concluded: “I therefore [...] After quoting from Phillimore J. in Buckley v. John Allen & Ford (Oxford) Ltd.[8], at p. 542, the learned trial judge concluded:
-
833.
SCR | RCS [1978] vol 1 - 1978-01-01
Canada Supreme Court ReportsThe Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal of Allen Robindaine and Jeannette Martineau because it found no manifest error in the trial judgment. [...] The appeal d'Allen Robindaine et de Jeannette Martineau doit of Allen Robindaine and Jeannette Martineau donc être rejeté sous réserve d'une correction must therefore be dismissed, subject to a minor mineure dont il sera question plus loin. correction which will be considered later. [...] If it may be subséquemment décédée», c'est-à-dire contraire à son construed for his interest or against it (Massey v. Allen) intérêt lorsqu'elle le fait.
-
834.
R. v. O’Brien - [1978] 1 SCR 591 - 1977-06-24
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
If it may be construed for his interest or against it (Massey v. Allen) or may only be against his interest in certain future events (ex parte Edwards) it is inadmissible.
-
835.
SCR | RCS [1977] vol 2 - 1977-06-24
Canada Supreme Court ReportsRonald J. Downie, Q.C., and Barry S. Allen, for the respondent. The judgment of Laskin C.J. and Spence and Beetz JJ. was delivered by THE CHIEF JUSTICE—This appeal arises out of proceedings which, in form, raised the question whether the appellants were liable to pay the sewer development charge imposed by the respondent [...] Allen Feldman, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered by DE GRANDPRÉ J.— By its motion to dismiss, defendant-appellant is seeking to have plaintiff-respondent deprived of her right of action on the ' [1975] C.A. 399. [...] Allen Feldman, pour l'intimée. Le jugement de la Cour a été rendu par LE JUGE DE GRANDPRÉ—Par sa requête en irrecevabilité, la défenderesse-appelante veut faire déclarer la demanderesse-intimée déchue de son ' [1975] C.A. 399.
-
836.
Demeter v. R. - [1978] 1 SCR 538 - 1977-05-31
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
If it may be construed for his interest or against it (Massey v. Allen) (13 Ch. D. 558) or may only be against his interest in certain future events (Ex parte Edwards) (14 Q.B.D. 415) it is inadmissible.
-
837.
Highway Victims Indemnity Fund et al. v. Martineau - [1978] 1 SCR 247 - 1977-04-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsMotor vehicles
Jeannette Martineau and Allen Robindaine (Defendants) Appellants; and [...] On the evening of November 18, 1969, appellant Allen Robindaine, driving a car which was the property of his wife, appellant Jeannette Mar- [...] The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal of Allen Robindaine and Jeannette Martineau because it found no manifest error in the trial judgment.
-
838.
SCR | RCS [1977] vol 1 - 1977-02-02
Canada Supreme Court ReportsProwse J.A., speaking for himself and Allen J.A. said (at p. 492) that "prejudice [to the accused] must be inferred when [he] is not permit-ted to communicate confidentially with his coun-sel ...". [...] Allen appel ayant la forme d'une «nouvelle audition» sont J.A., in Caswell v. Alexandra Petroleums Ltd. 2, presque identiques à l'art. 55. [...] Le juge de la Cour de district a renvoyé aux observations du juge d'appel Allen dans l'arrêt
-
839.
SCR | RCS [1976] vol 2 - 1976-07-12
Canada Supreme Court Reports(1972), pp. 49-90; and Allen, Law in the Making, 7th ed. (1964), pp. 302-11.) [...] (1972), aux pp. 49 à 90 et Allen, Law in the Making, 7e éd. (1964), aux pp. 302 à 311.) [...] F. D. Allen, Q.C. and R. T. Willis, for the defendant, appellant. H. B. Parker and J. L. Condra, for the plaintiff, respondent.
-
840.
Jumaga v. R. - [1977] 1 SCR 486 - 1976-05-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Prowse J.A., speaking for himself and Allen J.A. said (at p. 492) that “prejudice [to the accused] must be inferred when [he] is not permitted to communicate confidentially with his counsel...”.
