Advanced Search
- All Databases (2,511)
- Decisions (1,094)
- Resources (1,417)
1,094 result(s)
-
201.
Ronald Smith, et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, et al. - 2006-12-07
Applications for LeaveRonald Smith, Patricia Anna Angell, Holly Ann Prockner, Joyce Ellen Lappage, Jo‑Anne Patricia Scott, Paul Persechino, Daniel Frederick MacDonald, Chris Murphy, Frederick Earl Meister, Earl Joseph Wall and David Herman Howie on their own behalf and as representatives of a Class of Plaintiffs [...] Ronald Smith, Patricia Anna Angell, Holly Ann Prockner, Joyce Ellen Lappage, Jo‑Anne Patricia Scott, Paul Persechino, Daniel Frederick MacDonald, Chris Murphy, Frederick Earl Meister, Earl Joseph Wall et David Herman Howie on their own behalf and as representatives of a Class of Plaintiffs
-
202.
Buchbinder v. R. - [1983] 2 SCR 159 - 1983-10-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Ian Scott, Q.C., and Ross Wells, for the intervener. The judgment of the Court was delivered by [...] Solicitors for the intervener: Cameron, Brewin & Scott, Toronto.
-
203.
D. Atlantic Inc. v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario and the Attorney General of Ontario - 2008-09-18
Applications for LeaveD. Atlantic Inc., carrying on business as Treasures, Scott Kurtzman, Anna Wrzosek and Jeffrey Burnett, 1094388 Ontario Limited, carrying on business as Pure Gold, Darko Vranich, Michael Nelson and Joseph Yagar, 1075971 Ontario Inc., carrying on business as the Nuden, Doug Pettit, Karl Kalli, Shawn Norton, Andrea Irwin, [...] D. Atlantic Inc., faisant affaire sous le nom de Treasures, Scott Kurtzman, Anna Wrzosek et Jeffrey Burnett, 1094388 Ontario Limited, faisant affaire sous le nom de Pure Gold, Darko Vranich, Michael Nelson et Joseph Yagar, 1075971 Ontario Inc., faisant affaire sous le nom de Nuden, Doug Pettit, Karl Kalli, Shawn Norton,
-
204.
United States of America v. Link and Green - [1955] SCR 183 - 1955-03-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
This was an application under s. 41 of the Supreme Court Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 259, for leave to appeal from the refusal of Chief Justice Scott, of the Superior Court of the Province of Quebec, to issue a warrant for the committal of the respondents under s. 18 of the Extradition Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 322. [...] Without calling on Counsel for the respondents the Chief Justice announced that the Members of the Court were unanimously of the opinion that there was no jurisdiction, as the refusal of Chief Justice Scott was not a judgment, as defined by s. 2(d), within the meaning of s. 41 of the Supreme Court Act.
-
205.
Olympic Towers Ltd. v. Shervale Developments Inc. et al. - [1980] 1 SCR 142 - 1979-10-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
David W. Scott, for the Owner, Robert A. Lalonde, in Trust. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by [...] Solicitors for the Owner, Robert A. Lalonde, in Trust: Scott & Aylen, Ottawa.
-
206.
Peters v. Perras - (1909) 42 SCR 244 - 1909-04-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
APPEAL from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alberta[1], affirming the judgment of Scott J., at the trial[2], which dismissed the plaintiff's action with costs. [...] At the trial Scott J. dismissed the action, holding that the makers were not liable, that the note, on its face, shewed that interest thereon was overdue at the time of the transfer, and, consequently, that the transferee was put upon inquiry before purchasing it, and that, this circumstance, coupled with other suspicious
-
207.
Robert Adamson, et al. v. Air Canada, et al. - 2016-03-10
Applications for LeaveHoward Minaker, George Morgan, Greg Mutchler, Hal Osenjak, Sten Palbom, Michael Pearson, David Powell-Williams, Paul Prentice, Michael Reid, Patrick Rieschi, Steven Ross, Gary Scott, Phillip Shaw, Andrew Sheret, Michael Shulist, Donald Smith, Owen Stewart, Ray Thwaites, Dale Trueman, Andre Verschelden and Douglas Zebedee [...] Howard Minaker, George Morgan, Greg Mutchler, Hal Osenjak, Sten Palbom, Michael Pearson, David Powell-Williams, Paul Prentice, Michael Reid, Patrick Rieschi, Steven Ross, Gary Scott, Phillip Shaw, Andrew Sheret, Michael Shulist, Donald Smith, Owen Stewart, Ray Thwaites, Dale Trueman, Andre Verschelden et Douglas Zebedee
-
208.
Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. New Brunswick (Attorney General) - [1996] 3 SCR 480 - 1996-10-31
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Criminal law
Applied: Dagenais v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835; referred to: Danson v. Ontario (Attorney General), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1086; Edmonton Journal v. Alberta (Attorney General), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1326; Scott v. Scott, [1913] A.C. 419; Re Southam Inc. and The Queen (No.1) (1983), 41 O.R. (2d) 113; Attorney [...] The principle was described in the early English case of Scott v. Scott, [1913] A.C. 419 (H.L.). [...] In Scott, supra, Earl Loreburn, at pp. 445-46, described the basis for exclusion of the public from the courts in these terms:
-
209.