-
841.
Lamb v. Canadian Reserve Oil & Gas Ltd. - [1977] 1 SCR 517 - 1976-05-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsMines and minerals
Allen J.A., in Caswell v. Alexandra Petroleums Ltd.[2], held that the presiding judge ought not lightly to disturb the findings of the Board of Arbitration, but that it requires cogent evidence to establish where the Board was wrong and why its award should be varied or revised upward or downward. [...] The former accepted the views expressed by Allen J.A., who delivered the reasons of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Alberta, with reference to a similar situation, in the Caswell case, at p. 728: [...] The District Court judge made reference to the remarks of Allen J.A. in Copithorne v. Shell
-
842.
Montreal v. Vaillancourt - [1977] 2 SCR 849 - 1976-05-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
Allen Feldman, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered by
-
843.
Scotia Square Hotel Ltd. v. City of Halifax - [1977] 2 SCR 490 - 1976-04-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
Ronald J. Downie, Q.C., and Barry S. Allen, for the respondent. The judgment of Laskin C.J. and Spence and Beetz JJ. was delivered by
-
844.
SCR | RCS [1976] vol 1 - 1976-01-01
Canada Supreme Court ReportsAllen v. Minister of Manpower & Immigration (Fed. Ct.), leave to appeal refused, 21.6.76, autorisation d'appeler refusée. [...] Canadian Broadcasting Corporation & Starowicz & Allen v. Canada Metal et al. [...] In R. v. Emmons 10, Allen J.A. of du statut de la compagnie ni de la situation régu-the Appellate Division of the Alberta Supreme lière de celui-ci.
-
845.
SCR | RCS [1975] vol 2 - 1975-12-31
Canada Supreme Court ReportsWith respect to the first issue stated by Allen J.A., in para. (a), I am in agreement with the reasons of Johnson J.A. and Allen J.A. for hold-ing that the Board properly included the $300, 000 item referred to in that paragraph. [...] Allen J.A. says: Although I can find no express statement in any case to that effect it seems to me that there is a difference in concept of values in such cases. [...] A l'égard de la première question énoncée par le juge d'appel Allen, à l'al. a), je souscris aux motifs qu'ont donnés les juges d'appel Johnson et Allen pour décider que la Commission était bien fondée à inclure la somme de $300,000 mentionnée dans cet alinéa.
-
846.
Winnipeg Teachers’ Association v. Winnipeg School Division No. 1. - [1976] 2 SCR 695 - 1975-10-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
F.D. Allen, Q.C. and R.T. Willis, for the defendant, appellant. H.B. Parker and J.L. Condra, for the plaintiff, respondent.
-
847.
Harrison v. Carswell - [1976] 2 SCR 200 - 1975-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsProperty law
(1972), pp. 49-90; and Allen, Law in the Making, 7th ed. (1964), pp. 302-11.)
-
848.
Rilling v. The Queen - [1976] 2 SCR 183 - 1975-06-26
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Allen J.A., in his reasons for judgment for the Appellate Division, stated that he did not think it fair to assume that members of the public who were not showing visible signs of impairment would be harassed.
-
849.
SCR | RCS [1975] vol 1 - 1975-01-01
Canada Supreme Court ReportsJames Allen Greer (Défendeur) Intimé. 1973: November 7, 8; 1973: December 21. 1973: les 7 et 8 novembre; 1973: le 21 décembre. [...] James Allen Greer (Défendeur) Intimé. 1974: March 18; 1974: April 2. 1974: le 18 mars; 1974: le 2 avril. [...] Allen J.A. dissented. par la majorité de la Division d'appel de l'Al-berta dans des motifs rédigés par le Juge d'appel McDermid, auxquels le Juge d'appel Cairns a souscrit.
-
850.
Little and Wolski v. R. - [1976] 1 SCR 20 - 1974-12-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
In R. v. Emmons[10], Allen J.A. of the Appellate Division of the Alberta Supreme Court reviewed many of the authorities.