R. v. Clifford - 2017 SCC 9 - [2017] 1 SCR 164 - 2017-02-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsWilliam Scott Clifford Appellant and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent [...] William Scott Clifford Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent
-
210.
R. v. Diamond - 2016 SCC 46 - [2016] 2 SCR 291 - 2016-11-03
Supreme Court JudgmentsScott Diamond Appellant and Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Newfoundland and Labrador [...] Scott Diamond Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Newfoundland and Labrador and
-
211.
R. v. Steele - 2007 SCC 36 - [2007] 3 SCR 3 - 2007-07-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Discussed: R. v. Covin, [1983] 1 S.C.R. 725; R. v. Chang (1989), 50 C.C.C. (3d) 413; Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137 (1995); referred to: McGuigan v. The Queen, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 284; Krug v. The Queen, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 255; R. v. Langevin (1979), 47 C.C.C. (2d) 138; R. v. Belair (1981), 24 C.R. (3d) 133; R. v. Scott [...] This view finds support in McGuigan, at p. 319; Langevin, at p. 146; R. v. Belair (1981), 24 C.R. (3d) 133 (Ont. C.A.), at p. 136; R. v. Scott (2000), 145 C.C.C. (3d) 52 (B.C.C.A.), per Braidwood J.A., at para. 43, aff’d on other grounds, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 425, 2001 SCC 73. [...] 22 But Covin predated Scott, and Parliament in the interim amended s. 85 to include the use of imitation firearms.
-
212.
Parent v. Lapointe - [1952] 1 SCR 376 - 1952-02-05
Supreme Court JudgmentsMotor vehicles
(Scott v. St. Katherine Docks (1865) 3 H. & C. 596; Ottawa Electric Co. v. Crepin [1931] S.C.R. 407 and Demers v. Demers Q.R. (1931) 37 R. de J. 161 referred to). [...] The rule res ipsa loquitur is applicable to this case (Scott v. London & St. Katherine Docks 11, Winnipeg Electric Co. v. Geel 12 and Gauthier v. The King 13). [...] Dans Scott v. London & St. Catherine Docks Co. 21, décision acceptée par la Cour Supreme, Ottawa Electric v. Crépin 22, il est dit ce qui suit:
-
213.
Conmee v. Securities Holding Co. - (1907) 38 SCR 601 - 1907-05-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsSecurities
Scott & Horton v. Godfrey[15]. THE CHIEF JUSTICE.—As more fully explained by my brother Davies, the plaintiffs (A.E. Ames & Co.), now respondents, allege that on the 28th April, 1902, as stock brokers doing business in Toronto, they were instructed by the defendant, now appellant, to purchase for him in a way [...] Mollett v. Robinson[16] at p. 94; Scott & Horton v. Godfrey[17] at p. 736; Bentinck v. London Joint Stock Bank[18] pp. 120-140-141; Chase v. City of Boston[19]. [...] The case of Scott & Horton v. Godfrey[25], relied on by the learned chancellor at the trial, is quite different from the present.
-
214.
Heiminck v. The Municipality of the Town of Edmonton - (1898) 28 SCR 501 - 1898-06-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsMunicipal law
The case was tried in the Supreme Court for the North-west Territories, District of Northern Alberta, before Scott J., who dismissed the plaintiff's action with costs and this decision was affirmed by the full court, sitting en banc, Rouleau J. dissenting. [...] As to the question of dedication, the trial judge, (Scott J.), held that the evidence was not sufficient to establish a dedication. [...] It was a question for the trial judge, (Scott J.) who distinctly held that there was no evidence of any intention to dedicate on the part of the patentee.
-
215.
Richard James Goodwin, et al. c. Colombie-Britannique (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), et al. - 2014-11-27
Applications for LeaveScott Roberts Respondent AND BETWEEN: British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) and Attorney General of British Columbia [...] Scott Roberts Intimé ET ENTRE : Colombie-Britannique (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) et Procureur général de la Colombie-Britannique
-
216.
BridgeMark Financial Corp., et al. v. British Columbia Securities Commission, et al. - 2021-03-04
Applications for Leave - DismissedCorp., 658111 B.C. Ltd., Jason Christopher Shull, Tryton Financial Corp., Abeir Haddad, Tavistock Capital Corp., Robert John Lawrence, Jarman Capital Inc., Scott Jason Jarman, Northwest Marketing and Management Inc., Aly Babu Husein Mawji, Rufiza Babu Husein Mawji-Esmail, Denise Marie Trainor, Randy White, Escher Invest [...] Corp., 658111 B.C. Ltd., Jason Christopher Shull, Tryton Financial Corp., Abeir Haddad, Tavistock Capital Corp., Robert John Lawrence, Jarman Capital Inc., Scott Jason Jarman, Northwest Marketing and Management Inc., Aly Babu Husein Mawji, Rufiza Babu Husein Mawji-Esmail, Denise Marie Trainor, Randy White, Escher Invest
-
217.
Justin Edgar Liu, et al. v. British Columbia Securities Commission, et al. - 2021-03-04
Applications for Leave - DismissedCorp., 658111 B.C. Ltd., Jason Christopher Shull, Tryton Financial Corp., Abeir Haddad, Tavistock Capital Corp., Robert John Lawrence, Jarman Capital Inc., Scott Jason Jarman, Northwest Marketing And Management Inc., Aly Babu Husein Mawji, Rufiza Babu Husein Mawji-Esmail, Denise Marie Trainor, Randy White, Escher Invest [...] Corp., 658111 B.C. Ltd., Jason Christopher Shull, Tryton Financial Corp., Abeir Haddad, Tavistock Capital Corp., Robert John Lawrence, Jarman Capital Inc., Scott Jason Jarman, Northwest Marketing And Management Inc., Aly Babu Husein Mawji, Rufiza Babu Husein Mawji-Esmail, Denise Marie Trainor, Randy White, Escher Invest
-
218.
Kovach v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board) - 2000 SCC 3 - [2000] 1 SCR 55 - 2000-01-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsLabour law
R. Mark Powers and Scott A. Nielsen, for the appellant the Workers’ Compensation Board of British Columbia. [...] Scott B. Stewart and Sandra M. Katalinic, for the respondent Kovach.
-
219.
Order: Manitoba Language Rights - [1985] 2 SCR 347 - 1985-11-04
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Stephen A. Scott and Kathleen Weil, for Alliance Québec. Gérald Beaudoin, Q.C., for the Fédération des francophones hors Québec. [...] Solicitor for Alliance Québec: Stephen A. Scott, Montréal. Solicitors for the Fédération des francophones hors Québec: Beaudoin & Michon, Hull.
-
220.
Sinclair v. Quebec (Attorney General) - [1991] 3 SCR 134 - 1991-10-09
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Stephen A. Scott and Victoria Percival‑Hilton, for the intervener Alliance Quebec. [...] Solicitor for the intervener Alliance Quebec: Stephen A. Scott, Montréal.
-
221.
In re Smart - (1889) 16 SCR 396 - 1889-04-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
W.H. Kerr Q.C. and Scott Q.C. for the respondent. The judgment of the court was delivered by [...] Solicitor for respondent: H.J. Scott. [1] 12 Ont. P.R. 635. [2] 12 Ont. P.R. 312.
-
222.
Hessler v. Can. Pac. Ry. Co. - [1935] SCR 585 - 1935-11-07
Supreme Court JudgmentsTransportation
These American cases, while not differing in principle, are closer to the facts of this case than the English decisions in Gorris v. Scott[4], and Atkinson v. Newcastle & Gateshead Waterworks Co.[5]. [...] In Gorris v. Scott[15] the statutory provision relied on was the Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act, under which the Privy Council made orders, which they were authorized to do, in reference to animals brought into Great Britain on board vessels. [...] He relied mainly on the principle affirmed in the English cases of Gorris v. Scott[19], Le Lièvre v. Gould[20] and Atkinson v. Newcastle & Gateshead Waterworks Co.[21], and the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in 1929 in Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Mihas[22], where that court quoted with approval
-
223.
Great Northern Ry. Co. of Canada v. Furness, Withy & Co. - (1908) 40 SCR 455 - 1908-06-16
Supreme Court JudgmentsAppeal
The Attorney General of Quebec v. Scott (34 Can. S.C.R. 282) and The Halifax Election Cases (37 Can. S.C.R. 601) referred to. [...] The Attorney General of Quebec v. Scott[2], and The Halifax Election Cases.[3] are in point.
-
224.
Alain v. Hardy - [1951] SCR 540 - 1951-04-13
Supreme Court JudgmentsMotor vehicles
Held further, that following the principle enunciated in City of Montreal v. Watt and Scott, the father did not have to establish that it was physically impossible for him to prevent the damage (i.e., force majeure), but that he was unable to prevent it by reasonable means (i.e., that there was absence of fault on his [...] Cette cause a été subséquemment commentée par le Conseil Privé dans la cause de Watt v. Scott et la Cité de Montréal 10. [...] Dans Watt v. Scott et la Cité de Montréal 16, après avoir réaffirmé le principe que le paragraphe 6 de 1054 s'applique à tous les paragraphes de cet article, sauf au dernier relatif aux maîtres et serviteurs, Lord Dunedin s'exprimait ainsi:
-
225.
Shaw v. Masson - [1923] SCR 187 - 1922-12-19
Supreme Court JudgmentsAction
H.J. Scott K.C. for the appellant. W.L. Scott K.C. for the respondent. [...] Solicitors for the respondent: Ewart, Scott, Kelley & Kelley. [1] 10 Ves. 292.